Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:13:38 -0400, Harryk
wrote: May 16, 2011 Retracted climate critics' study panned by expert By Dan Vergano, USA TODAY Plagiarism and peer review concerns aside, some readers are asking whether a soon-to-be-retracted study by climate critics was any good. So, we asked an expert. the right's gonna be all over this! you bet...surely beck and rush will feature this...legislators will call for investigations... oh. wait...this is by climate change CRITICS which means we'll never hear from them again But how good was the study? We asked network analysis expert Kathleen Carley of Carnegie Mellon to take a look at whether the CSDA study, a "bibliometric" critique of publishing links between climate scientists, was any good in the first place. "I see this paper as more of an opinion piece," Carley says, by email. carnegie mellon...you cant trust ANYONE who went there! :-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bush: Intelligence revealed to rebut critics | General | |||
The Sailing Expert? | ASA | |||
Bush critics do not count | ASA | |||
OT) Expert: U.S. less safe now | General | |||
Expert: U.S. less safe now | General |