On Mon, 16 May 2011 00:25:41 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 15 May 2011 21:18:29 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

The fact is there are more Taliban now than there were in 2002 but the
vast majority of them have no interest in attacking the US, they just
want us out of their country, just like they wanted the Soviets out.
We somehow feel the need and the right to impose our culture on them
and they don't like it.

Well, in order to have less Taliban, you have to be prepared to kill them.

Or like cockroaches they can become a bigger problem.

I do think it best to leave, but after building a monument our of
concrete. It will read.

"Live in peace, do what you want inside your borders and we will ignore
your barbarism. But take your problems to us again, this will be ground
zero."

Put it right in-front of their capital buildings. And if they ause
trouble in the future, including frug trade, nuke'em. No need to spread
American and Canadian blood for a barbaric culture.

The point is the Taliban don't really care about us one way or the
other., If we get out they will chug along in their 10th century world
without giving us a second thought.

gee. how much thought did they give us on 9/10/2001?

too much for my liking

but, then, i was there in the aftermath. you weren't

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:04:07 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 15/05/2011 11:20 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2011 12:55:23 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...


either the taliban agree NEVER to ally with al qaida and other enemies
again, or we destroy them

YOU want to appease them

tell it to czechoslovakia

You say the right has done all this. Look at the facts. In the last
forty years, most of the time the democrats have had control of at least
two of the three (congress, senate, oval office), and sometimes all
three, the "right" has never had that. I do clearly remember Pelosi
though calling herself the leader of the "do nothing congress" making
sure that even though the right had been voted in, their hands were tied
with investigations and other bull****...

let's see..the GOP had TOTAL control of congress under bush. result?

a depression.

the economy grows FASTER under DEMS than it does under the GOP:

http://www.eriposte.com/economy/other/demovsrep.htm

Actually, again you are full of ****. The economy was doing ok until
the congress of 2006 when the dimwitts started printing too much money.



ROFLMAO!!!

credit default swaps...the collateralized debt obligations that blew
up the economy....went from

320 billion in 97

to SIXTY TWO TRILLION in 2007

in 10 years they expanded by a factor of 12,000%

yet you ignore that in favor of some mythology about the dems

you got proof right winger?

i just gave you the numbers about CDS's. THAT"S what killed us

and it was engineered by the RIGHT WING DEREGULATION of the banking
industy

so you're WRONG

as ususal


In essence, government caused the depression by overspending and not
paying fair interest rates on borrowed money. In a nutshell, DC started
counterfeiting its own currency.

meaningless

Yeah, too bad Pelosi and Reid spent their time with bogus investigations
designed to smear those they could never beat in the polls...


--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 16 May 2011 00:25:41 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 15 May 2011 21:18:29 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

The fact is there are more Taliban now than there were in 2002 but the
vast majority of them have no interest in attacking the US, they just
want us out of their country, just like they wanted the Soviets out.
We somehow feel the need and the right to impose our culture on them
and they don't like it.

Well, in order to have less Taliban, you have to be prepared to kill them.

Or like cockroaches they can become a bigger problem.

I do think it best to leave, but after building a monument our of
concrete. It will read.

"Live in peace, do what you want inside your borders and we will ignore
your barbarism. But take your problems to us again, this will be ground
zero."

Put it right in-front of their capital buildings. And if they ause
trouble in the future, including frug trade, nuke'em. No need to spread
American and Canadian blood for a barbaric culture.

The point is the Taliban don't really care about us one way or the
other., If we get out they will chug along in their 10th century world
without giving us a second thought.

gee. how much thought did they give us on 9/10/2001?

too much for my liking

but, then, i was there in the aftermath. you weren't

Again with the "I saw it once so now I am an expert".. Pfffttt...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

On Sun, 15 May 2011 21:34:06 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 15/05/2011 11:47 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2011 13:35:46 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sun, 15 May 2011 13:07:29 -0400, wrote:

The numbers are skewed because dishonest democrats are embarrassed to
call themselves, "liberals" and dead dog ideologues like yourself JPS
and Harry, think they are middle of the road.snerk

ah the 'no true scotsman' fallacy heard from.

hell i'm a liberal. i'm not ashamed of it because it means i love my
country while the right views the US as a big piggybank.

No, you are a selfish mindless greedy *******. And I don't mind telling
you.

You vote for more debt and government you can't afford

gee. biggest spenders in US history?

the GOP

bush's last budget was a TRILLION in debt

but you ignore that

and you say I am greedy!!!


, which you will
never pay for. You openly support Obama-debt that will screw up your
grandkids future with your debt-taxes because you are a selfish welfare
prick today. You have excuses, you envy like a leach, your basically a
pathetic racist fool.

gee. i never voted for bush and he ran up the debt to over a TRILLION
in his last term

he spent ANOTHER trillion in iraq and NEVER PAYED FOR IT

but you ignore that.

the ONLY LOGICAL conclusion is that you're a racist

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 15 May 2011 21:34:06 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 15/05/2011 11:47 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2011 13:35:46 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sun, 15 May 2011 13:07:29 -0400, wrote:

The numbers are skewed because dishonest democrats are embarrassed to
call themselves, "liberals" and dead dog ideologues like yourself JPS
and Harry, think they are middle of the road.snerk

ah the 'no true scotsman' fallacy heard from.

hell i'm a liberal. i'm not ashamed of it because it means i love my
country while the right views the US as a big piggybank.

No, you are a selfish mindless greedy *******. And I don't mind telling
you.

You vote for more debt and government you can't afford

gee. biggest spenders in US history?

the GOP

You are soooo full of ****.. Who wrote the checks, it was Pelosi and
Reid...



the ONLY LOGICAL conclusion is that you're a racist

A racist is someone who judges somebody by the color of their skin and
you, Harry, and Plum are the only ones here who do that..



--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

On Sun, 15 May 2011 22:52:27 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 15/05/2011 9:55 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2011 11:33:51 -0400, wrote:


you right wingers turned this country over to wall street THEN got
offended when they BANKRUPTED THE COUNTRY

In a weak half assed way yes. But will admit, it was a BS spinless
effort. When I heard they were arguaing about just $60 billion on a
$1.6 trillion deficit, I just laughed at the stupidity.

yep. the right wing bankrupted us, talked the big talk and now cant
even find pocket change. let 'em go after the seniors. they're the
idiots who voted for this congress


Bottom line, DC is corrupted. Unless a stong set of leaders come in, I
don't see anything but the sewer for USA economics. Like Pearl Haror,
everyone is in denial and/or asleep at the wheel. Looks like the
leasons of reality have to strike before the dumb****s learn their
lesson. Simple lesson too, no prosperity in debt.

and the folks most in denial?

the american right wing

filled with supply side mythology, the 'american dream' crap and
christian fanaticism, they'll doom this country

On Mon, 16 May 2011 00:33:22 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:36:49 -0400, wf3h wrote:

http://www.opensecrets.org/bigpictur...Rep&Cycle=2008

Wow, great list. Shows the union corruption.

amount of money unions took out of the US economy in the last 3 years:

zero

amount wall street did?

10 trillion.

Most of that money never existed in the first place

which hardly is relevant to the fact they created it, then deflated
the bubble and took their profits. the only think it hurt was america

.. It was created
out of thin air by Wall Street to fund the housing market and the
construction unions got plenty of that money\

uh no. the unions got zip. nada. the real profit takers were those who
bought and sold credit default swaps in the HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of
dollars

why not read up on economics instead of cliches? might learn
something.

BILLIONS went to wall street. the carpenter making $30 and hour..do
you REALLY think HE bankrupted us??

that your argument??

On Mon, 16 May 2011 09:35:01 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:


BTW, just using common sense, if SS benefits are reduced, what money
will replace it?
For those who who have no other funds, they will go on some form of
public aid, food stamps, etc, maybe populate gullies and culverts with
homeless old people.

GOP former senator alan simpson called SS recipients
'parasites'...finally seniors are realizng what the GOP thinks of them

On Sun, 15 May 2011 21:24:22 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/05/2011 7:36 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2011 14:26:34 -0600,
wrote:

So was Bush signing the checks while Obama was in office?

yep. the checks had already been signed. that's what happens when you
pass a budget

you dont know anything about the US political process


but he's white...so we can't blame him

So is Obama being black an excuse or a reason?

you tell me. you're the kluxer

So is that an unemployable black panther fleabagger talk?

hard to type that from under your hood?

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 15 May 2011 21:34:06 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 15/05/2011 11:47 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2011 13:35:46 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sun, 15 May 2011 13:07:29 -0400, wrote:

The numbers are skewed because dishonest democrats are embarrassed to
call themselves, "liberals" and dead dog ideologues like yourself JPS
and Harry, think they are middle of the road.snerk

ah the 'no true scotsman' fallacy heard from.

hell i'm a liberal. i'm not ashamed of it because it means i love my
country while the right views the US as a big piggybank.

No, you are a selfish mindless greedy *******. And I don't mind telling
you.

You vote for more debt and government you can't afford

gee. biggest spenders in US history?

the GOP

You are soooo full of ****.. Who wrote the checks, it was Pelosi and
Reid...



the ONLY LOGICAL conclusion is that you're a racist

A racist is someone who judges somebody by the color of their skin and
you, Harry, and Plum are the only ones here who do that..

He promised to bankrupt us away from Oil and he is doing it, he sold us
to the Unions, GE, and Health care lobbyists, and is printing money like
crazy to kill the economy because he hates the middle class just like
you do, and you let him have a pass for the sole reason you perceive
him as black... The blacks in my neighborhood would tell you what a
piece of **** you are for that... Of course I don't patronize any race
like you do, so I would know these things where you wouldn't. I am sure
any blacks you know, have you pinned as a patsy already. Maybe that's
why you haven't had a raise in ten years... Nobody wants a wet noodle
around..

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!