On Fri, 13 May 2011 12:29:20 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

Ron Paul, the Texas congressman, declared his (third) candidacy for
president Friday on ‘Good Morning America.’ The ‘intellectual
grandfather’ of the tea party movement is a constitutional purist who’s
as popular among his fervent followers as he is disliked by the GOP
establishment. He’s a dark horse pushing for an upset victory.
- - -

Ah, yes...Crazy Ron...about as much chance of winning the presidency as,
say, Newt, the Donald, the Sara, the Michele, the Mitt, et cetera.

the GOP is so far right that ronald reagan would be unelectable today.

"wf3h" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 13 May 2011 12:29:20 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

Ron Paul, the Texas congressman, declared his (third) candidacy for
president Friday on ‘Good Morning America.’ The ‘intellectual
grandfather’ of the tea party movement is a constitutional purist who’s
as popular among his fervent followers as he is disliked by the GOP
establishment. He’s a dark horse pushing for an upset victory.
- - -

Ah, yes...Crazy Ron...about as much chance of winning the presidency as,
say, Newt, the Donald, the Sara, the Michele, the Mitt, et cetera.

the GOP is so far right that ronald reagan would be unelectable today.

*******************

I guess it's every man for themselves... and those lucky enough to be the
winners like it like that.
What I find hard to understand is why people at the bottom of the barrel
would still go out and support that system. You'd think self interest would
kick in for them just as it does for the ruling elite.

True North wrote:


"wf3h" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 13 May 2011 12:29:20 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

Ron Paul, the Texas congressman, declared his (third) candidacy for
president Friday on ‘Good Morning America.’ The ‘intellectual
grandfather’ of the tea party movement is a constitutional purist who’s
as popular among his fervent followers as he is disliked by the GOP
establishment. He’s a dark horse pushing for an upset victory.
- - -

Ah, yes...Crazy Ron...about as much chance of winning the presidency as,
say, Newt, the Donald, the Sara, the Michele, the Mitt, et cetera.

the GOP is so far right that ronald reagan would be unelectable today.

*******************

I guess it's every man for themselves... and those lucky enough to be
the winners like it like that.
What I find hard to understand is why people at the bottom of the barrel
would still go out and support that system. You'd think self interest
would kick in for them just as it does for the ruling elite.


I'm hoping for heads on pikes...if I were in charge, I'd start with the
boys on wall street, then the bankers, then the health insurance
companies, then the holier than thou religious fanatics.

On Sun, 15 May 2011 12:57:47 -0300, "True North"
wrote:



"wf3h" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 13 May 2011 12:29:20 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

Ron Paul, the Texas congressman, declared his (third) candidacy for
president Friday on ‘Good Morning America.’ The ‘intellectual
grandfather’ of the tea party movement is a constitutional purist who’s
as popular among his fervent followers as he is disliked by the GOP
establishment. He’s a dark horse pushing for an upset victory.
- - -

Ah, yes...Crazy Ron...about as much chance of winning the presidency as,
say, Newt, the Donald, the Sara, the Michele, the Mitt, et cetera.

the GOP is so far right that ronald reagan would be unelectable today.

*******************

I guess it's every man for themselves... and those lucky enough to be the
winners like it like that.
What I find hard to understand is why people at the bottom of the barrel
would still go out and support that system. You'd think self interest would
kick in for them just as it does for the ruling elite.


it's absolutely amazing how fundamentalist they are...in social
values, with rick santorum talking about 'collective' moral values
that enforce religion...and fundamentalist supply side economics which
views salaries as a drain on the economy, and only the rich need to
have money

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 15 May 2011 12:57:47 -0300, "True North"
wrote:



"wf3h" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 13 May 2011 12:29:20 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

Ron Paul, the Texas congressman, declared his (third) candidacy for
president Friday on ?Good Morning America.? The ?intellectual
grandfather? of the tea party movement is a constitutional purist who?s
as popular among his fervent followers as he is disliked by the GOP
establishment. He?s a dark horse pushing for an upset victory.
- - -

Ah, yes...Crazy Ron...about as much chance of winning the presidency as,
say, Newt, the Donald, the Sara, the Michele, the Mitt, et cetera.

the GOP is so far right that ronald reagan would be unelectable today.

*******************

I guess it's every man for themselves... and those lucky enough to be the
winners like it like that.
What I find hard to understand is why people at the bottom of the barrel
would still go out and support that system. You'd think self interest would
kick in for them just as it does for the ruling elite.


it's absolutely amazing how fundamentalist they are...in social
values, with rick santorum talking about 'collective' moral values
that enforce religion...and fundamentalist supply side economics which
views salaries as a drain on the economy, and only the rich need to
have money

Santorum is a bs artist - he has no values.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politic...hn-Ensign-sex-
scandal-spreads-to-other-Republicans


Cuckold e-mails Santorum for help.
Santorum doesn't respond, but snitches to the cuckolder.
Tom coburn is all tied up in this too.
Amorals preaching morality.

On Sun, 15 May 2011 13:29:30 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 15 May 2011 11:50:14 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 15 May 2011 12:57:47 -0300, "True North"
wrote:

the GOP is so far right that ronald reagan would be unelectable today.

*******************

I guess it's every man for themselves... and those lucky enough to be the
winners like it like that.
What I find hard to understand is why people at the bottom of the barrel
would still go out and support that system. You'd think self interest would
kick in for them just as it does for the ruling elite.


it's absolutely amazing how fundamentalist they are...in social
values, with rick santorum talking about 'collective' moral values
that enforce religion...and fundamentalist supply side economics which
views salaries as a drain on the economy, and only the rich need to
have money

Santorum is a bs artist - he has no values.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politic...hn-Ensign-sex-
scandal-spreads-to-other-Republicans


Cuckold e-mails Santorum for help.
Santorum doesn't respond, but snitches to the cuckolder.
Tom coburn is all tied up in this too.
Amorals preaching morality.


Have you ever googled Santorum? ;-)




andrew sullivan had that about him a few years ago

those of us who suffered while this deluded communist was in power
here in PA are amazed he's still considered viable by the GOP

In article ,
says...


Have you ever googled Santorum? ;-)

Yes. And that's as sick as Santorum.
Just shows how low we are.
All poison, little common sense.

On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:56:48 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 15 May 2011 13:09:46 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...


Have you ever googled Santorum? ;-)

Yes. And that's as sick as Santorum.
Just shows how low we are.
All poison, little common sense.


That was actually Savage and his gay mafia that google bombed
Santorum.

You're defending Santorum??? Now that's funny!

wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:09:40 -0700, wrote:

On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:56:48 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 15 May 2011 13:09:46 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In ,
says...

Have you ever googled Santorum? ;-)
Yes. And that's as sick as Santorum.
Just shows how low we are.
All poison, little common sense.

That was actually Savage and his gay mafia that google bombed
Santorum.
You're defending Santorum??? Now that's funny!

I am just pointing out a fact. I have no opinion either way

You have no opinion on Nutcase Rick? :)

On Mon, 16 May 2011 12:26:09 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:09:40 -0700, wrote:

On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:56:48 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 15 May 2011 13:09:46 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...


Have you ever googled Santorum? ;-)

Yes. And that's as sick as Santorum.
Just shows how low we are.
All poison, little common sense.


That was actually Savage and his gay mafia that google bombed
Santorum.

You're defending Santorum??? Now that's funny!

I am just pointing out a fact. I have no opinion either way

What fact? You're afraid of something called the gay mafia? Talk about
delusional...