|
the silence of the right
is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of
congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. even our rabid right wingers here aren't frothing at the mouth telling us about the communists over 65 who deserve to die so the wealthy can have another billion |
the silence of the right
On 4/15/2011 10:36 PM, bob wrote:
is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. even our rabid right wingers here aren't frothing at the mouth telling us about the communists over 65 who deserve to die so the wealthy can have another billion Most, in Washington are silent letting Ryan etc take the lead and the heat. The voting records are not easily found immediately or published. Wish someone would take it on to publish voting records daily, on the net and everywhere and high light positions. |
the silence of the right
In article , Lil Abner
says... On 4/15/2011 10:36 PM, bob wrote: is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. even our rabid right wingers here aren't frothing at the mouth telling us about the communists over 65 who deserve to die so the wealthy can have another billion Most, in Washington are silent letting Ryan etc take the lead and the heat. The voting records are not easily found immediately or published. Wish someone would take it on to publish voting records daily, on the net and everywhere and high light positions. Only defense I've seen is the "won't happen for 10 years" defense. Same one Eisboch made. Don't worry, every one who voted for this will be called out by his opponent next election. "He voted to replace Medicare with death vouchers!" Don't know if that will work. After all, the voters were stupid enough to elect these jokers last time. You can't underestimate their intelligence. |
the silence of the right
|
the silence of the right
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 22:03:05 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote: In article , Lil Abner says... On 4/15/2011 10:36 PM, bob wrote: is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. even our rabid right wingers here aren't frothing at the mouth telling us about the communists over 65 who deserve to die so the wealthy can have another billion Most, in Washington are silent letting Ryan etc take the lead and the heat. The voting records are not easily found immediately or published. Wish someone would take it on to publish voting records daily, on the net and everywhere and high light positions. Only defense I've seen is the "won't happen for 10 years" defense. Same one Eisboch made. Don't worry, every one who voted for this will be called out by his opponent next election. "He voted to replace Medicare with death vouchers!" Don't know if that will work. After all, the voters were stupid enough to elect these jokers last time. You can't underestimate their intelligence. hell the GOP Is so radical even the idiot senior citizens who thought the GOP was gonna give THEM all the money are shocked by how much the GOP toadies to wall street!! and it turns out insurance companies have their own 'death panels' http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42613298/ns/nightly_news/ |
the silence of the right
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:27:10 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
Ryan proposed a plan knowing full well it would never be approved. It's the establishment of an initial negotiating position. The bottom line is that the entire health care system in the US needs to be overhauled, including Medicare. It will mean looking at other expenditures (such as the Pentagon) and making radical adjustments. Someone has to start the ball rolling. All the politicians in Washington have been sweeping these issues under the rug for years. Eisboch but we have the PERECT system 1 it's free enterprised based 2 it makes the rich richer 3 it allows insurance companies to allow who lives and dies 4 it rations by price 5 it's more expensive than other countries' care and covers fewer people and, above all, to repeat, it makes the rich richer!! govt paid healthcare systems are cheaper and more effective. but the GOP free market fundamentalists are enthralled by the rich |
the silence of the right
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 23:25:26 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote: In article , says... is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. even our rabid right wingers here aren't frothing at the mouth telling us about the communists over 65 who deserve to die so the wealthy can have another billion Because we are too busy laughing at you.. like i said, dont notice you rabid righties hopping up and down about how glad you are that now even the old folks can die to bankroll wall street |
the silence of the right
Lil Abner wrote:
On 4/15/2011 10:36 PM, bob wrote: is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. even our rabid right wingers here aren't frothing at the mouth telling us about the communists over 65 who deserve to die so the wealthy can have another billion Most, in Washington are silent letting Ryan etc take the lead and the heat. The voting records are not easily found immediately or published. Wish someone would take it on to publish voting records daily, on the net and everywhere and high light positions. Every GOP member of the House, with four exceptions, voted for that Bill. It is now official GOP policy, and we'll be able to hang them with it. |
the silence of the right
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 06:55:05 -0400, Harryk
wrote: Lil Abner wrote: On 4/15/2011 10:36 PM, bob wrote: is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. even our rabid right wingers here aren't frothing at the mouth telling us about the communists over 65 who deserve to die so the wealthy can have another billion Most, in Washington are silent letting Ryan etc take the lead and the heat. The voting records are not easily found immediately or published. Wish someone would take it on to publish voting records daily, on the net and everywhere and high light positions. Every GOP member of the House, with four exceptions, voted for that Bill. It is now official GOP policy, and we'll be able to hang them with it. it's ironic...ron paul voted against it. be interesting to see if the GOP can hoodwink and scare the senior citizen crowd like they did the last time |
the silence of the right
bob wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 06:55:05 -0400, wrote: Lil Abner wrote: On 4/15/2011 10:36 PM, bob wrote: is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. even our rabid right wingers here aren't frothing at the mouth telling us about the communists over 65 who deserve to die so the wealthy can have another billion Most, in Washington are silent letting Ryan etc take the lead and the heat. The voting records are not easily found immediately or published. Wish someone would take it on to publish voting records daily, on the net and everywhere and high light positions. Every GOP member of the House, with four exceptions, voted for that Bill. It is now official GOP policy, and we'll be able to hang them with it. it's ironic...ron paul voted against it. be interesting to see if the GOP can hoodwink and scare the senior citizen crowd like they did the last time This GOP Bill will certainly scare the bejesus out of seniors and those approaching seniorhood and in fact any adult with living parents. It'll be interesting to see how the GOP tries to walk away from it. All this to put more money in the hands of the richest at the expense of the elderly. How *very* Republican. |
the silence of the right
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:05:31 -0400, Harryk
wrote: Eisboch wrote: admits it fell far from the mark and is full of holes. Eisboch With all the voting blocs the GOP has offended and is continuing to offend, I suspect Obama will be re-elected, and it is possible the GOP will lose the House. To many, it looks as if the GOP only cares about putting more money in the pockets of the very wealthy. Add to that all the crazies on that side of the aisle, plus the damage the governors are doing... Still, the Dems are the recognized experts at converting potential victory into defeat. :) unfortunately i think ALOT Of the american public still harbors the idea that, if you work hard you'll get rich. this is PROvABLY false since even sweden has greater social mobility than we have. but that wont stop americans for voting for the rich. |
the silence of the right
On Apr 15, 10:36*pm, bob wrote:
is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. even our rabid right wingers here aren't frothing at the mouth telling us about the communists over 65 who deserve to die so the wealthy can have another billion By the time the right, and left are finished argueing stupidly about it, it'll be too late. Oh wait, it ALREADY IS. |
the silence of the right
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:13:37 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote: In article , says... Nobody in the GOP has told seniors they have to die so Wall Street can buy more yachts.. You are making up stuff to further your agenda. I find it an exercise in futility to discuss anything with people like yourself. You have a well proven track record as being as daffy to the left as Michele Buchmann is to the right. Eisboch Oh, ohhhh. You must be a racist! to a right winger, cliches take the place of evidence he's unable to do a coherent analysis of paul ryan's war against seniors and the middle class, so punts until he gets the party line from glen and rush Unfortunately, what you call "evidence" is nothing more than "Lobsta' boats and German screwdrivers".. fine. then rebut it. give me your evidence where is it? where's your evidence that seniors will NOT be penalized? where is you evidence that the rich WONT have their taxes cut? you right wingers...this is exactly what you do. you bull**** your way through life carrying all the other bull****ters with you. and you're burying the country in your bull**** |
the silence of the right
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 07:44:55 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c"
wrote: On Apr 15, 10:36*pm, bob wrote: is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. even our rabid right wingers here aren't frothing at the mouth telling us about the communists over 65 who deserve to die so the wealthy can have another billion By the time the right, and left are finished argueing stupidly about it, it'll be too late. Oh wait, it ALREADY IS. in a way it is. the right has won and the country is finished |
the silence of the right
|
the silence of the right
On 15/04/2011 8:36 PM, bob wrote:
is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. even our rabid right wingers here aren't frothing at the mouth telling us about the communists over 65 who deserve to die so the wealthy can have another billion What bill? You make no sense, typical fleabagger. DC is broke. And what a better way to justify a huge tax increase, say a 10% national sales tax than to take away the services of the people. That ploy has been used to Canada for decades. Because the people voted for liberal debt, liberal money creation, liberal bailouts, liberal ponzi banking, liberal greed. Now the price has to be paid -- cut - cut - cut as sooner or later they have to get to the pork and fat. -- I can assure you that the road to prosperity is not paved with fleabagger debt. |
the silence of the right
On 16/04/2011 4:55 AM, Harryk wrote:
Lil Abner wrote: On 4/15/2011 10:36 PM, bob wrote: is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. even our rabid right wingers here aren't frothing at the mouth telling us about the communists over 65 who deserve to die so the wealthy can have another billion Most, in Washington are silent letting Ryan etc take the lead and the heat. The voting records are not easily found immediately or published. Wish someone would take it on to publish voting records daily, on the net and everywhere and high light positions. Every GOP member of the House, with four exceptions, voted for that Bill. It is now official GOP policy, and we'll be able to hang them with it. Bottom line is fleabagger lefties broke the bank. Can we tax the supporters of debt we trust? Maybe people need to be registered in their support of massive debt so later they get the bills. Let our grandchildren be free of debt from fleabaggers. But socialism is a good idea as long as someone else pays for it right? Trouble is with you fleabaggers is that you are greedy welshers trying to stiff others with the bills. Good part, like musical chairs it will stop some day and those that count on big fat government will see the reckoning. -- I can assure you that the road to prosperity is not paved with fleabagger debt. |
the silence of the right
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:39:04 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 15/04/2011 8:36 PM, bob wrote: is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. even our rabid right wingers here aren't frothing at the mouth telling us about the communists over 65 who deserve to die so the wealthy can have another billion What bill? You make no sense, typical fleabagger. well canuck isnt too bright. doesnt follow american politics...so he's ignorant of paul ryan's bill that was passed in the house and, of course, as a right winger, that makes him an expert on it! Because the people voted for liberal debt, liberal money creation, liberal bailouts, liberal ponzi banking, liberal greed. HAHAHAH liberal bailouts! the money went to WALL STREET. dont know too many liberals who love giving billions to wall street AND the architect of the bailout was henry paulson former goldman sachs CEO and sec of the treasury under BUSH but obama's black, you see... |
the silence of the right
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:44:16 -0400, Lil Abner wrote:
On 4/16/2011 1:43 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 16/04/2011 2:27 AM, Eisboch wrote: Think, with all the banking fraud, including forged mortgage documents and the like, not one person is actually in jail. DC is corrupt to the core. The Military is not discretionary, especially these times. we spend 50% of the world's defense budget. do we REALLY need that to protect the US? As defense sec gates pointed out, we have 11 carriers; no other country has more than one China is building a huge Military and starting to muscle it's way around including threatning the US and Korea if the have Military exercises in the Yellow Sea. yep and right now they spend about 80B on defense. we spend 7 times that amount. we can form strategic alliances with other nations. any money we spend above our needs is just another form of foreign aid They have grabbed Vietnamese Atolls and Islands and other neighboring territories. fine. let the vietnamese fight them as they already have. otherwise, we can form an alliance with the vietnamese navy (like we are doing now) AND with the indian navy (our navy exercises more with the indian navy than we do with any other navy in the world). we can not afford to patrol the world. if other countries feel threatened by the chinese, let them spend their money. we can afford to defend ourselves agains the chinese but we can't afford to protect the world against every threat everyone faces They intend to take Taiwan thanks to Wall Street they may succeed. Russi grabbed more Japaneese Islands. They have developed Carrier Force killer missles. and we are developing counter weapons. but it may be time to ask if the carrier has outlived its usefulness. They have destroyed American Satellites. and we've destroyed theirs. russia's defense budget is less than the chinese and they have similar technology. we dont need to defend the world against all the threats. we simply can't afford it. thanks to wall street...let me repeat that... THANKS TO WALL STREET we now have to compromise our ability to defend our perceived interests this is part of the legacy the american people have to understand we've been given by wall street. |
the silence of the right
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:54:51 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 16/04/2011 4:55 AM, Harryk wrote: Lil Abner wrote: On 4/15/2011 10:36 PM, bob wrote: is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. Every GOP member of the House, with four exceptions, voted for that Bill. It is now official GOP policy, and we'll be able to hang them with it. Bottom line is fleabagger lefties broke the bank. Can we tax the supporters of debt we trust? more right wing horse**** bush broke the bank. the depression stared under BUSH and was caused, as alan greenspan said, by WALL STREET GREED. but the right wing wants to CONTINUE feeding wall street so they blame it on some mythical 'left' in america, howerver, there is no left. But socialism is a good idea as long as someone else pays for it right? socialism? where? we dont even have socialized medicine but canuck, who's a blithering moron cliche spouter, just makes up nonsenscial bull**** about monsters under the bed so he can continue telling us why wall street will protect america if we give them all our money |
the silence of the right
bob wrote:
is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. even our rabid right wingers here aren't frothing at the mouth telling us about the communists over 65 who deserve to die so the wealthy can have another billion How drunk were you when you attempted that post, Bob? |
the silence of the right
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 23:02:07 -0400, L G
wrote: bob wrote: is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. even our rabid right wingers here aren't frothing at the mouth telling us about the communists over 65 who deserve to die so the wealthy can have another billion How drunk were you when you attempted that post, Bob? why? do i look like rush or glen? you right wingers act as if any benefit not given to the rich is communist |
the silence of the right
|
the silence of the right
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 00:35:19 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. even our rabid right wingers here aren't frothing at the mouth telling us about the communists over 65 who deserve to die so the wealthy can have another billion Did you see the provision where they specifically took all of our assets and gave them to the rich. And, all of your future assets are to be confiscated and given to the rich. For the rest of your life you are to be enslaved to the rich and it is going to be codified in law. Are you happy now. it's already the case. they're just putting the finishing touches on it pretty soon the US will become like egypt |
the silence of the right
bob wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 23:02:07 -0400, L wrote: bob wrote: is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. even our rabid right wingers here aren't frothing at the mouth telling us about the communists over 65 who deserve to die so the wealthy can have another billion How drunk were you when you attempted that post, Bob? why? do i look like rush or glen? you right wingers act as if any benefit not given to the rich is communist "We" do? Really, Bob? |
the silence of the right
bob wrote:
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 00:35:19 -0400, wrote: In , says... is ANYONE defending this bill on the right? haven't seen anyone out of congress defending this attempt by the GOP to continue shifting middle class assets to the rich. even our rabid right wingers here aren't frothing at the mouth telling us about the communists over 65 who deserve to die so the wealthy can have another billion Did you see the provision where they specifically took all of our assets and gave them to the rich. And, all of your future assets are to be confiscated and given to the rich. For the rest of your life you are to be enslaved to the rich and it is going to be codified in law. Are you happy now. it's already the case. they're just putting the finishing touches on it pretty soon the US will become like egypt Is Obama building us pyramids? Cool! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com