On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 11:48:06 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 03:05:02 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 23:44:35 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

Reply:
The deficits are being driven up by overspending

the fact is the deficits are being driven up by bush's tax cuts. THEY
are the largest components of the deficit

your cliche is mindless babbling

REPLY:
Your racist cliché and Bush blame cliché is nothing but a cliché.

really? oh. i forgot. you right wingers have your myths and you dont
let evidence interfere with your delusions that the rich are the best
thing that's ever happened to the US.

well, there's always this:

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa...36&emailView=1

aw, damn, it shows the bush tax cuts are driving the deficit

that's a shame, right wnger, isn't it?

you say 'overspending' 'cuz you heard that on rush. it doesnt mean
anything but he said it so it MUST be true, right?



it's bush's fault because

1. he cut taxes especially on the rich

2. he increased spending by an unfunded drug program added to medicare

3. he increased spending by spending a trillion in iraq

4. he deregulated the markets so that wall street blew up the economy

and yet the right still blames

the black guy


The Bush tax cuts are about a quarter of the deficit (all of the
cuts, not just the $250k people).

gee. and that's exactly what i said. they are the LARGEST component.

The whole nut is $370B a year. The deficit is $1.5T
Repealing ALL of them is a start but not a panacea.
You still need to find $1.13T, either in more revenue or cutting
spending. So far the fed's answer is to print money

gee. i notice the RIGHT was doing this before the LEFT did. AND the
GOP has had congress now for4 months


and hasnt done ****. hasnt cut a dollar. not one. so your statement is
a meanigless cliche

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 11:48:06 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 03:05:02 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 23:44:35 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

Reply:
The deficits are being driven up by overspending

the fact is the deficits are being driven up by bush's tax cuts. THEY
are the largest components of the deficit

your cliche is mindless babbling

REPLY:
Your racist cliché and Bush blame cliché is nothing but a cliché.

really? oh. i forgot. you right wingers have your myths and you dont
let evidence interfere with your delusions that the rich are the best
thing that's ever happened to the US.

well, there's always this:

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa...36&emailView=1

aw, damn, it shows the bush tax cuts are driving the deficit

that's a shame, right wnger, isn't it?

you say 'overspending' 'cuz you heard that on rush. it doesnt mean
anything but he said it so it MUST be true, right?



it's bush's fault because

1. he cut taxes especially on the rich

2. he increased spending by an unfunded drug program added to medicare

3. he increased spending by spending a trillion in iraq

4. he deregulated the markets so that wall street blew up the economy

and yet the right still blames

the black guy


The Bush tax cuts are about a quarter of the deficit (all of the
cuts, not just the $250k people).

gee. and that's exactly what i said. they are the LARGEST component.

The whole nut is $370B a year. The deficit is $1.5T
Repealing ALL of them is a start but not a panacea.
You still need to find $1.13T, either in more revenue or cutting
spending. So far the fed's answer is to print money

gee. i notice the RIGHT was doing this before the LEFT did. AND the
GOP has had congress now for4 months


and hasnt done ****. hasnt cut a dollar. not one. so your statement is
a meanigless cliche

The fact you fail to note it that the Democrats have basically "had
congress" for almost 50 years... But you only want to blame it on the
republicans because they have had one of three parts of the leadership
triangle for four months.. The fact is, the democrats have been in
charge during the whole destruction of our economy.

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

On Sun, 1 May 2011 08:43:45 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...


gee. i notice the RIGHT was doing this before the LEFT did. AND the
GOP has had congress now for4 months


and hasnt done ****. hasnt cut a dollar. not one. so your statement is
a meanigless cliche

The fact you fail to note it that the Democrats have basically "had
congress" for almost 50 years..

and most of the damage was done by the GOP with the feckless democrats
paralyzed by the class war the GOP is waging. so the GOP is MUCH more
effective at THEIR program of destroying america than the dems are at
saving it.


.. But you only want to blame it on the
republicans because they have had one of three parts of the leadership
triangle for four months.. The fact is, the democrats have been in
charge during the whole destruction of our economy.

the GOP had the congress for almost ALL of clinton's term and almost
ALL of bush' term and now has it in obama's

gee. you kind of ignored that didnt you?

and the GDP increases FASTER under the dems than under th GOP:

http://www.eriposte.com/economy/other/demovsrep.htm

so enough with the right wing bull****, OK? it's all wrong

On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 20:55:57 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:54:47 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 11:48:06 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 03:05:02 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 23:44:35 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

Reply:
The deficits are being driven up by overspending

the fact is the deficits are being driven up by bush's tax cuts. THEY
are the largest components of the deficit

your cliche is mindless babbling

REPLY:
Your racist cliché and Bush blame cliché is nothing but a cliché.

really? oh. i forgot. you right wingers have your myths and you dont
let evidence interfere with your delusions that the rich are the best
thing that's ever happened to the US.

well, there's always this:

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa...36&emailView=1

aw, damn, it shows the bush tax cuts are driving the deficit

that's a shame, right wnger, isn't it?

you say 'overspending' 'cuz you heard that on rush. it doesnt mean
anything but he said it so it MUST be true, right?



it's bush's fault because

1. he cut taxes especially on the rich

2. he increased spending by an unfunded drug program added to medicare

3. he increased spending by spending a trillion in iraq

4. he deregulated the markets so that wall street blew up the economy

and yet the right still blames

the black guy


The Bush tax cuts are about a quarter of the deficit (all of the
cuts, not just the $250k people).

gee. and that's exactly what i said. they are the LARGEST component.


Then you are wrong Bob. The tax cut on the $250k+ people is $700
billion over 10 years. The people less than $250k would pick up an
additional $3 trillion over 10 years. The whole nut was $3.7T over 10
years.

The whole nut is $370B a year. The deficit is $1.5T
Repealing ALL of them is a start but not a panacea.
You still need to find $1.13T, either in more revenue or cutting
spending. So far the fed's answer is to print money

gee. i notice the RIGHT was doing this before the LEFT did. AND the
GOP has had congress now for4 months
and hasnt done ****. hasnt cut a dollar. not one. so your statement is
a meanigless cliche

You have never heard me say Bush's economic policies or his wars were
anything but insanity so that one won't work here.
I agree the current congress is just as corrupt as the last 8

You forgot to add that it's Obama's fault.

On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 20:55:57 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:54:47 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 11:48:06 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 03:05:02 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 23:44:35 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:


well, there's always this:

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa...36&emailView=1

aw, damn, it shows the bush tax cuts are driving the deficit

that's a shame, right wnger, isn't it?

you say 'overspending' 'cuz you heard that on rush. it doesnt mean
anything but he said it so it MUST be true, right?



it's bush's fault because

1. he cut taxes especially on the rich

2. he increased spending by an unfunded drug program added to medicare

3. he increased spending by spending a trillion in iraq

4. he deregulated the markets so that wall street blew up the economy

and yet the right still blames

the black guy


The Bush tax cuts are about a quarter of the deficit (all of the
cuts, not just the $250k people).

gee. and that's exactly what i said. they are the LARGEST component.


Then you are wrong Bob. The tax cut on the $250k+ people is $700
billion over 10 years. The people less than $250k would pick up an
additional $3 trillion over 10 years. The whole nut was $3.7T over 10
years.

WHOA sports fans. the tax cuts included the middle class. the TOTAL
tax cuts amount to over 3.7 TRILLION and THAT is the largest component
of the deficit

AND 700 billion is nothing to sneeze at. the RICH CAUSED this problem
and got a bailout. it's time they paid for the damage they've caused.
why are THEY getting a free ride? why is the right so SOCIALIST??

i am NOT a socialist. the right is. i am NOT in favor of govt bailouts
for the rich. the right its. i am NOT in favor of TAX subsidiies for
the rich. the right is.

the RIGHT is SOCIALIST.

we need and END TO SOCIALISM. we need for the rich to start paying for
the damage they caused

On Sun, 01 May 2011 12:02:30 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 01 May 2011 01:14:24 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 20:55:57 -0400, wrote:

The Bush tax cuts are about a quarter of the deficit (all of the
cuts, not just the $250k people).

gee. and that's exactly what i said. they are the LARGEST component.


Then you are wrong Bob. The tax cut on the $250k+ people is $700
billion over 10 years. The people less than $250k would pick up an
additional $3 trillion over 10 years. The whole nut was $3.7T over 10
years.

WHOA sports fans. the tax cuts included the middle class. the TOTAL
tax cuts amount to over 3.7 TRILLION and THAT is the largest component
of the deficit

AND 700 billion is nothing to sneeze at. the RICH CAUSED this problem
and got a bailout. it's time they paid for the damage they've caused.
why are THEY getting a free ride? why is the right so SOCIALIST??


That is over 10 years. The $1.5T deficit is per year.

If you repeal the whole tax cut (very unlikely) it is still only a
quarter of the deficit, leaving us with a 1.13 trillion problem.

i absolutely agree.

Personally I think we should have let the rich eat the turd they gave
us but everyone said that was going to cause a depression

amazingly enough you're one of the few folks who seems to realize
this. that realization is completely absent in the tea party folks

.. The only
thing that makes that comment suspect is it was former Goldman Sachs
people saying it (the same ones who still advise the White House).
If it was Lehman people dominating the government policy I bet Goldman
would have gone down and Lehman would have been bailed out.

paul krugman also says it. unfortunately i think the 'too big to fail'
mentality has us permanently on the hook to those guys