On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 22:25:54 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article 29db3de8-e198-4859-bf21-b04c005ad248
, says...

Apparently, it is up to the Prez to determine which govt personnel are
"essential" to get paid and Clinton paid the military during the '95
shutdown. Obama has decided military are "nonessential" yet they are
required to work for possible pay later. Basically, Obama has decided
to make them work as slaves without compensation. DOES THIS SURPRISE
ANYBODY? Statists, regardless of what they claim, all believe in
slavery to the state. For Obama, "L'etat et Moi"

The republicans passed a stand alone bill to fund the military, Obama
bin Laden has decided to veto it...

let's see.

bush spent a trillion in iraq and killed 4400 US troops

obama's killed more terrorists in pakistan with drones than bush ever
did

but the right calls obama 'bin laden

THAT is proof of racism

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 22:25:54 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article 29db3de8-e198-4859-bf21-b04c005ad248
, says...

Apparently, it is up to the Prez to determine which govt personnel are
"essential" to get paid and Clinton paid the military during the '95
shutdown. Obama has decided military are "nonessential" yet they are
required to work for possible pay later. Basically, Obama has decided
to make them work as slaves without compensation. DOES THIS SURPRISE
ANYBODY? Statists, regardless of what they claim, all believe in
slavery to the state. For Obama, "L'etat et Moi"

The republicans passed a stand alone bill to fund the military, Obama
bin Laden has decided to veto it...

let's see.

bush spent a trillion in iraq and killed 4400 US troops

obama's killed more terrorists in pakistan with drones than bush ever
did

but the right calls obama 'bin laden

THAT is proof of racism

The problem here is you are just not intelligent enough to understand
that other folks can see the same set of facts from a different point of
view. As to "the war" Obama promised to end it, he has not, he has
expanded it in some ways, killing enough civilians to get Pakastan to
tell us to leave, he engineered the Egypt eruption and sparked the
unrest in the Middle East, after killing our own oil resources at home.
What about his promise to keep oil prices low, close Gitmo, be open
about who is visiting the Whitehouse?

Someday when you get by your red herring of "racist", and involve your
brain in the debate, you might be taken seriously. Until then, you are
just a typical, non-empathetic, selfish, self indulgent, progressive
with no need or desire to understand others rights and needs...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:59:21 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...


The republicans passed a stand alone bill to fund the military, Obama
bin Laden has decided to veto it...

let's see.

bush spent a trillion in iraq and killed 4400 US troops

obama's killed more terrorists in pakistan with drones than bush ever
did

but the right calls obama 'bin laden

THAT is proof of racism

The problem here is you are just not intelligent enough to understand
that other folks can see the same set of facts from a different point of
view.

now let's see. you called the pres of the US 'bin laden'

and then you **** your diapers when someone has the EVIDENCE to
bitchslap your racist ass??

HAHAHAHAHAAH

As to "the war" Obama promised to end it, he has not, he has
expanded it in some ways, killing enough civilians to get Pakastan to
tell us to leave,

yeah. he's aggressive. doesnt do much for your racist view of him as a
traitor, does it, kluxer?

see...this is where you get yourself in trouble. you're not too
bright. you depend on a steady stream of bull**** from the guys whose
asses you suck...glen and rush

so you spew your racist hatred of obama...that he's not
aggressive...that he's a traitor

THEN when it's shown he IS aggressive, you move the goal posts.

THAT is proof of racism


he engineered the Egypt eruption and sparked the
unrest in the Middle East, after killing our own oil resources at home.

and THAT is ALSO racism

you think arabs are stupid? that they cant fight for their freedom?
you think obama's wrong for NOT wanting us to get in ANOTHER war??

how many freakin' wars do you right wingers want??

What about his promise to keep oil prices low, close Gitmo, be open
about who is visiting the Whitehouse?

gee. let's see. he proposed closing gitmo. and congress's response?
filibuster after filibuster. in fact a RECORD number of filibusters

but at least NOW you're discussing POLICY which you REFUSED to do
before, characterizing the president as 'bin laden'.

you should be ASHAMED of that. THAT is why our country is so
polarized. while i believe bush was a tool of wall street and didnt
give a damn about working people, i NEVER thought he was a TRAITOR

YOU think the president IS a traitor. THAT is racist


Someday when you get by your red herring of "racist", and involve your
brain in the debate, you might be taken seriously. Until then, you are
just a typical, non-empathetic, selfish, self indulgent, progressive
with no need or desire to understand others rights and needs...

yeah. go ahead and pee your pants, hoping that rush will lead you out
of the darkness

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:59:21 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...


The republicans passed a stand alone bill to fund the military, Obama
bin Laden has decided to veto it...

let's see.

bush spent a trillion in iraq and killed 4400 US troops

obama's killed more terrorists in pakistan with drones than bush ever
did

but the right calls obama 'bin laden

THAT is proof of racism

The problem here is you are just not intelligent enough to understand
that other folks can see the same set of facts from a different point of
view.

now let's see. you called the pres of the US 'bin laden'

and then you **** your diapers when someone has the EVIDENCE to
bitchslap your racist ass??

This is where your argument loses completely.

I_am_Tosk wrote:


The problem here is you are just not intelligent enough...

Now *that* is rich. Scott Ingersoll, arguably the dumbest poster in
rec.boats, commenting on the intelligence of someone else.

On 4/7/2011 7:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 14:03:12 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Apparently, it is up to the Prez to determine which govt personnel are
"essential" to get paid and Clinton paid the military during the '95
shutdown. Obama has decided military are "nonessential" yet they are
required to work for possible pay later. Basically, Obama has decided
to make them work as slaves without compensation. DOES THIS SURPRISE
ANYBODY? Statists, regardless of what they claim, all believe in
slavery to the state. For Obama, "L'etat et Moi"


No government employees have lost a dime in these shutdowns. If they
get a check, the check might be late but if it is a bank transfer it
will probably be right on time. They have always been given their back
pay, even though most stay home.

Think about that while you are locked out of the Smithsonian ... you
are still paying these people, to stay home.


A shutdown because Boehner doesn't have the backbone to stand up to the
teahadists. :)

On 07/04/2011 5:44 PM, paul@byc wrote:
On 4/7/2011 7:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 14:03:12 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Apparently, it is up to the Prez to determine which govt personnel are
"essential" to get paid and Clinton paid the military during the '95
shutdown. Obama has decided military are "nonessential" yet they are
required to work for possible pay later. Basically, Obama has decided
to make them work as slaves without compensation. DOES THIS SURPRISE
ANYBODY? Statists, regardless of what they claim, all believe in
slavery to the state. For Obama, "L'etat et Moi"


No government employees have lost a dime in these shutdowns. If they
get a check, the check might be late but if it is a bank transfer it
will probably be right on time. They have always been given their back
pay, even though most stay home.

Think about that while you are locked out of the Smithsonian ... you
are still paying these people, to stay home.


A shutdown because Boehner doesn't have the backbone to stand up to the
teahadists. :)

Hey what is he going to do? Print more money?

Hahaha... you don't know how screwed up US currency mismanagement is.
Even though as I write the currency has been dropping value almost daily.

Your screwed no mater what. Short of a $1.6 trillion reduction in
spending plan starting right now, US currency is toast.

On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:58:21 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 07/04/2011 5:44 PM, paul@byc wrote:
On 4/7/2011 7:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 14:03:12 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Apparently, it is up to the Prez to determine which govt personnel are
"essential" to get paid and Clinton paid the military during the '95
shutdown. Obama has decided military are "nonessential" yet they are
required to work for possible pay later. Basically, Obama has decided
to make them work as slaves without compensation. DOES THIS SURPRISE
ANYBODY? Statists, regardless of what they claim, all believe in
slavery to the state. For Obama, "L'etat et Moi"


No government employees have lost a dime in these shutdowns. If they
get a check, the check might be late but if it is a bank transfer it
will probably be right on time. They have always been given their back
pay, even though most stay home.

Think about that while you are locked out of the Smithsonian ... you
are still paying these people, to stay home.


A shutdown because Boehner doesn't have the backbone to stand up to the
teahadists. :)

Hey what is he going to do? Print more money?

Hahaha... you don't know how screwed up US currency mismanagement is.
Even though as I write the currency has been dropping value almost daily.

yep. we have a more laissez faire economy than you do. we have less
regulation than you do

our rich can do things to **** the economy that your rich guys cant


Your screwed no mater what. Short of a $1.6 trillion reduction in
spending plan starting right now, US currency is toast.

In article , says...

On 4/7/2011 7:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 14:03:12 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Apparently, it is up to the Prez to determine which govt personnel are
"essential" to get paid and Clinton paid the military during the '95
shutdown. Obama has decided military are "nonessential" yet they are
required to work for possible pay later. Basically, Obama has decided
to make them work as slaves without compensation. DOES THIS SURPRISE
ANYBODY? Statists, regardless of what they claim, all believe in
slavery to the state. For Obama, "L'etat et Moi"


No government employees have lost a dime in these shutdowns. If they
get a check, the check might be late but if it is a bank transfer it
will probably be right on time. They have always been given their back
pay, even though most stay home.

Think about that while you are locked out of the Smithsonian ... you
are still paying these people, to stay home.


A shutdown because Boehner doesn't have the backbone to stand up to the
teahadists. :)

A shutdown because the democrats didn't have the balls to pass a budget
last ****ing year.. All afraid to take a stand before an election, line
'em up against a wall, ****ing traitors like you and Harry...

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese!

On Apr 7, 10:27*pm, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In article , says...





On 4/7/2011 7:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 14:03:12 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
*wrote:

Apparently, it is up to the Prez to determine which govt personnel are
"essential" to get paid and Clinton paid the military during the '95
shutdown. *Obama has decided military are "nonessential" yet they are
required to work for possible pay later. *Basically, Obama has decided
to make them work as slaves without compensation. *DOES THIS SURPRISE
ANYBODY? *Statists, regardless of what they claim, all believe in
slavery to the state. *For Obama, "L'etat et Moi"

No government employees have lost a dime in these shutdowns. If they
get a check, the check might be late but if it is a bank transfer it
will probably be right on time. They have always been given their back
pay, even though most stay home.

Think about that while you are locked out of the Smithsonian ... you
are still paying these people, to stay home.

A shutdown because Boehner doesn't have the backbone to stand up to the
teahadists. *:)

A shutdown because the democrats didn't have the balls to pass a budget
last ****ing year.. All afraid to take a stand before an election, line
'em up against a wall, ****ing traitors like you and Harry...

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese!

Shut it down and watch the cancer die. Some good cells will also die
but the body may survive.