On Apr 6, 3:32*pm, Harryk wrote:
Jack. wrote:
On Apr 6, 3:06 pm, *wrote:
Jack. wrote:
On Apr 6, 2:39 pm, * *wrote:
It ain't over until it is over, but for two candidates to be a couple of
hundred votes apart when more than a million votes were cast...amazing.
If Kloppenburg wins, it will be a stiff repudiation of the state's
republican governor. The gov's man also lost in a race to run the
Milwaukee county government.
A "stiff repudiation" would be a landslide win. *A win by 200 votes
out of a million is a dead heat, and is statistically insignificant.
Virtually half the state supports the governor.
One has to wonder how much the *unions* spent on the election. *:-
The Repubs outspent the Dems.

There's no doubt that union money and thugs put the dems over the top
and in the lead. *There was a lot at stake for them. *That and a
little ACORN action, eh?

We've seen it before just a couple of years ago. *The dems have a new
playbook on cheating.

Whoops...analysis from the post:

Why the left’s showing in Wisconsin Supreme Court race is a big deal
By Greg Sargent

Greg Sargent? A far left whacko and apologist. Meaningless tripe.


And the Republicans may have outspent the Dems, but when you add in
the *union* money spent, that puts the Dems over the top. The union
pulled out all the stops on this one, and apparently could only pull
it out by 200 votes.