Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/04/2011 6:13 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:11:08 -0600, wrote: On 05/04/2011 2:01 PM, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 14:48:28 -0400, wrote: wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:28:41 -0600, wrote: Agreed, be it 3 years or a 100. But the land was cheap. Isn't just New Orleans either, all over the world with more and more people, more people live it flood areas, volcanoes and fault lines. I live in a FEMA flood area, although we have not had a flood here for the 150 year recorded history (and who knows when it was just indians) FEMA will still require that if I do anything to my house that is more than 50% of the appraised building price, I need to tear it down and build 4 feet higher than I am now. This has shocked more than a few of my neighbors since the houses are appraised unrealistically low. Most houses have an effective cap of around $30,000-40,000 on any additions or repairs. Well, then, insist the assessors re-appraise your house at market value. The problem is land value vs house value. In many waterfront areas around here a vacant lot will sell for about the same price as a lot with an older but quite livable house. Some people prefer a vacant lot because they don't need to start with a tear down. So people buy them, wait for the weather to trash it and get federal moneys for bailout. That looked like a bad bet to me. Flood and windstorm will cost you about $4,000 a year for $100,000 in coverage and there will still be a several thousand dollar deductible for a storm that might not happen that often or cause that much damage. Insurance is about amortization of risk. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:43:06 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 05/04/2011 6:13 PM, wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:11:08 -0600, wrote: On 05/04/2011 2:01 PM, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 14:48:28 -0400, wrote: wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:28:41 -0600, wrote: Agreed, be it 3 years or a 100. But the land was cheap. Isn't just New Orleans either, all over the world with more and more people, more people live it flood areas, volcanoes and fault lines. I live in a FEMA flood area, although we have not had a flood here for the 150 year recorded history (and who knows when it was just indians) FEMA will still require that if I do anything to my house that is more than 50% of the appraised building price, I need to tear it down and build 4 feet higher than I am now. This has shocked more than a few of my neighbors since the houses are appraised unrealistically low. Most houses have an effective cap of around $30,000-40,000 on any additions or repairs. Well, then, insist the assessors re-appraise your house at market value. The problem is land value vs house value. In many waterfront areas around here a vacant lot will sell for about the same price as a lot with an older but quite livable house. Some people prefer a vacant lot because they don't need to start with a tear down. So people buy them, wait for the weather to trash it and get federal moneys for bailout. That looked like a bad bet to me. Flood and windstorm will cost you about $4,000 a year for $100,000 in coverage and there will still be a several thousand dollar deductible for a storm that might not happen that often or cause that much damage. Insurance is about amortization of risk. Wow. insightful. I bet you went to high school. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More preparations | General | |||
Storm at Sea - Powerpoint presentation - File 1 of 1 - storm-op-zee.pps (01/13) | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Joe could get 21-28 feet of storm surge | ASA | |||
What if: Hurricane Storm surge in NYC | General | |||
CHARLEY - STORM SURGE FLOODING 10'-13' POSSIBLE | ASA |