| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp
NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Mar 24, 11:46*pm, TopBassDog wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. *This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. *while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving *the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 3/25/2011 7:27 AM, Tim wrote:
On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. The American president can't keep his nose out of other peoples business. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
OmDeFlume wrote:
On 3/25/2011 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. The American president can't keep his nose out of other peoples business. Wow...we have a new ID thief "loogy." Buh-bye, asshole...you're going right into the filter. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Mar 24, 11:46*pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. *This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. *while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving *the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 24/03/2011 10:46 PM, TopBassDog wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat Maybe it is because they trust the Muslim president. Follow this. Egypt is going Muslim Brotherhood. Libya rebels are al-Qaeda associates. Ivory Coast UN man is Muslim/Colonial friendly. Dozens of other nations like this in the US-UN-France mess. Read up on Rwanda for the last time this happened, and locals know it is doom to let it happen to them in the Ivory Coast. Hey, Obama might have said he became a Christian at 27, but he acts like a Muslim. Know that in Islam it is ok to deceive infidels. And US is being economically destroyed with debt and unemployment. Obama didn't see why building a mosque on the ash fall zone of 9/11 was wrong. Hopefully the US gets a better president in 2012. Or impeach this one for war without cause and assassination attempts. Maybe Ashley Turton knew too much? Or perhaps John Wheeler? China, Russia and India are now allies, stating they are against US-UN-France conquest and backing of terrorism. And it is known US-UN-France operatives are in all these countries supporting terrorism, rebelion, funding the UN man. One thing is for sure, not all is as it seems. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 25/03/2011 5:27 AM, Tim wrote:
On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. Why? I could have predicted it. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 25/03/2011 6:44 AM, John H wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. Saudi will not say boo and are quietly smilling. Saudi Arabia is a major player behind this. US taxpayers get the bill, Saudi enjoy having no threats in the middle east courtesy of American blood and American taxpayers money-debt do it all. From a Saudi perspective this is great. No local interfereance in Saudi stuff because the other countries are in a mess or in colonial Europe's control. From a long term perpective Saudi are setting up US to have no allies but Israel and even Israel is skidish right now on US commitment. US Foreign policy is in the biggest mess ever. Economically, puts the US into more debt, gets congress to sell the farm for debt. Saudis know with many trillions of USD in their control from Carlye group of GM fame, to the NYSE they hold US fate in their hands. Dump $5 trillion USD and watch what happens to the US economy. blackmail of sorts. Bush bailed out GM-Carlye as Bin Laden family had deposits there. Obama has been a good back room boy and stepped up the corruption. Ever ask yourself why in Yemen and Behrain that a government sniper can kill 52 unarmed protesters in one protest and Obama backs armed al_Quada associates in Libya? Ocam had it right, the simplest explanation, Obama is not in your best interests. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:13:59 -0400, Harryk
wrote: OmDeFlume wrote: On 3/25/2011 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. The American president can't keep his nose out of other peoples business. Wow...we have a new ID thief "loogy." Buh-bye, asshole...you're going right into the filter. He's the same child that's done it before I'm sure. He thinks it makes him look cool or fools people into thinking he's all grown up or something. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John H
wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46*pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. *This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. *while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving *the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 10:46 PM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat Maybe it is because they trust the Muslim president. Follow this. Egypt is going Muslim Brotherhood. Libya rebels are al-Qaeda associates. Ivory Coast UN man is Muslim/Colonial friendly. Dozens of other nations like this in the US-UN-France mess. Read up on Rwanda for the last time this happened, and locals know it is doom to let it happen to them in the Ivory Coast. Hey, Obama might have said he became a Christian at 27, but he acts like a Muslim. Know that in Islam it is ok to deceive infidels. And US is being economically destroyed with debt and unemployment. Obama didn't see why building a mosque on the ash fall zone of 9/11 was wrong. Hopefully the US gets a better president in 2012. Or impeach this one for war without cause and assassination attempts. Maybe Ashley Turton knew too much? Or perhaps John Wheeler? China, Russia and India are now allies, stating they are against US-UN-France conquest and backing of terrorism. And it is known US-UN-France operatives are in all these countries supporting terrorism, rebelion, funding the UN man. One thing is for sure, not all is as it seems. Your post is so much bat**** bull****, it is hard to know where to begin. 1. Obama is not a muslim. Your constant harping on this is as non-sensical as the similar idiotic comments made in 1961 when Kennedy was running for president and your earlier day counterparts whined that he was a catholic and therefore under the thumb of the pope. That was a bull**** comment then, and yours are bull**** comments now. 2. We'd be far better off if presidential candidates were forbidden to discuss their religious beliefs. Superstition is not a trait I find admirable in a seeker of high political office. 3. The directions other countries take is a matter for the citizens of those countries to make. 4. Your boy Bush, a christian fundamentalist, deceived everyone. 5. The "ash zone" of the aftermath of 9-11 went well beyond the boundaries of Manhattan. Besides, it wasn't the muslim religion that destroyed those buildings; it was bunch of fundamentalist nutcases. Up to that point the worst such terrorist attack within the borders of the United States was committed by McVeigh, a christian fundamentalist. I'll bet you wouldn't object to a christian church being built within the "ash zone" of the Oklahoma City bombing. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 25/03/2011 10:11 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote: On 24/03/2011 10:46 PM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat Maybe it is because they trust the Muslim president. Follow this. Egypt is going Muslim Brotherhood. Libya rebels are al-Qaeda associates. Ivory Coast UN man is Muslim/Colonial friendly. Dozens of other nations like this in the US-UN-France mess. Read up on Rwanda for the last time this happened, and locals know it is doom to let it happen to them in the Ivory Coast. Hey, Obama might have said he became a Christian at 27, but he acts like a Muslim. Know that in Islam it is ok to deceive infidels. And US is being economically destroyed with debt and unemployment. Obama didn't see why building a mosque on the ash fall zone of 9/11 was wrong. Hopefully the US gets a better president in 2012. Or impeach this one for war without cause and assassination attempts. Maybe Ashley Turton knew too much? Or perhaps John Wheeler? China, Russia and India are now allies, stating they are against US-UN-France conquest and backing of terrorism. And it is known US-UN-France operatives are in all these countries supporting terrorism, rebelion, funding the UN man. One thing is for sure, not all is as it seems. Your post is so much bat**** bull****, it is hard to know where to begin. 1. Obama is not a muslim. Your constant harping on this is as non-sensical as the similar idiotic comments made in 1961 when Kennedy was running for president and your earlier day counterparts whined that he was a catholic and therefore under the thumb of the pope. That was a bull**** comment then, and yours are bull**** comments now. 2. We'd be far better off if presidential candidates were forbidden to discuss their religious beliefs. Superstition is not a trait I find admirable in a seeker of high political office. 3. The directions other countries take is a matter for the citizens of those countries to make. 4. Your boy Bush, a christian fundamentalist, deceived everyone. 5. The "ash zone" of the aftermath of 9-11 went well beyond the boundaries of Manhattan. Besides, it wasn't the muslim religion that destroyed those buildings; it was bunch of fundamentalist nutcases. Up to that point the worst such terrorist attack within the borders of the United States was committed by McVeigh, a christian fundamentalist. I'll bet you wouldn't object to a christian church being built within the "ash zone" of the Oklahoma City bombing. Obama was born a Muslim, get over it. Denial of reality must be frustrating or is ignorance bliss? I agree. Separation of church and state is good. No stable government is possible without it. Less deception from Bush than Obama. The mosque was not more than a few blocks away. Maybe this will help your feeble mind. I will even suggest it was intentional. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wo...e_location.jpg |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:11:03 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 25/03/2011 9:59 AM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all. There i a reason Osama Bin Laden has never been caught. Osama be proud of Obama. In your paranoid fantasy world, I'm sure he's guilty of something. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:34:02 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 25/03/2011 10:11 AM, Harryk wrote: Canuck57 wrote: On 24/03/2011 10:46 PM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat Maybe it is because they trust the Muslim president. Follow this. Egypt is going Muslim Brotherhood. Libya rebels are al-Qaeda associates. Ivory Coast UN man is Muslim/Colonial friendly. Dozens of other nations like this in the US-UN-France mess. Read up on Rwanda for the last time this happened, and locals know it is doom to let it happen to them in the Ivory Coast. Hey, Obama might have said he became a Christian at 27, but he acts like a Muslim. Know that in Islam it is ok to deceive infidels. And US is being economically destroyed with debt and unemployment. Obama didn't see why building a mosque on the ash fall zone of 9/11 was wrong. Hopefully the US gets a better president in 2012. Or impeach this one for war without cause and assassination attempts. Maybe Ashley Turton knew too much? Or perhaps John Wheeler? China, Russia and India are now allies, stating they are against US-UN-France conquest and backing of terrorism. And it is known US-UN-France operatives are in all these countries supporting terrorism, rebelion, funding the UN man. One thing is for sure, not all is as it seems. Your post is so much bat**** bull****, it is hard to know where to begin. 1. Obama is not a muslim. Your constant harping on this is as non-sensical as the similar idiotic comments made in 1961 when Kennedy was running for president and your earlier day counterparts whined that he was a catholic and therefore under the thumb of the pope. That was a bull**** comment then, and yours are bull**** comments now. 2. We'd be far better off if presidential candidates were forbidden to discuss their religious beliefs. Superstition is not a trait I find admirable in a seeker of high political office. 3. The directions other countries take is a matter for the citizens of those countries to make. 4. Your boy Bush, a christian fundamentalist, deceived everyone. 5. The "ash zone" of the aftermath of 9-11 went well beyond the boundaries of Manhattan. Besides, it wasn't the muslim religion that destroyed those buildings; it was bunch of fundamentalist nutcases. Up to that point the worst such terrorist attack within the borders of the United States was committed by McVeigh, a christian fundamentalist. I'll bet you wouldn't object to a christian church being built within the "ash zone" of the Oklahoma City bombing. Obama was born a Muslim, get over it. Denial of reality must be frustrating or is ignorance bliss? I agree. Separation of church and state is good. No stable government is possible without it. Less deception from Bush than Obama. The mosque was not more than a few blocks away. Maybe this will help your feeble mind. I will even suggest it was intentional. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wo...e_location.jpg Bush lied about a war of choice that caused the needless deaths of tens of thousands of people. I guess the strip club even closer to ground zero is ok with you, because it represents your narrow view of the world. Of course, there's also St. Nicholas Church also, not to mention another mosques in the general area. Please tell us how far away is acceptable for a community center. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Mar 25, 11:59*am, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us.... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all. Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop. How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah and praise the country of which he's the president. Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous stupidity. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
John H wrote:
Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop. How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah and praise the country of which he's the president. Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous stupidity. Speaking of stupidity, herring, you're only a baby step in intelligence above your fellow right-wing racists here. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote: On Mar 25, 11:59*am, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all. Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop. How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah and praise the country of which he's the president. Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous stupidity. Ah yes, another bit of racist nonsense from a right-wing moron. Despite your stupidity, you have the right to declare it as often as you like. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
|
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
I_am_Tosk wrote:
In , says... John H wrote: Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop. How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah and praise the country of which he's the president. Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous stupidity. Speaking of stupidity, herring, you're only a baby step in intelligence above your fellow right-wing racists here. Over 40 insults from you to other posters here today alone.. How do you ever expect anyone to believe you are not the cause of the problems here? Are you counting herring's insults, little man of no value? |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
"Gene" wrote in message ... On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. That's paranoid, but would be a wise course, for them.... Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. Since nearly all of the 911 attackers were from Saudi Arabia.... been there done that..... Bottom Line? give people a taste of freedom and self determination and things will take their own course. The Libyans (unlike the Iraqis) are the best current example of folks willing to fight and die for that cause. Morally, we owe them a bit of help..... and should NOT turn our backs on them the way we did the Poles in WWII..... To place this in historical perspective... we should be eternally grateful to the French for providing damn near every grain of powder fired by US during the American Revolution..... otherwise you'd be speaking British, today.... ************* Speaking British might be a vast improvement over what comes out of the mouths of Kevin, Scotty and some of the other dopers in this newsgroup. ;-) |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:57:12 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46*pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. *This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. *while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving *the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. That's paranoid, but would be a wise course, for them.... Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. Since nearly all of the 911 attackers were from Saudi Arabia.... been there done that..... Bottom Line? give people a taste of freedom and self determination and things will take their own course. The Libyans (unlike the Iraqis) are the best current example of folks willing to fight and die for that cause. Morally, we owe them a bit of help..... and should NOT turn our backs on them the way we did the Poles in WWII..... To place this in historical perspective... we should be eternally grateful to the French for providing damn near every grain of powder fired by US during the American Revolution..... otherwise you'd be speaking British, today.... Well, my gosh. It's nice to know you have such a great warmth for all those rebels everywhere. I sure as hell hope you're right and they're all 'good guys'! |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#% |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:57:06 -0400, Lil Abner wrote:
On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#% Drive what? The military, in this country anyway, answers to the political infrastructure. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 3/25/2011 7:14 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:57:06 -0400, Lil wrote: On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#% Drive what? The military, in this country anyway, answers to the political infrastructure. The Military hasn't been allowed to fulfill, it's implied mission, victory. Defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory, in Viet Nam thanks to Kerry, Fonda and Fifth Columnists efforts here. We have wasted lives and money in Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan, etc. We have no mission goal in Libya although we assume we want to win??? something. The goal should be American independent of what the UN or anyone else declares. If we are going to expend our Money and risk our Military then let's win. Let's go deliberately about getting rid of Qaddafi's forces right now. Let's not let alQuaeda or other hostiles take charge, of what we won. We on it lets make sure Libyans, friendly, to the US and dedicated to running Libya not exporting terror run the Country. to all the idiots that scream imperialism or other junk are not our friends and we really don't give a hoot what they say. It's about time US Leaders did a little succeeding. Let our Military do it's job. Ask the Professionals what they need and let them get the job done. It will be cheaper by far, in the long run, and we get something done. no more half assing in Washington. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:00:37 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:25:39 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:57:12 -0400, Gene wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46*pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. *This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. *while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving *the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. That's paranoid, but would be a wise course, for them.... Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. Since nearly all of the 911 attackers were from Saudi Arabia.... been there done that..... Bottom Line? give people a taste of freedom and self determination and things will take their own course. The Libyans (unlike the Iraqis) are the best current example of folks willing to fight and die for that cause. Morally, we owe them a bit of help..... and should NOT turn our backs on them the way we did the Poles in WWII..... To place this in historical perspective... we should be eternally grateful to the French for providing damn near every grain of powder fired by US during the American Revolution..... otherwise you'd be speaking British, today.... Well, my gosh. It's nice to know you have such a great warmth for all those rebels everywhere. I sure as hell hope you're right and they're all 'good guys'! I am, also, not Pollyanna... I hope so, too.... sometimes you just have to give it your best shot and hope your best guess won't come back and slap you silly.... I guess erring on the positive side is better than doing nothing.... however, the "fool me once" caveat kicks in and we don't get silly twice.... If Afghanistan is once...and it is, then Libya is twice. Even Gen Ham can't answer the questions he's given. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 3/25/2011 11:59 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all. Dear, you are talking gibberish. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 25/03/2011 1:43 PM, John H wrote:
On Mar 25, 11:59 am, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all. Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop. How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah and praise the country of which he's the president. Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous stupidity. Scary part, the idiot might have is is going to breed. What a thought. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 25/03/2011 2:25 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT), John H wrote: On Mar 25, 11:59 am, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all. Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop. How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah and praise the country of which he's the president. Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous stupidity. Ah yes, another bit of racist nonsense from a right-wing moron. Despite your stupidity, you have the right to declare it as often as you like. You still haven't told us, is bringing up race an excuse or a reason? |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 25/03/2011 3:57 PM, Gene wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. That's paranoid, but would be a wise course, for them.... Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. Since nearly all of the 911 attackers were from Saudi Arabia.... been there done that..... Bottom Line? give people a taste of freedom and self determination and things will take their own course. The Libyans (unlike the Iraqis) are the best current example of folks willing to fight and die for that cause. Morally, we owe them a bit of help..... and should NOT turn our backs on them the way we did the Poles in WWII..... To place this in historical perspective... we should be eternally grateful to the French for providing damn near every grain of powder fired by US during the American Revolution..... otherwise you'd be speaking British, today.... You might want not to get too cozy with the French. The French resistance was worried more about their own people than the Nazi as many looked for reasons to get favors out them, by turning in their own. Lots of German genes in Paris today because of that. But Obama supporting al-Qaedea affiliates? That does cross the line. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 25/03/2011 1:12 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:34:02 -0600, wrote: On 25/03/2011 10:11 AM, Harryk wrote: Canuck57 wrote: On 24/03/2011 10:46 PM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat Maybe it is because they trust the Muslim president. Follow this. Egypt is going Muslim Brotherhood. Libya rebels are al-Qaeda associates. Ivory Coast UN man is Muslim/Colonial friendly. Dozens of other nations like this in the US-UN-France mess. Read up on Rwanda for the last time this happened, and locals know it is doom to let it happen to them in the Ivory Coast. Hey, Obama might have said he became a Christian at 27, but he acts like a Muslim. Know that in Islam it is ok to deceive infidels. And US is being economically destroyed with debt and unemployment. Obama didn't see why building a mosque on the ash fall zone of 9/11 was wrong. Hopefully the US gets a better president in 2012. Or impeach this one for war without cause and assassination attempts. Maybe Ashley Turton knew too much? Or perhaps John Wheeler? China, Russia and India are now allies, stating they are against US-UN-France conquest and backing of terrorism. And it is known US-UN-France operatives are in all these countries supporting terrorism, rebelion, funding the UN man. One thing is for sure, not all is as it seems. Your post is so much bat**** bull****, it is hard to know where to begin. 1. Obama is not a muslim. Your constant harping on this is as non-sensical as the similar idiotic comments made in 1961 when Kennedy was running for president and your earlier day counterparts whined that he was a catholic and therefore under the thumb of the pope. That was a bull**** comment then, and yours are bull**** comments now. 2. We'd be far better off if presidential candidates were forbidden to discuss their religious beliefs. Superstition is not a trait I find admirable in a seeker of high political office. 3. The directions other countries take is a matter for the citizens of those countries to make. 4. Your boy Bush, a christian fundamentalist, deceived everyone. 5. The "ash zone" of the aftermath of 9-11 went well beyond the boundaries of Manhattan. Besides, it wasn't the muslim religion that destroyed those buildings; it was bunch of fundamentalist nutcases. Up to that point the worst such terrorist attack within the borders of the United States was committed by McVeigh, a christian fundamentalist. I'll bet you wouldn't object to a christian church being built within the "ash zone" of the Oklahoma City bombing. Obama was born a Muslim, get over it. Denial of reality must be frustrating or is ignorance bliss? I agree. Separation of church and state is good. No stable government is possible without it. Less deception from Bush than Obama. The mosque was not more than a few blocks away. Maybe this will help your feeble mind. I will even suggest it was intentional. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wo...e_location.jpg Bush lied about a war of choice that caused the needless deaths of tens of thousands of people. I guess the strip club even closer to ground zero is ok with you, because it represents your narrow view of the world. Of course, there's also St. Nicholas Church also, not to mention another mosques in the general area. Please tell us how far away is acceptable for a community center. Nope, he didn't lie. Congress, Dim and GOP both agreed too. Get over it. Still hanging on to the idea it is all Bushes fault? Hey, why not blame Abraham Lincoln or George Washington, or Thomas Jefferson? Or maybe even Jesus Christ? At least 2 miles. If the Muslims can't walk that far, well, get into shape or turn in would be bombers. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:20:59 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 25/03/2011 2:25 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT), John H wrote: On Mar 25, 11:59 am, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all. Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop. How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah and praise the country of which he's the president. Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous stupidity. Ah yes, another bit of racist nonsense from a right-wing moron. Despite your stupidity, you have the right to declare it as often as you like. You still haven't told us, is bringing up race an excuse or a reason? You've already told us you're a racist. You don't have to keep telling us. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:19:26 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 25/03/2011 1:43 PM, John H wrote: On Mar 25, 11:59 am, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all. Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop. How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah and praise the country of which he's the president. Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous stupidity. Scary part, the idiot might have is is going to breed. What a thought. Perhaps you should let the "thought" get a bit more coherent before you post it... in English not gibberish. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:29:25 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 25/03/2011 1:12 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:34:02 -0600, wrote: On 25/03/2011 10:11 AM, Harryk wrote: Canuck57 wrote: On 24/03/2011 10:46 PM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat Maybe it is because they trust the Muslim president. Follow this. Egypt is going Muslim Brotherhood. Libya rebels are al-Qaeda associates. Ivory Coast UN man is Muslim/Colonial friendly. Dozens of other nations like this in the US-UN-France mess. Read up on Rwanda for the last time this happened, and locals know it is doom to let it happen to them in the Ivory Coast. Hey, Obama might have said he became a Christian at 27, but he acts like a Muslim. Know that in Islam it is ok to deceive infidels. And US is being economically destroyed with debt and unemployment. Obama didn't see why building a mosque on the ash fall zone of 9/11 was wrong. Hopefully the US gets a better president in 2012. Or impeach this one for war without cause and assassination attempts. Maybe Ashley Turton knew too much? Or perhaps John Wheeler? China, Russia and India are now allies, stating they are against US-UN-France conquest and backing of terrorism. And it is known US-UN-France operatives are in all these countries supporting terrorism, rebelion, funding the UN man. One thing is for sure, not all is as it seems. Your post is so much bat**** bull****, it is hard to know where to begin. 1. Obama is not a muslim. Your constant harping on this is as non-sensical as the similar idiotic comments made in 1961 when Kennedy was running for president and your earlier day counterparts whined that he was a catholic and therefore under the thumb of the pope. That was a bull**** comment then, and yours are bull**** comments now. 2. We'd be far better off if presidential candidates were forbidden to discuss their religious beliefs. Superstition is not a trait I find admirable in a seeker of high political office. 3. The directions other countries take is a matter for the citizens of those countries to make. 4. Your boy Bush, a christian fundamentalist, deceived everyone. 5. The "ash zone" of the aftermath of 9-11 went well beyond the boundaries of Manhattan. Besides, it wasn't the muslim religion that destroyed those buildings; it was bunch of fundamentalist nutcases. Up to that point the worst such terrorist attack within the borders of the United States was committed by McVeigh, a christian fundamentalist. I'll bet you wouldn't object to a christian church being built within the "ash zone" of the Oklahoma City bombing. Obama was born a Muslim, get over it. Denial of reality must be frustrating or is ignorance bliss? I agree. Separation of church and state is good. No stable government is possible without it. Less deception from Bush than Obama. The mosque was not more than a few blocks away. Maybe this will help your feeble mind. I will even suggest it was intentional. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wo...e_location.jpg Bush lied about a war of choice that caused the needless deaths of tens of thousands of people. I guess the strip club even closer to ground zero is ok with you, because it represents your narrow view of the world. Of course, there's also St. Nicholas Church also, not to mention another mosques in the general area. Please tell us how far away is acceptable for a community center. Nope, he didn't lie. Congress, Dim and GOP both agreed too. Get over it. Still hanging on to the idea it is all Bushes fault? Hey, why not blame Abraham Lincoln or George Washington, or Thomas Jefferson? Or maybe even Jesus Christ? At least 2 miles. If the Muslims can't walk that far, well, get into shape or turn in would be bombers. You're an idiot and a racist asshole. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:36:14 -0400, Lil Abner wrote:
On 3/25/2011 7:14 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:57:06 -0400, Lil wrote: On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#% Drive what? The military, in this country anyway, answers to the political infrastructure. The Military hasn't been allowed to fulfill, it's implied mission, victory. Defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory, in Viet Nam thanks to Kerry, Fonda and Fifth Columnists efforts here. We have wasted lives and money in Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan, etc. We have no mission goal in Libya although we assume we want to win??? something. The goal should be American independent of what the UN or anyone else declares. If we are going to expend our Money and risk our Military then let's win. Let's go deliberately about getting rid of Qaddafi's forces right now. Let's not let alQuaeda or other hostiles take charge, of what we won. We on it lets make sure Libyans, friendly, to the US and dedicated to running Libya not exporting terror run the Country. to all the idiots that scream imperialism or other junk are not our friends and we really don't give a hoot what they say. It's about time US Leaders did a little succeeding. Let our Military do it's job. Ask the Professionals what they need and let them get the job done. It will be cheaper by far, in the long run, and we get something done. no more half assing in Washington. You're a loony toony. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 3/25/2011 9:35 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:36:14 -0400, Lil wrote: On 3/25/2011 7:14 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:57:06 -0400, Lil wrote: On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#% Drive what? The military, in this country anyway, answers to the political infrastructure. The Military hasn't been allowed to fulfill, it's implied mission, victory. Defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory, in Viet Nam thanks to Kerry, Fonda and Fifth Columnists efforts here. We have wasted lives and money in Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan, etc. We have no mission goal in Libya although we assume we want to win??? something. The goal should be American independent of what the UN or anyone else declares. If we are going to expend our Money and risk our Military then let's win. Let's go deliberately about getting rid of Qaddafi's forces right now. Let's not let alQuaeda or other hostiles take charge, of what we won. We on it lets make sure Libyans, friendly, to the US and dedicated to running Libya not exporting terror run the Country. to all the idiots that scream imperialism or other junk are not our friends and we really don't give a hoot what they say. It's about time US Leaders did a little succeeding. Let our Military do it's job. Ask the Professionals what they need and let them get the job done. It will be cheaper by far, in the long run, and we get something done. no more half assing in Washington. You're a loony toony. You're toony loone. Not a bright one either. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:42:29 -0400, Lil Abner wrote:
On 3/25/2011 9:35 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:36:14 -0400, Lil wrote: On 3/25/2011 7:14 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:57:06 -0400, Lil wrote: On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#% Drive what? The military, in this country anyway, answers to the political infrastructure. The Military hasn't been allowed to fulfill, it's implied mission, victory. Defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory, in Viet Nam thanks to Kerry, Fonda and Fifth Columnists efforts here. We have wasted lives and money in Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan, etc. We have no mission goal in Libya although we assume we want to win??? something. The goal should be American independent of what the UN or anyone else declares. If we are going to expend our Money and risk our Military then let's win. Let's go deliberately about getting rid of Qaddafi's forces right now. Let's not let alQuaeda or other hostiles take charge, of what we won. We on it lets make sure Libyans, friendly, to the US and dedicated to running Libya not exporting terror run the Country. to all the idiots that scream imperialism or other junk are not our friends and we really don't give a hoot what they say. It's about time US Leaders did a little succeeding. Let our Military do it's job. Ask the Professionals what they need and let them get the job done. It will be cheaper by far, in the long run, and we get something done. no more half assing in Washington. You're a loony toony. You're toony loone. Not a bright one either. You're the one who's ranting. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 3/25/2011 11:54 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:42:29 -0400, Lil wrote: On 3/25/2011 9:35 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:36:14 -0400, Lil wrote: On 3/25/2011 7:14 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:57:06 -0400, Lil wrote: On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#% Drive what? The military, in this country anyway, answers to the political infrastructure. The Military hasn't been allowed to fulfill, it's implied mission, victory. Defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory, in Viet Nam thanks to Kerry, Fonda and Fifth Columnists efforts here. We have wasted lives and money in Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan, etc. We have no mission goal in Libya although we assume we want to win??? something. The goal should be American independent of what the UN or anyone else declares. If we are going to expend our Money and risk our Military then let's win. Let's go deliberately about getting rid of Qaddafi's forces right now. Let's not let alQuaeda or other hostiles take charge, of what we won. We on it lets make sure Libyans, friendly, to the US and dedicated to running Libya not exporting terror run the Country. to all the idiots that scream imperialism or other junk are not our friends and we really don't give a hoot what they say. It's about time US Leaders did a little succeeding. Let our Military do it's job. Ask the Professionals what they need and let them get the job done. It will be cheaper by far, in the long run, and we get something done. no more half assing in Washington. You're a loony toony. You're toony loone. Not a bright one either. You're the one who's ranting. Somebody's got to do it. :) |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:46:11 -0400, Lil Abner wrote:
On 3/25/2011 11:54 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:42:29 -0400, Lil wrote: On 3/25/2011 9:35 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:36:14 -0400, Lil wrote: On 3/25/2011 7:14 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:57:06 -0400, Lil wrote: On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#% Drive what? The military, in this country anyway, answers to the political infrastructure. The Military hasn't been allowed to fulfill, it's implied mission, victory. Defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory, in Viet Nam thanks to Kerry, Fonda and Fifth Columnists efforts here. We have wasted lives and money in Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan, etc. We have no mission goal in Libya although we assume we want to win??? something. The goal should be American independent of what the UN or anyone else declares. If we are going to expend our Money and risk our Military then let's win. Let's go deliberately about getting rid of Qaddafi's forces right now. Let's not let alQuaeda or other hostiles take charge, of what we won. We on it lets make sure Libyans, friendly, to the US and dedicated to running Libya not exporting terror run the Country. to all the idiots that scream imperialism or other junk are not our friends and we really don't give a hoot what they say. It's about time US Leaders did a little succeeding. Let our Military do it's job. Ask the Professionals what they need and let them get the job done. It will be cheaper by far, in the long run, and we get something done. no more half assing in Washington. You're a loony toony. You're toony loone. Not a bright one either. You're the one who's ranting. Somebody's got to do it. :) Yes. A loony person. :) |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Mar 26, 2:18*am, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:46:11 -0400, Lil Abner wrote: On 3/25/2011 11:54 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:42:29 -0400, Lil *wrote: On 3/25/2011 9:35 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:36:14 -0400, Lil * wrote: On 3/25/2011 7:14 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:57:06 -0400, Lil * *wrote: On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. *This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. *while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving *the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#% Drive what? The military, in this country anyway, answers to the political infrastructure. The Military hasn't been allowed to fulfill, it's implied mission, victory. Defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory, in Viet Nam thanks to Kerry, Fonda and Fifth Columnists efforts here. We have wasted lives and money in Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan, etc. We have no mission goal in Libya although we assume we want to win??? something. The goal should be American independent of what the UN or anyone else declares. If we are going to expend our Money and risk our Military then let's win. Let's go deliberately about getting rid of Qaddafi's forces right now. Let's not let alQuaeda or other hostiles take charge, of what we won. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:17 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com