Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/25/2011 11:54 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:42:29 -0400, Lil wrote: On 3/25/2011 9:35 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:36:14 -0400, Lil wrote: On 3/25/2011 7:14 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:57:06 -0400, Lil wrote: On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#% Drive what? The military, in this country anyway, answers to the political infrastructure. The Military hasn't been allowed to fulfill, it's implied mission, victory. Defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory, in Viet Nam thanks to Kerry, Fonda and Fifth Columnists efforts here. We have wasted lives and money in Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan, etc. We have no mission goal in Libya although we assume we want to win??? something. The goal should be American independent of what the UN or anyone else declares. If we are going to expend our Money and risk our Military then let's win. Let's go deliberately about getting rid of Qaddafi's forces right now. Let's not let alQuaeda or other hostiles take charge, of what we won. We on it lets make sure Libyans, friendly, to the US and dedicated to running Libya not exporting terror run the Country. to all the idiots that scream imperialism or other junk are not our friends and we really don't give a hoot what they say. It's about time US Leaders did a little succeeding. Let our Military do it's job. Ask the Professionals what they need and let them get the job done. It will be cheaper by far, in the long run, and we get something done. no more half assing in Washington. You're a loony toony. You're toony loone. Not a bright one either. You're the one who's ranting. Somebody's got to do it. ![]() |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:46:11 -0400, Lil Abner wrote:
On 3/25/2011 11:54 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:42:29 -0400, Lil wrote: On 3/25/2011 9:35 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:36:14 -0400, Lil wrote: On 3/25/2011 7:14 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:57:06 -0400, Lil wrote: On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#% Drive what? The military, in this country anyway, answers to the political infrastructure. The Military hasn't been allowed to fulfill, it's implied mission, victory. Defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory, in Viet Nam thanks to Kerry, Fonda and Fifth Columnists efforts here. We have wasted lives and money in Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan, etc. We have no mission goal in Libya although we assume we want to win??? something. The goal should be American independent of what the UN or anyone else declares. If we are going to expend our Money and risk our Military then let's win. Let's go deliberately about getting rid of Qaddafi's forces right now. Let's not let alQuaeda or other hostiles take charge, of what we won. We on it lets make sure Libyans, friendly, to the US and dedicated to running Libya not exporting terror run the Country. to all the idiots that scream imperialism or other junk are not our friends and we really don't give a hoot what they say. It's about time US Leaders did a little succeeding. Let our Military do it's job. Ask the Professionals what they need and let them get the job done. It will be cheaper by far, in the long run, and we get something done. no more half assing in Washington. You're a loony toony. You're toony loone. Not a bright one either. You're the one who's ranting. Somebody's got to do it. ![]() Yes. A loony person. ![]() |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 26, 2:18*am, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:46:11 -0400, Lil Abner wrote: On 3/25/2011 11:54 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:42:29 -0400, Lil *wrote: On 3/25/2011 9:35 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:36:14 -0400, Lil * wrote: On 3/25/2011 7:14 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:57:06 -0400, Lil * *wrote: On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. *This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. *while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving *the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#% Drive what? The military, in this country anyway, answers to the political infrastructure. The Military hasn't been allowed to fulfill, it's implied mission, victory. Defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory, in Viet Nam thanks to Kerry, Fonda and Fifth Columnists efforts here. We have wasted lives and money in Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan, etc. We have no mission goal in Libya although we assume we want to win??? something. The goal should be American independent of what the UN or anyone else declares. If we are going to expend our Money and risk our Military then let's win. Let's go deliberately about getting rid of Qaddafi's forces right now. Let's not let alQuaeda or other hostiles take charge, of what we won. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NATO is concerned about smarter pirates | General | |||
Blue Cross Sticks It to Everyone...Still. | General | |||
Denmark and Nato.. | General | |||
Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties... | General | |||
It's your Uncle Sam calling... | General |