On 25/03/2011 1:12 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:34:02 -0600,
wrote:

On 25/03/2011 10:11 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 10:46 PM, TopBassDog wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp



NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To
Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat

Maybe it is because they trust the Muslim president. Follow this.

Egypt is going Muslim Brotherhood.
Libya rebels are al-Qaeda associates.
Ivory Coast UN man is Muslim/Colonial friendly.

Dozens of other nations like this in the US-UN-France mess. Read up on
Rwanda for the last time this happened, and locals know it is doom to
let it happen to them in the Ivory Coast.

Hey, Obama might have said he became a Christian at 27, but he acts like
a Muslim. Know that in Islam it is ok to deceive infidels.

And US is being economically destroyed with debt and unemployment.

Obama didn't see why building a mosque on the ash fall zone of 9/11 was
wrong.

Hopefully the US gets a better president in 2012. Or impeach this one
for war without cause and assassination attempts. Maybe Ashley Turton
knew too much? Or perhaps John Wheeler?

China, Russia and India are now allies, stating they are against
US-UN-France conquest and backing of terrorism. And it is known
US-UN-France operatives are in all these countries supporting terrorism,
rebelion, funding the UN man.

One thing is for sure, not all is as it seems.


Your post is so much bat**** bull****, it is hard to know where to begin.

1. Obama is not a muslim. Your constant harping on this is as
non-sensical as the similar idiotic comments made in 1961 when Kennedy
was running for president and your earlier day counterparts whined that
he was a catholic and therefore under the thumb of the pope. That was a
bull**** comment then, and yours are bull**** comments now.

2. We'd be far better off if presidential candidates were forbidden to
discuss their religious beliefs. Superstition is not a trait I find
admirable in a seeker of high political office.

3. The directions other countries take is a matter for the citizens of
those countries to make.

4. Your boy Bush, a christian fundamentalist, deceived everyone.

5. The "ash zone" of the aftermath of 9-11 went well beyond the
boundaries of Manhattan. Besides, it wasn't the muslim religion that
destroyed those buildings; it was bunch of fundamentalist nutcases.
Up to that point the worst such terrorist attack within the borders of
the United States was committed by McVeigh, a christian fundamentalist.
I'll bet you wouldn't object to a christian church being built within
the "ash zone" of the Oklahoma City bombing.

Obama was born a Muslim, get over it. Denial of reality must be
frustrating or is ignorance bliss?

I agree. Separation of church and state is good. No stable government
is possible without it.

Less deception from Bush than Obama.

The mosque was not more than a few blocks away. Maybe this will help
your feeble mind. I will even suggest it was intentional.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wo...e_location.jpg

Bush lied about a war of choice that caused the needless deaths of
tens of thousands of people.

I guess the strip club even closer to ground zero is ok with you,
because it represents your narrow view of the world. Of course,
there's also St. Nicholas Church also, not to mention another mosques
in the general area.

Please tell us how far away is acceptable for a community center.

Nope, he didn't lie. Congress, Dim and GOP both agreed too. Get over
it. Still hanging on to the idea it is all Bushes fault? Hey, why not
blame Abraham Lincoln or George Washington, or Thomas Jefferson? Or
maybe even Jesus Christ?

At least 2 miles. If the Muslims can't walk that far, well, get into
shape or turn in would be bombers.

On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:20:59 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 25/03/2011 2:25 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote:

On Mar 25, 11:59 am, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John
wrote:



On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us...

NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To
Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for
the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently
balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in
charge of the brunt of combat.

NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone
over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar
Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with
responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other
targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the
operation....

It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while
the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing
new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders
try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the
American cheque payer the bill.

You should really vote in different politicians.

I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario.

You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al
Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world.

Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after
Saudi Arabia.

I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired
them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that
means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all.

Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop.

How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah
and praise the country of which he's the president.

Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous
stupidity.

Ah yes, another bit of racist nonsense from a right-wing moron.

Despite your stupidity, you have the right to declare it as often as
you like.

You still haven't told us, is bringing up race an excuse or a reason?

You've already told us you're a racist. You don't have to keep telling
us.

On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:19:26 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 25/03/2011 1:43 PM, John H wrote:
On Mar 25, 11:59 am, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John
wrote:



On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us...

NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To
Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for
the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently
balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in
charge of the brunt of combat.

NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone
over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar
Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with
responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other
targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the
operation....

It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while
the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing
new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders
try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the
American cheque payer the bill.

You should really vote in different politicians.

I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario.

You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al
Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world.

Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after
Saudi Arabia.

I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired
them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that
means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all.

Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop.

How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah
and praise the country of which he's the president.

Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous
stupidity.

Scary part, the idiot might have is is going to breed. What a thought.

Perhaps you should let the "thought" get a bit more coherent before
you post it... in English not gibberish.

On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:29:25 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 25/03/2011 1:12 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:34:02 -0600,
wrote:

On 25/03/2011 10:11 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 10:46 PM, TopBassDog wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp



NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To
Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat

Maybe it is because they trust the Muslim president. Follow this.

Egypt is going Muslim Brotherhood.
Libya rebels are al-Qaeda associates.
Ivory Coast UN man is Muslim/Colonial friendly.

Dozens of other nations like this in the US-UN-France mess. Read up on
Rwanda for the last time this happened, and locals know it is doom to
let it happen to them in the Ivory Coast.

Hey, Obama might have said he became a Christian at 27, but he acts like
a Muslim. Know that in Islam it is ok to deceive infidels.

And US is being economically destroyed with debt and unemployment.

Obama didn't see why building a mosque on the ash fall zone of 9/11 was
wrong.

Hopefully the US gets a better president in 2012. Or impeach this one
for war without cause and assassination attempts. Maybe Ashley Turton
knew too much? Or perhaps John Wheeler?

China, Russia and India are now allies, stating they are against
US-UN-France conquest and backing of terrorism. And it is known
US-UN-France operatives are in all these countries supporting terrorism,
rebelion, funding the UN man.

One thing is for sure, not all is as it seems.


Your post is so much bat**** bull****, it is hard to know where to begin.

1. Obama is not a muslim. Your constant harping on this is as
non-sensical as the similar idiotic comments made in 1961 when Kennedy
was running for president and your earlier day counterparts whined that
he was a catholic and therefore under the thumb of the pope. That was a
bull**** comment then, and yours are bull**** comments now.

2. We'd be far better off if presidential candidates were forbidden to
discuss their religious beliefs. Superstition is not a trait I find
admirable in a seeker of high political office.

3. The directions other countries take is a matter for the citizens of
those countries to make.

4. Your boy Bush, a christian fundamentalist, deceived everyone.

5. The "ash zone" of the aftermath of 9-11 went well beyond the
boundaries of Manhattan. Besides, it wasn't the muslim religion that
destroyed those buildings; it was bunch of fundamentalist nutcases.
Up to that point the worst such terrorist attack within the borders of
the United States was committed by McVeigh, a christian fundamentalist.
I'll bet you wouldn't object to a christian church being built within
the "ash zone" of the Oklahoma City bombing.

Obama was born a Muslim, get over it. Denial of reality must be
frustrating or is ignorance bliss?

I agree. Separation of church and state is good. No stable government
is possible without it.

Less deception from Bush than Obama.

The mosque was not more than a few blocks away. Maybe this will help
your feeble mind. I will even suggest it was intentional.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wo...e_location.jpg

Bush lied about a war of choice that caused the needless deaths of
tens of thousands of people.

I guess the strip club even closer to ground zero is ok with you,
because it represents your narrow view of the world. Of course,
there's also St. Nicholas Church also, not to mention another mosques
in the general area.

Please tell us how far away is acceptable for a community center.

Nope, he didn't lie. Congress, Dim and GOP both agreed too. Get over
it. Still hanging on to the idea it is all Bushes fault? Hey, why not
blame Abraham Lincoln or George Washington, or Thomas Jefferson? Or
maybe even Jesus Christ?

At least 2 miles. If the Muslims can't walk that far, well, get into
shape or turn in would be bombers.

You're an idiot and a racist asshole.

On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:36:14 -0400, Lil Abner wrote:

On 3/25/2011 7:14 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:57:06 -0400, Lil wrote:

On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp

NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To
Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for
the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently
balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in
charge of the brunt of combat.

NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone
over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar
Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with
responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other
targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the
operation....

It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while
the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing
new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders
try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the
American cheque payer the bill.

You should really vote in different politicians.
If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and
White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#%

Drive what? The military, in this country anyway, answers to the
political infrastructure.
The Military hasn't been allowed to fulfill, it's implied mission, victory.
Defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory, in Viet Nam thanks to
Kerry, Fonda and Fifth Columnists efforts here.
We have wasted lives and money in Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan, etc.
We have no mission goal in Libya although we assume we want to win???
something.
The goal should be American independent of what the UN or anyone else
declares. If we are going to expend our Money and risk our Military then
let's win. Let's go deliberately about getting rid of Qaddafi's forces
right now.
Let's not let alQuaeda or other hostiles take charge, of what we won.
We on it lets make sure Libyans, friendly, to the US and dedicated to
running Libya not exporting terror run the Country. to all the idiots
that scream imperialism or other junk are not our friends and we really
don't give a hoot what they say.
It's about time US Leaders did a little succeeding. Let our Military do
it's job. Ask the Professionals what they need and let them get the job
done. It will be cheaper by far, in the long run, and we get something done.
no more half assing in Washington.

You're a loony toony.

On 3/25/2011 9:35 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:36:14 -0400, Lil wrote:

On 3/25/2011 7:14 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:57:06 -0400, Lil wrote:

On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp

NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To
Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for
the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently
balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in
charge of the brunt of combat.

NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone
over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar
Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with
responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other
targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the
operation....

It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while
the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing
new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders
try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the
American cheque payer the bill.

You should really vote in different politicians.
If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and
White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#%

Drive what? The military, in this country anyway, answers to the
political infrastructure.
The Military hasn't been allowed to fulfill, it's implied mission, victory.
Defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory, in Viet Nam thanks to
Kerry, Fonda and Fifth Columnists efforts here.
We have wasted lives and money in Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan, etc.
We have no mission goal in Libya although we assume we want to win???
something.
The goal should be American independent of what the UN or anyone else
declares. If we are going to expend our Money and risk our Military then
let's win. Let's go deliberately about getting rid of Qaddafi's forces
right now.
Let's not let alQuaeda or other hostiles take charge, of what we won.
We on it lets make sure Libyans, friendly, to the US and dedicated to
running Libya not exporting terror run the Country. to all the idiots
that scream imperialism or other junk are not our friends and we really
don't give a hoot what they say.
It's about time US Leaders did a little succeeding. Let our Military do
it's job. Ask the Professionals what they need and let them get the job
done. It will be cheaper by far, in the long run, and we get something done.
no more half assing in Washington.

You're a loony toony.
You're toony loone. Not a bright one either.

On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:42:29 -0400, Lil Abner wrote:

On 3/25/2011 9:35 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:36:14 -0400, Lil wrote:

On 3/25/2011 7:14 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:57:06 -0400, Lil wrote:

On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp

NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To
Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for
the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently
balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in
charge of the brunt of combat.

NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone
over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar
Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with
responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other
targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the
operation....

It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while
the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing
new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders
try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the
American cheque payer the bill.

You should really vote in different politicians.
If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and
White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#%

Drive what? The military, in this country anyway, answers to the
political infrastructure.
The Military hasn't been allowed to fulfill, it's implied mission, victory.
Defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory, in Viet Nam thanks to
Kerry, Fonda and Fifth Columnists efforts here.
We have wasted lives and money in Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan, etc.
We have no mission goal in Libya although we assume we want to win???
something.
The goal should be American independent of what the UN or anyone else
declares. If we are going to expend our Money and risk our Military then
let's win. Let's go deliberately about getting rid of Qaddafi's forces
right now.
Let's not let alQuaeda or other hostiles take charge, of what we won.
We on it lets make sure Libyans, friendly, to the US and dedicated to
running Libya not exporting terror run the Country. to all the idiots
that scream imperialism or other junk are not our friends and we really
don't give a hoot what they say.
It's about time US Leaders did a little succeeding. Let our Military do
it's job. Ask the Professionals what they need and let them get the job
done. It will be cheaper by far, in the long run, and we get something done.
no more half assing in Washington.

You're a loony toony.
You're toony loone. Not a bright one either.

You're the one who's ranting.

On 3/25/2011 11:54 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:42:29 -0400, Lil wrote:

On 3/25/2011 9:35 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:36:14 -0400, Lil wrote:

On 3/25/2011 7:14 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:57:06 -0400, Lil wrote:

On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp

NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To
Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for
the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently
balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in
charge of the brunt of combat.

NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone
over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar
Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with
responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other
targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the
operation....

It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while
the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing
new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders
try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the
American cheque payer the bill.

You should really vote in different politicians.
If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and
White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#%

Drive what? The military, in this country anyway, answers to the
political infrastructure.
The Military hasn't been allowed to fulfill, it's implied mission, victory.
Defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory, in Viet Nam thanks to
Kerry, Fonda and Fifth Columnists efforts here.
We have wasted lives and money in Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan, etc.
We have no mission goal in Libya although we assume we want to win???
something.
The goal should be American independent of what the UN or anyone else
declares. If we are going to expend our Money and risk our Military then
let's win. Let's go deliberately about getting rid of Qaddafi's forces
right now.
Let's not let alQuaeda or other hostiles take charge, of what we won.
We on it lets make sure Libyans, friendly, to the US and dedicated to
running Libya not exporting terror run the Country. to all the idiots
that scream imperialism or other junk are not our friends and we really
don't give a hoot what they say.
It's about time US Leaders did a little succeeding. Let our Military do
it's job. Ask the Professionals what they need and let them get the job
done. It will be cheaper by far, in the long run, and we get something done.
no more half assing in Washington.

You're a loony toony.
You're toony loone. Not a bright one either.

You're the one who's ranting.
Somebody's got to do it.

On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:46:11 -0400, Lil Abner wrote:

On 3/25/2011 11:54 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:42:29 -0400, Lil wrote:

On 3/25/2011 9:35 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:36:14 -0400, Lil wrote:

On 3/25/2011 7:14 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:57:06 -0400, Lil wrote:

On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp

NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To
Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for
the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently
balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in
charge of the brunt of combat.

NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone
over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar
Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with
responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other
targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the
operation....

It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while
the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing
new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders
try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the
American cheque payer the bill.

You should really vote in different politicians.
If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and
White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#%

Drive what? The military, in this country anyway, answers to the
political infrastructure.
The Military hasn't been allowed to fulfill, it's implied mission, victory.
Defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory, in Viet Nam thanks to
Kerry, Fonda and Fifth Columnists efforts here.
We have wasted lives and money in Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan, etc.
We have no mission goal in Libya although we assume we want to win???
something.
The goal should be American independent of what the UN or anyone else
declares. If we are going to expend our Money and risk our Military then
let's win. Let's go deliberately about getting rid of Qaddafi's forces
right now.
Let's not let alQuaeda or other hostiles take charge, of what we won.
We on it lets make sure Libyans, friendly, to the US and dedicated to
running Libya not exporting terror run the Country. to all the idiots
that scream imperialism or other junk are not our friends and we really
don't give a hoot what they say.
It's about time US Leaders did a little succeeding. Let our Military do
it's job. Ask the Professionals what they need and let them get the job
done. It will be cheaper by far, in the long run, and we get something done.
no more half assing in Washington.

You're a loony toony.
You're toony loone. Not a bright one either.

You're the one who's ranting.
Somebody's got to do it.

Yes. A loony person.

On Mar 26, 2:18*am, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:46:11 -0400, Lil Abner wrote:
On 3/25/2011 11:54 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:42:29 -0400, Lil *wrote:

On 3/25/2011 9:35 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:36:14 -0400, Lil * wrote:

On 3/25/2011 7:14 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:57:06 -0400, Lil * *wrote:

On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us...

NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To
Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for
the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently
balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in
charge of the brunt of combat.

NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone
over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar
Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with
responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other
targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the
operation....

It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while
the United Nations shares the glory within itself. *This is nothing
new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. *while it's leaders
try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving *the
American cheque payer the bill.

You should really vote in different politicians.
If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and
White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#%

Drive what? The military, in this country anyway, answers to the
political infrastructure.
The Military hasn't been allowed to fulfill, it's implied mission, victory.
Defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory, in Viet Nam thanks to
Kerry, Fonda and Fifth Columnists efforts here.
We have wasted lives and money in Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan, etc.
We have no mission goal in Libya although we assume we want to win???
something.
The goal should be American independent of what the UN or anyone else
declares. If we are going to expend our Money and risk our Military then
let's win. Let's go deliberately about getting rid of Qaddafi's forces
right now.
Let's not let alQuaeda or other hostiles take charge, of what we won.