|
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
"Gene" wrote in message ... On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. That's paranoid, but would be a wise course, for them.... Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. Since nearly all of the 911 attackers were from Saudi Arabia.... been there done that..... Bottom Line? give people a taste of freedom and self determination and things will take their own course. The Libyans (unlike the Iraqis) are the best current example of folks willing to fight and die for that cause. Morally, we owe them a bit of help..... and should NOT turn our backs on them the way we did the Poles in WWII..... To place this in historical perspective... we should be eternally grateful to the French for providing damn near every grain of powder fired by US during the American Revolution..... otherwise you'd be speaking British, today.... ************* Speaking British might be a vast improvement over what comes out of the mouths of Kevin, Scotty and some of the other dopers in this newsgroup. ;-) |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:57:12 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46*pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. *This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. *while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving *the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. That's paranoid, but would be a wise course, for them.... Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. Since nearly all of the 911 attackers were from Saudi Arabia.... been there done that..... Bottom Line? give people a taste of freedom and self determination and things will take their own course. The Libyans (unlike the Iraqis) are the best current example of folks willing to fight and die for that cause. Morally, we owe them a bit of help..... and should NOT turn our backs on them the way we did the Poles in WWII..... To place this in historical perspective... we should be eternally grateful to the French for providing damn near every grain of powder fired by US during the American Revolution..... otherwise you'd be speaking British, today.... Well, my gosh. It's nice to know you have such a great warmth for all those rebels everywhere. I sure as hell hope you're right and they're all 'good guys'! |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#% |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:57:06 -0400, Lil Abner wrote:
On 3/25/2011 12:46 AM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...?ref=fb&src=sp NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. If our Military handled it fine. if Washington State Department and White House try to drive $#@%!@#$#% Drive what? The military, in this country anyway, answers to the political infrastructure. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:00:37 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:25:39 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:57:12 -0400, Gene wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46*pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. *This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. *while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving *the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. That's paranoid, but would be a wise course, for them.... Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. Since nearly all of the 911 attackers were from Saudi Arabia.... been there done that..... Bottom Line? give people a taste of freedom and self determination and things will take their own course. The Libyans (unlike the Iraqis) are the best current example of folks willing to fight and die for that cause. Morally, we owe them a bit of help..... and should NOT turn our backs on them the way we did the Poles in WWII..... To place this in historical perspective... we should be eternally grateful to the French for providing damn near every grain of powder fired by US during the American Revolution..... otherwise you'd be speaking British, today.... Well, my gosh. It's nice to know you have such a great warmth for all those rebels everywhere. I sure as hell hope you're right and they're all 'good guys'! I am, also, not Pollyanna... I hope so, too.... sometimes you just have to give it your best shot and hope your best guess won't come back and slap you silly.... I guess erring on the positive side is better than doing nothing.... however, the "fool me once" caveat kicks in and we don't get silly twice.... If Afghanistan is once...and it is, then Libya is twice. Even Gen Ham can't answer the questions he's given. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 3/25/2011 11:59 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all. Dear, you are talking gibberish. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 25/03/2011 1:43 PM, John H wrote:
On Mar 25, 11:59 am, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all. Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop. How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah and praise the country of which he's the president. Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous stupidity. Scary part, the idiot might have is is going to breed. What a thought. |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 25/03/2011 2:25 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT), John H wrote: On Mar 25, 11:59 am, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all. Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop. How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah and praise the country of which he's the president. Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous stupidity. Ah yes, another bit of racist nonsense from a right-wing moron. Despite your stupidity, you have the right to declare it as often as you like. You still haven't told us, is bringing up race an excuse or a reason? |
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 25/03/2011 3:57 PM, Gene wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. That's paranoid, but would be a wise course, for them.... Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. Since nearly all of the 911 attackers were from Saudi Arabia.... been there done that..... Bottom Line? give people a taste of freedom and self determination and things will take their own course. The Libyans (unlike the Iraqis) are the best current example of folks willing to fight and die for that cause. Morally, we owe them a bit of help..... and should NOT turn our backs on them the way we did the Poles in WWII..... To place this in historical perspective... we should be eternally grateful to the French for providing damn near every grain of powder fired by US during the American Revolution..... otherwise you'd be speaking British, today.... You might want not to get too cozy with the French. The French resistance was worried more about their own people than the Nazi as many looked for reasons to get favors out them, by turning in their own. Lots of German genes in Paris today because of that. But Obama supporting al-Qaedea affiliates? That does cross the line. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com