In article ,
says...

On 22/03/2011 4:53 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
The price for my support for Obama?s war is the admission by liberals
that Bush was right. Otherwise, we are logically forced to conclude
that liberal policies involving deaths of US servicemen is driven
purely by US politics. If they will admit that Bush was right, it
will be evidence that they can learn from their mistakes and I will
then be able to support the war. Until then, I will use Liberals own
rhetoric against them.

Yep. It is in fact. Obama be a war monger too. So suck it up dim-wit
fleabaggers, Obama just said Bush was right so tow THE Obama line now ya
all hear.....

Didn't big mouth THE Obama "In Debt We Trust!" also say he was going to
end the war? Oh well, just another liar politician with no brains, just
lies.

It's over... Obama has checked out on the world. He is just on vacation
and it's gone too far, I don't think he can save it now... Good.

On 23/03/2011 3:08 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On 22/03/2011 4:53 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
The price for my support for Obama?s war is the admission by liberals
that Bush was right. Otherwise, we are logically forced to conclude
that liberal policies involving deaths of US servicemen is driven
purely by US politics. If they will admit that Bush was right, it
will be evidence that they can learn from their mistakes and I will
then be able to support the war. Until then, I will use Liberals own
rhetoric against them.

Yep. It is in fact. Obama be a war monger too. So suck it up dim-wit
fleabaggers, Obama just said Bush was right so tow THE Obama line now ya
all hear.....

Didn't big mouth THE Obama "In Debt We Trust!" also say he was going to
end the war? Oh well, just another liar politician with no brains, just
lies.

It's over... Obama has checked out on the world. He is just on vacation
and it's gone too far, I don't think he can save it now... Good.

I had no doubt. To save the US now starts with "Well boys, we have to
roll up our sleeves and we have a very long road ahead of us...."

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:53:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

The price for my support for Obama’s war is the admission by liberals
that Bush was right.

let's see. number of dead soliders in libya

zero

number of soldiers killed by bush

4400

gee. why dont i find your view convincing?



Otherwise, we are logically forced to conclude
that liberal policies involving deaths of US servicemen is driven
purely by US politics. If they will admit that Bush was right, it
will be evidence that they can learn from their mistakes and I will
then be able to support the war. Until then, I will use Liberals own
rhetoric against them.

bush got us into a trillion dollar war. he's a lunatic

On Mar 22, 8:20*pm, Gene wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:53:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
The price for my support for Obama s war is the admission by liberals
that Bush was right. *Otherwise, we are logically forced to conclude
that liberal policies involving deaths of US servicemen is driven
purely by US politics. *If they will admit that Bush was right, it
will be evidence that they can learn from their mistakes and I will
then be able to support the war. *Until then, I will use Liberals own
rhetoric against them.

Afghanistan: Bush was right.

Iraq: Bush was a 100% gold plated ball bearing idiot.

--

Fort Agent 6.00 Build 1186

"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by
the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do.
So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor.
Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover." * - Unknown

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
*http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm

Unless you agree that Bush was right in Iraq then logically you cannot
support Obama's war in Libya. However, one should never try to
confuse a liberal with logic. Let's try slogans.
NO WAR FOR OIL
I support the troops, I do not support the war. Bring them home.
Yes, pilots are troops.
How many civilians have to die for Obama's lust for oil?
We should all urge 18 year old kids NOT to sign up for the military
because otherwise they will have to fight in Obama's Oil War.

In article 80081ca9-837d-41e6-bbbd-2597befae4c4
@s9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says...

On Mar 22, 8:20*pm, Gene wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:53:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
The price for my support for Obama s war is the admission by liberals
that Bush was right. *Otherwise, we are logically forced to conclude
that liberal policies involving deaths of US servicemen is driven
purely by US politics. *If they will admit that Bush was right, it
will be evidence that they can learn from their mistakes and I will
then be able to support the war. *Until then, I will use Liberals own
rhetoric against them.

Afghanistan: Bush was right.

Iraq: Bush was a 100% gold plated ball bearing idiot.

--

Fort Agent 6.00 Build 1186

"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by
the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do.
So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor.
Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover." * - Unknown

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
*http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm

Unless you agree that Bush was right in Iraq then logically you cannot
support Obama's war in Libya. However, one should never try to
confuse a liberal with logic. Let's try slogans.
NO WAR FOR OIL
I support the troops, I do not support the war. Bring them home.
Yes, pilots are troops.
How many civilians have to die for Obama's lust for oil?
We should all urge 18 year old kids NOT to sign up for the military
because otherwise they will have to fight in Obama's Oil War.

No, no, no... it's different now...

In article 80081ca9-837d-41e6-bbbd-2597befae4c4
@s9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says...

On Mar 22, 8:20*pm, Gene wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:53:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
The price for my support for Obama s war is the admission by liberals
that Bush was right. *Otherwise, we are logically forced to conclude
that liberal policies involving deaths of US servicemen is driven
purely by US politics. *If they will admit that Bush was right, it
will be evidence that they can learn from their mistakes and I will
then be able to support the war. *Until then, I will use Liberals own
rhetoric against them.

Afghanistan: Bush was right.

Iraq: Bush was a 100% gold plated ball bearing idiot.

--

Fort Agent 6.00 Build 1186

"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by
the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do.
So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor.
Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover." * - Unknown

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
*http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm

Unless you agree that Bush was right in Iraq then logically you cannot
support Obama's war in Libya. However, one should never try to
confuse a liberal with logic. Let's try slogans.
NO WAR FOR OIL
I support the troops, I do not support the war. Bring them home.
Yes, pilots are troops.
How many civilians have to die for Obama's lust for oil?
We should all urge 18 year old kids NOT to sign up for the military
because otherwise they will have to fight in Obama's Oil War.

This is way to honest and logical for those on the left...

I_am_Tosk wrote:
In article80081ca9-837d-41e6-bbbd-2597befae4c4
@s9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says...
On Mar 22, 8:20 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:53:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
The price for my support for Obama s war is the admission by liberals
that Bush was right. Otherwise, we are logically forced to conclude
that liberal policies involving deaths of US servicemen is driven
purely by US politics. If they will admit that Bush was right, it
will be evidence that they can learn from their mistakes and I will
then be able to support the war. Until then, I will use Liberals own
rhetoric against them.
Afghanistan: Bush was right.

Iraq: Bush was a 100% gold plated ball bearing idiot.

--

Fort Agent 6.00 Build 1186

"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by
the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do.
So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor.
Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover." - Unknown

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm
Unless you agree that Bush was right in Iraq then logically you cannot
support Obama's war in Libya. However, one should never try to
confuse a liberal with logic. Let's try slogans.
NO WAR FOR OIL
I support the troops, I do not support the war. Bring them home.
Yes, pilots are troops.
How many civilians have to die for Obama's lust for oil?
We should all urge 18 year old kids NOT to sign up for the military
because otherwise they will have to fight in Obama's Oil War.

This is way to honest and logical for those on the left...


Frogwatch, Canuck and Snotty Ingersoll - uninformed, ignorant, and full
of hate.

On 23/03/2011 4:41 AM, Harryk wrote:
I_am_Tosk wrote:
In article80081ca9-837d-41e6-bbbd-2597befae4c4
@s9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says...
On Mar 22, 8:20 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:53:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
The price for my support for Obama s war is the admission by liberals
that Bush was right. Otherwise, we are logically forced to conclude
that liberal policies involving deaths of US servicemen is driven
purely by US politics. If they will admit that Bush was right, it
will be evidence that they can learn from their mistakes and I will
then be able to support the war. Until then, I will use Liberals own
rhetoric against them.
Afghanistan: Bush was right.

Iraq: Bush was a 100% gold plated ball bearing idiot.

--

Fort Agent 6.00 Build 1186

"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by
the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do.
So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor.
Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover." - Unknown

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm
Unless you agree that Bush was right in Iraq then logically you cannot
support Obama's war in Libya. However, one should never try to
confuse a liberal with logic. Let's try slogans.
NO WAR FOR OIL
I support the troops, I do not support the war. Bring them home.
Yes, pilots are troops.
How many civilians have to die for Obama's lust for oil?
We should all urge 18 year old kids NOT to sign up for the military
because otherwise they will have to fight in Obama's Oil War.

This is way to honest and logical for those on the left...


Frogwatch, Canuck and Snotty Ingersoll - uninformed, ignorant, and full
of hate.

Sure beats being a fleabagger loaded with greed, envy, carelessness,
slander, lack of moral judgement.... you know fleabaggers.

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:24:39 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:


Unless you agree that Bush was right in Iraq then logically you cannot
support Obama's war in Libya.

remind me...how many UN mandates did bush have for iraq?

oh. none.


However, one should never try to
confuse a liberal with logic. Let's try slogans.
NO WAR FOR OIL

number of troops in libya?

zero

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:08:36 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:18:56 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:24:39 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:


Unless you agree that Bush was right in Iraq then logically you cannot
support Obama's war in Libya.

remind me...how many UN mandates did bush have for iraq?

oh. none.

There were several UN resolutions about Iraq.
At least he got approval from the US congress. Obama didn't for Libya.

didnt need to. he's not the first pres to fire missles at libya w/o
congresss approval