![]() |
Support for Obama's war
|
Support for Obama's war
|
Support for Obama's war
Canuck57 wrote:
On 22/03/2011 5:13 PM, Harryk wrote: Frogwatch wrote: The price for my support for Obama’s war is the admission by liberals that Bush was right. No one gives a flying f*ck about your support for Obama. I think, except for fleabaggers; we have open contempt for Obama, not support and certainy no respect either. The man is only good at standing on a soap box, all talk and no walk. No one cares what you think, either, teahadist. |
Support for Obama's war
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:13:12 -0400, Harryk
wrote: Frogwatch wrote: The price for my support for Obama’s war is the admission by liberals that Bush was right. No one gives a flying f*ck about your support for Obama. He wouldn't support Obama if he were gold plated. Nobody give's a damn about his opinion other than his nutty friends. |
Support for Obama's war
|
Support for Obama's war
|
Support for Obama's war
|
Support for Obama's war
On 3/22/2011 7:45 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
The man is only good at standing on a soap box, all talk and no walk. Only if the soap box is accompanied by teleprompters. |
Support for Obama's war
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:20:00 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:53:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: The price for my support for Obama’s war is the admission by liberals that Bush was right. Otherwise, we are logically forced to conclude that liberal policies involving deaths of US servicemen is driven purely by US politics. If they will admit that Bush was right, it will be evidence that they can learn from their mistakes and I will then be able to support the war. Until then, I will use Liberals own rhetoric against them. Afghanistan: Bush was right. Iraq: Bush was a 100% gold plated ball bearing idiot. As is *your* boy in Libya. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com