On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:32:09 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 8:37 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 19:00:36 -0600,
wrote:


bush spent a TRILLION and killed 4400 US troops and you ignore THAT

oh...obama's black...

Obama be marching to a different drummer. After all, UN, Saudi and
France ... funny the colonial mess France is leaving. Look up Ivory
Coast and Guania.

Latest has the US placing a carrier off the coast of Behrain. But here
is the kicker. While civilians get shot in Behrain, the carrier is
there to prevent Iran from getting involved. Making new enemys for sure.


uh no. the carrier's port is IN BAHRAIN!!

Well, like I said, US taxpayers get the costs of protecting Saudi Arabia.

yep. time to bring 'em home. let the arabs pay for their own
corruption

"Gene" wrote in message ...

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 17:40:30 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Bush had congressional authorization for Iraq whereas Obama only has
it from the UN. Of course Obama sides with the UN that put Sudan and
Libya on the Human Rights council.

Oh, if Bush only had this much common sense....

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...-strategy.html

Following the "coalition of the willing" (not "leading" them while
they kicked and screamed... and quit.....)
No American troops on the ground...
Enforcement of the no-fly zone only by other nations...





--

Forté Agent 6.00 Build 1186

"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by
the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do.
So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor.
Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover." - Unknown

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm



Reply:

Gene, you get stupider and more partisan as time goes on. We have no ground
troops there, but we did not have any for 10 years of a no fly zone in Iraq.
We had UN approval for Iraq. Not much difference here than Iraq. We should
not have been in Bosnia, that was a European zone and European problem. We
should not have attacked Iraq. Maybe a Delta Force hit team, but we are
aggressors in Libya. They have not attacked us since Lockerby, and that was
a long time ago. Why are we not supporting Bahrain and Yeman? Why not
putting down genocide in the Sudan? We are broke, why spend a few billion
killing people in libya, when we do not even know if it is a majority
populist uprising? What are you going to say when a few thousand right or
left wing militants use arms against the government and China starts lobbing
in cruise missiles in support? same scenario.

In article ,
says...

"Gene" wrote in message ...

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 17:40:30 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Bush had congressional authorization for Iraq whereas Obama only has
it from the UN. Of course Obama sides with the UN that put Sudan and
Libya on the Human Rights council.

Oh, if Bush only had this much common sense....

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...-strategy.html

Following the "coalition of the willing" (not "leading" them while
they kicked and screamed... and quit.....)
No American troops on the ground...
Enforcement of the no-fly zone only by other nations...

You mean, kind of the way it was for years and years before we went into
Iraq? And Dude, if you believe it's an "enforcement of the no-fly zone
only by other nations", you are just gullible... We are the ones with
planes there, 120 missiles, and a lot of other assets too.. Oh, and you
can bet we have "observers" (special forces), helping (calling in air
strikes) from within theater, another words, "boots on the ground"...
Don't let MSNBC and CNN fool you...

On 21/03/2011 4:00 PM, Califbill wrote:
"Gene" wrote in message ...

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 17:40:30 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Bush had congressional authorization for Iraq whereas Obama only has
it from the UN. Of course Obama sides with the UN that put Sudan and
Libya on the Human Rights council.

Oh, if Bush only had this much common sense....

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...-strategy.html


Following the "coalition of the willing" (not "leading" them while
they kicked and screamed... and quit.....)
No American troops on the ground...
Enforcement of the no-fly zone only by other nations...

Obama is a Muslim. Being a Muslim is like being an American citizen in
that you can't just walk away from being a Muslim.

Killing Muslim buddies might not be Obama's cut of tea. Not very Islam
like. Ditto Somalia Muslim pirates holding American citizens.

Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 8:32 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
"... honest types like McCain/Palin."

You really are bat**** crazy.

Hey, do you think elections are about the people?

Almost everyone you have ever vote for comes with strings attached. big
back room money buys elections. Get the right backers, gehto to
president in 10 years. Or smeer, smeer, smeer.

I say smeer as I have no doubt people were out to smeer Pailin, take the
daughter with a baby out of wedlock. But no mention Obama was a
pregnency marriage as he was conceve out of wedlock.

Media is managed. Pick a story like the middle easy and dig for the
differing views on the internet. Then compare it to what you see on TV.
Many facts are often omitted with deliberation on selling the current
politicial view. Most TV stations lost their objectivity years ago.


Strings like, in the case of McCain, the onset of senility, or, in the
case of Palin, full-blown stupidity?

Palin got a lot of heat, not because her daughter had a child out of
wedlock, but because of what she did while a candidate and what she
said. It became apparent shortly after her nomination that she was an
uncurious airhead. She still is.
Yet you are still obsessed with her.

On 21/03/2011 5:57 PM, L G wrote:
Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 8:32 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
"... honest types like McCain/Palin."

You really are bat**** crazy.

Hey, do you think elections are about the people?

Almost everyone you have ever vote for comes with strings attached. big
back room money buys elections. Get the right backers, gehto to
president in 10 years. Or smeer, smeer, smeer.

I say smeer as I have no doubt people were out to smeer Pailin, take the
daughter with a baby out of wedlock. But no mention Obama was a
pregnency marriage as he was conceve out of wedlock.

Media is managed. Pick a story like the middle easy and dig for the
differing views on the internet. Then compare it to what you see on TV.
Many facts are often omitted with deliberation on selling the current
politicial view. Most TV stations lost their objectivity years ago.


Strings like, in the case of McCain, the onset of senility, or, in the
case of Palin, full-blown stupidity?

Palin got a lot of heat, not because her daughter had a child out of
wedlock, but because of what she did while a candidate and what she
said. It became apparent shortly after her nomination that she was an
uncurious airhead. She still is.
Yet you are still obsessed with her.

Maybe he lusts for her?

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:50:10 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 21/03/2011 4:00 PM, Califbill wrote:
"Gene" wrote in message ...

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 17:40:30 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Bush had congressional authorization for Iraq whereas Obama only has
it from the UN. Of course Obama sides with the UN that put Sudan and
Libya on the Human Rights council.

Oh, if Bush only had this much common sense....

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...-strategy.html


Following the "coalition of the willing" (not "leading" them while
they kicked and screamed... and quit.....)
No American troops on the ground...
Enforcement of the no-fly zone only by other nations...

Obama is a Muslim. Being a Muslim is like being an American citizen in
that you can't just walk away from being a Muslim.

oh brother.why are you SUCH a racist?? hell, i should call the RCMP
and accuse you of racial slander. that's a CRIME in canada


Killing Muslim buddies might not be Obama's cut of tea. Not very Islam
like. Ditto Somalia Muslim pirates holding American citizens.

so proof he's a muslim is that

he's killing muslims

uh...yeah that sounds like your type of logic

On 22/03/2011 4:51 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:50:10 -0600,
wrote:

On 21/03/2011 4:00 PM, Califbill wrote:
"Gene" wrote in message ...

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 17:40:30 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Bush had congressional authorization for Iraq whereas Obama only has
it from the UN. Of course Obama sides with the UN that put Sudan and
Libya on the Human Rights council.

Oh, if Bush only had this much common sense....

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...-strategy.html


Following the "coalition of the willing" (not "leading" them while
they kicked and screamed... and quit.....)
No American troops on the ground...
Enforcement of the no-fly zone only by other nations...

Obama is a Muslim. Being a Muslim is like being an American citizen in
that you can't just walk away from being a Muslim.

oh brother.why are you SUCH a racist?? hell, i should call the RCMP
and accuse you of racial slander. that's a CRIME in canada


Killing Muslim buddies might not be Obama's cut of tea. Not very Islam
like. Ditto Somalia Muslim pirates holding American citizens.

so proof he's a muslim is that

he's killing muslims

uh...yeah that sounds like your type of logic

His Saudi masters have spoken.

Canuck57 wrote:
On 21/03/2011 5:57 PM, L G wrote:
Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 8:32 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
"... honest types like McCain/Palin."

You really are bat**** crazy.

Hey, do you think elections are about the people?

Almost everyone you have ever vote for comes with strings attached.
big
back room money buys elections. Get the right backers, gehto to
president in 10 years. Or smeer, smeer, smeer.

I say smeer as I have no doubt people were out to smeer Pailin,
take the
daughter with a baby out of wedlock. But no mention Obama was a
pregnency marriage as he was conceve out of wedlock.

Media is managed. Pick a story like the middle easy and dig for the
differing views on the internet. Then compare it to what you see on
TV.
Many facts are often omitted with deliberation on selling the current
politicial view. Most TV stations lost their objectivity years ago.


Strings like, in the case of McCain, the onset of senility, or, in the
case of Palin, full-blown stupidity?

Palin got a lot of heat, not because her daughter had a child out of
wedlock, but because of what she did while a candidate and what she
said. It became apparent shortly after her nomination that she was an
uncurious airhead. She still is.
Yet you are still obsessed with her.

Maybe he lusts for her?
Endlessly...

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:21:21 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 22/03/2011 4:51 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:50:10 -0600,
wrote:
oh brother.why are you SUCH a racist?? hell, i should call the RCMP
and accuse you of racial slander. that's a CRIME in canada


Killing Muslim buddies might not be Obama's cut of tea. Not very Islam
like. Ditto Somalia Muslim pirates holding American citizens.

so proof he's a muslim is that

he's killing muslims

uh...yeah that sounds like your type of logic

His Saudi masters have spoken.

funny the very first thing BUSH did after 9/11 was to have the US
section of the bin laden family given a safe flight out of the US

but, of course, bush was white...