Hypocrisy
 

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

Hypocrisy
 

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

That's the question being asked in the "Please tell me what Gaddafi is..."
thread. But, you're welcome to ask it again. Maybe you'll get something other
than bull**** deflections.

Hypocrisy
 

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

You are an ideological idiot or a deliberate liar.

Bush was the one who lifted the sanctions on Gaddafi.

"We" are not attacking him. We're mostly running awacs in support of
NATO forces. Obama specifically said "no ground troops."

You're really disgusting.

Hypocrisy
 

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:39:46 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

That's the question being asked in the "Please tell me what Gaddafi is..."
thread. But, you're welcome to ask it again. Maybe you'll get something other
than bull**** deflections.

Or you and Frog will continue lying..

Hypocrisy
 

In article f17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374
@z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says...

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida
crackers or Virginia ex-military.
The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our
patriots serving in the armed forces.
So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people
be.
After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as
governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything.

Hypocrisy
 

On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people.

Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do not
explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business with him.
Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history.

Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and Obama to
stuff it. So this is their revenge. These power hungry mogals....
Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not
looking for more expensive wars.

Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's shooting
of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed minority in
Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is.

Hypocrisy
 

On Mar 19, 1:39*pm, John H wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. *So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? *With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. *Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they *are mindless
ninnies.

That's the question being asked in the "Please tell me what Gaddafi is..."
thread. But, you're welcome to ask it again. Maybe you'll get something other
than bull**** deflections.

Have you written that letter to the man who pays your living yet? You
know, to complain about the " ****ty " job he's doing?
Only a ****ing idiot like you, Herring, could shoot himself in the
foot.

Hypocrisy
 

On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374
@z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says...

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida
crackers or Virginia ex-military.
The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our
patriots serving in the armed forces.
So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people
be.
After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as
governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything.

Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil
war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different.

Hypocrisy
 

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:51:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374
@z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says...

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida
crackers or Virginia ex-military.
The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our
patriots serving in the armed forces.
So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people
be.
After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as
governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything.

Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil
war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different.

Too bad you don't know anything about history.

Hypocrisy
 

In article ,
says...

In article f17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374
@z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says...

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida
crackers or Virginia ex-military.
The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our
patriots serving in the armed forces.
So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people
be.
After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as
governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything.

Apparently you can't answer the question either.. It is a tough one for
a liberal...

Hypocrisy
 

On 19/03/2011 12:53 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:51:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374
@z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says...

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida
crackers or Virginia ex-military.
The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our
patriots serving in the armed forces.
So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people
be.
After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as
governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything.

Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil
war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different.

Too bad you don't know anything about history.

So fleabagger when are you buying your jack boots? I will say,
politiicans do like good little sheeples like you. Lead by the nose types.

Hypocrisy
 

In article ,
says...

On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people.

Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do not
explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business with him.
Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history.

Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and Obama to
stuff it. So this is their revenge. These power hungry mogals....
Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not
looking for more expensive wars.

Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's shooting
of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed minority in
Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is.

Gaddafi probably called Obama a name. He is a thin skinned dude for
sure...

Hypocrisy
 

On Mar 19, 2:59*pm, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...





On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. *So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? *With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. *Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they *are mindless
ninnies.

Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people.

Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do not
explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business with him.
* Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history.

Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and Obama to
stuff it. *So this is their revenge. *These power hungry mogals....
Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not
looking for more expensive wars.

Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's shooting
of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed minority in
Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is.

Gaddafi probably called Obama a name. He is a thin skinned dude for
sure...

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Now I see the difference. Obama is president now and
Bush was president then.

Hypocrisy
 

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article f17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374
@z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says...

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida
crackers or Virginia ex-military.
The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our
patriots serving in the armed forces.
So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people
be.
After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as
governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything.

Apparently you can't answer the question either.. It is a tough one for
a liberal...

You're the pussy lib. You got a problem going after Gaddafi?
Justify it.
Or just throw in with the traitor O'hara.
Same goes for you what I said about about the hick O'hara.
Your cracker pal Herring only served because they drafted his ass then
he became a lifer because he was afraid of life outside the barracks.
Now he bites the hand that feeds him. He's not needed.
You never served your country in the military or elsewhere.
You just sucked up unemployment, welfare, and food stamps.
Typical lib conduct.
So who gives a **** what you, Herring or O'hara think?
There's decent patriotic Americans here who support our troops.
We don't need traitorous **** from the likes of you.
Now go **** up one of your little motor bikes.
Leave the fighting to the French. You're not needed.
And take off that American flag pin. It don't work on you.

Hypocrisy
 

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:58:38 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:53 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:51:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374
@z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says...

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida
crackers or Virginia ex-military.
The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our
patriots serving in the armed forces.
So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people
be.
After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as
governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything.

Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil
war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different.

Too bad you don't know anything about history.

So fleabagger when are you buying your jack boots? I will say,
politiicans do like good little sheeples like you. Lead by the nose types.

You've already got them in your closet, along with your SS uniform.

Hypocrisy
 

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Mar 19, 2:59*pm, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...





On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. *So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? *With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. *Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they *are mindless
ninnies.

Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people.

Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do not
explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business with him.
* Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history.

Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and Obama to
stuff it. *So this is their revenge. *These power hungry mogals....
Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not
looking for more expensive wars.

Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's shooting
of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed minority in
Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is.

Gaddafi probably called Obama a name. He is a thin skinned dude for
sure...

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Now I see the difference. Obama is president now and
Bush was president then.

Yes, Obama is president. Get over it.

Hypocrisy
 

On 19/03/2011 2:20 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:58:38 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:53 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:51:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374
@z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says...

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida
crackers or Virginia ex-military.
The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our
patriots serving in the armed forces.
So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people
be.
After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as
governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything.

Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil
war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different.

Too bad you don't know anything about history.

So fleabagger when are you buying your jack boots? I will say,
politiicans do like good little sheeples like you. Lead by the nose types.

You've already got them in your closet, along with your SS uniform.

You would follow Obama to hell.

Last I check acts of war required congressional approval. Well Obama
does not think so, he just launched cruise missles into Libya. Yet
ignores unarmed non-violent protesters getting shot to death in Yemen
and Behrain....

Hypocritical president of yours needs an impeachment.

Hypocrisy
 

On 19/03/2011 12:59 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people.

Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do not
explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business with him.
Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history.

Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and Obama to
stuff it. So this is their revenge. These power hungry mogals....
Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not
looking for more expensive wars.

Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's shooting
of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed minority in
Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is.

Gaddafi probably called Obama a name. He is a thin skinned dude for
sure...

Funny how Obama will not go into Behrain where unarmed peaceful
civilians are getting shot at a higher rate than Libya, yet just
launched cruise missles into Libya without congressional approveal.

Far too much power for one man to have and I don't care if it is Dimwit
Democrates or GOP....

I can only see a president in acts of war without approval if the US is
being actively atacked, that didn't happen.

Another sad day for democracy as Obama is going to get away with it.

Hypocrisy
 

On 19/03/2011 1:27 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Mar 19, 2:59 pm, wrote:
In ,
says...





On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people.

Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do not
explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business with him.
Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history.

Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and Obama to
stuff it. So this is their revenge. These power hungry mogals....
Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not
looking for more expensive wars.

Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's shooting
of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed minority in
Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is.

Gaddafi probably called Obama a name. He is a thin skinned dude for
sure...

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Now I see the difference. Obama is president now and
Bush was president then.

At least Bush asked Congress about war....

Obama the Great tyrant war monger didn't think that was necessary with
Libya.

And ignores the civiians getting shot in Behrain -- but Saudis call the
shots in DC war machine these days. Pretty obvious Obama be a puppet
president.

Hey, USA economy in the tank, a debt spiral like never before, Egypt in
turmoil, Tunisa neutered, Yemen.... even french Guiana in going in for a
round of civic unreast just like UN-France messed up Ivory Coast. Are
we really into a WWW III scenario of subversion of foreign governments?

Hypocrisy
 

On 19/03/2011 2:21 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Mar 19, 2:59 pm, wrote:
In ,
says...





On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people.

Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do not
explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business with him.
Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history.

Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and Obama to
stuff it. So this is their revenge. These power hungry mogals....
Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not
looking for more expensive wars.

Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's shooting
of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed minority in
Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is.

Gaddafi probably called Obama a name. He is a thin skinned dude for
sure...

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Now I see the difference. Obama is president now and
Bush was president then.

Yes, Obama is president. Get over it.

Tick-tock-Obama-be-on-a-rock -- 2012 is a coming.

Hypocrisy
 

On Mar 19, 4:40*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 2:21 PM, wrote:



On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
*wrote:

On Mar 19, 2:59 pm, *wrote:
In ,
says...

On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. *So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? *With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. *Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they *are mindless
ninnies.

Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people.

Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do not
explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business with him.
* *Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history.

Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and Obama to
stuff it. *So this is their revenge. *These power hungry mogals.....
Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not
looking for more expensive wars.

Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's shooting
of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed minority in
Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is.

Gaddafi probably called Obama a name. He is a thin skinned dude for
sure...

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Now I see the difference. *Obama is president now and
Bush was president then.

Yes, Obama is president. Get over it.

Tick-tock-Obama-be-on-a-rock -- 2012 is a coming.

Did "boating All out" support the war in Iraq, if not, he has no
business calling anyone a traitor.
Of course, all you libs have to do is to say "Bush was right and we
were wrong" so I can believe you are in this for the right reasons and
not just to get Libya's oil for George Soros. If you do that, then I
will support you, otherwise, "NO".

Hypocrisy
 

On 19/03/2011 2:44 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Mar 19, 4:40 pm, wrote:
On 19/03/2011 2:21 PM, wrote:



On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Mar 19, 2:59 pm, wrote:
In ,
says...

On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people.

Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do not
explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business with him.
Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history.

Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and Obama to
stuff it. So this is their revenge. These power hungry mogals....
Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not
looking for more expensive wars.

Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's shooting
of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed minority in
Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is.

Gaddafi probably called Obama a name. He is a thin skinned dude for
sure...

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Now I see the difference. Obama is president now and
Bush was president then.

Yes, Obama is president. Get over it.

Tick-tock-Obama-be-on-a-rock -- 2012 is a coming.

Did "boating All out" support the war in Iraq, if not, he has no
business calling anyone a traitor.
Of course, all you libs have to do is to say "Bush was right and we
were wrong" so I can believe you are in this for the right reasons and
not just to get Libya's oil for George Soros. If you do that, then I
will support you, otherwise, "NO".

Hey, 80% of Americans are the best people....my quarel is with DC
corruption, arrogance, ego and more corruption. Americans need to
realize their country is more on the rocks now than ever before --
government is out of control!

Some of my best friends are Americans!! America is a great country but
right now you are in the middle of a Pearl Harbour of politics and
econoomics. And people havent woke up yet.

Punding Iraq and Afganistan were justified, US was 9/11 attacked. Not
sure we should be there this long, but the attack was prevoked and
Bushed asked congess is this war?

Obama doesn't think he has to live by the rules.

Hypocrisy
 

Frogwatch wrote:
On Mar 19, 4:40 pm, wrote:
On 19/03/2011 2:21 PM, wrote:



On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:
On Mar 19, 2:59 pm, wrote:
In ,
says...
On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.
Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people.
Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do not
explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business with him.
Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history.
Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and Obama to
stuff it. So this is their revenge. These power hungry mogals....
Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not
looking for more expensive wars.
Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's shooting
of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed minority in
Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is.
Gaddafi probably called Obama a name. He is a thin skinned dude for
sure...
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Now I see the difference. Obama is president now and
Bush was president then.
Yes, Obama is president. Get over it.
Tick-tock-Obama-be-on-a-rock -- 2012 is a coming.

Did "boating All out" support the war in Iraq, if not, he has no
business calling anyone a traitor.
Of course, all you libs have to do is to say "Bush was right and we
were wrong" so I can believe you are in this for the right reasons and
not just to get Libya's oil for George Soros. If you do that, then I
will support you, otherwise, "NO".


You right-wing crackpots - you, canuck, herring, snotty = are really up
in arms over this. Warms my heart. Of course, there isn't an ounce of
logic or sense in any of your pronouncements.

Hypocrisy
 

In article a20edf12-591f-4e9f-bbe9-e5b8bbdc3492
@n2g2000prj.googlegroups.com, says...


Did "boating All out" support the war in Iraq, if not, he has no
business calling anyone a traitor.
Of course, all you libs have to do is to say "Bush was right and we
were wrong" so I can believe you are in this for the right reasons and
not just to get Libya's oil for George Soros. If you do that, then I
will support you, otherwise, "NO".

Although the French are in the lead, our men and women are in danger.
Our American sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, brothers and sisters.
You've said you don't support them.
I don't give a **** about your infantile politics.
A traitor is a traitor. Easy to spot.
No decent American can take you seriously.
Now get back in your cracker swamp with them big roaches.
We don't need the likes of you in the company of Patriots.
There are still some here who have served Freedom's call.
And that ain't you.

Hypocrisy
 

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:30:21 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 2:20 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:58:38 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:53 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:51:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374
@z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says...

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida
crackers or Virginia ex-military.
The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our
patriots serving in the armed forces.
So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people
be.
After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as
governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything.

Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil
war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different.

Too bad you don't know anything about history.

So fleabagger when are you buying your jack boots? I will say,
politiicans do like good little sheeples like you. Lead by the nose types.

You've already got them in your closet, along with your SS uniform.

You would follow Obama to hell.

Last I check acts of war required congressional approval. Well Obama
does not think so, he just launched cruise missles into Libya. Yet
ignores unarmed non-violent protesters getting shot to death in Yemen
and Behrain....

Hypocritical president of yours needs an impeachment.

You're so stupid, even Hell wouldn't let you in, no less the US.

Hypocrisy
 

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:40:07 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 2:21 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Mar 19, 2:59 pm, wrote:
In ,
says...





On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people.

Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do not
explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business with him.
Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history.

Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and Obama to
stuff it. So this is their revenge. These power hungry mogals....
Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not
looking for more expensive wars.

Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's shooting
of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed minority in
Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is.

Gaddafi probably called Obama a name. He is a thin skinned dude for
sure...

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Now I see the difference. Obama is president now and
Bush was president then.

Yes, Obama is president. Get over it.

Tick-tock-Obama-be-on-a-rock -- 2012 is a coming.

No clock required to time your stupidity.

Hypocrisy
 

On 19/03/2011 3:06 PM, Harryk wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Mar 19, 4:40 pm, wrote:
On 19/03/2011 2:21 PM, wrote:



On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:
On Mar 19, 2:59 pm, wrote:
In ,
says...
On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make
sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi
Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and
most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC
issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.
Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people.
Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do not
explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business
with him.
Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history.
Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and Obama to
stuff it. So this is their revenge. These power hungry mogals....
Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not
looking for more expensive wars.
Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's
shooting
of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed
minority in
Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is.
Gaddafi probably called Obama a name. He is a thin skinned dude for
sure...
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Now I see the difference. Obama is president now and
Bush was president then.
Yes, Obama is president. Get over it.
Tick-tock-Obama-be-on-a-rock -- 2012 is a coming.

Did "boating All out" support the war in Iraq, if not, he has no
business calling anyone a traitor.
Of course, all you libs have to do is to say "Bush was right and we
were wrong" so I can believe you are in this for the right reasons and
not just to get Libya's oil for George Soros. If you do that, then I
will support you, otherwise, "NO".


You right-wing crackpots - you, canuck, herring, snotty = are really up
in arms over this. Warms my heart. Of course, there isn't an ounce of
logic or sense in any of your pronouncements.

No money to pay the bills but plenty for war. Makes Obama a war monger.

Hypocrisy
 

On 19/03/2011 3:15 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlea20edf12-591f-4e9f-bbe9-e5b8bbdc3492
@n2g2000prj.googlegroups.com, says...


Did "boating All out" support the war in Iraq, if not, he has no
business calling anyone a traitor.
Of course, all you libs have to do is to say "Bush was right and we
were wrong" so I can believe you are in this for the right reasons and
not just to get Libya's oil for George Soros. If you do that, then I
will support you, otherwise, "NO".

Although the French are in the lead, our men and women are in danger.
Our American sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, brothers and sisters.
You've said you don't support them.
I don't give a **** about your infantile politics.
A traitor is a traitor. Easy to spot.
No decent American can take you seriously.
Now get back in your cracker swamp with them big roaches.
We don't need the likes of you in the company of Patriots.
There are still some here who have served Freedom's call.
And that ain't you.

Funny, then how come US isn't invading Yemen, Behrain, Tunisia or
putting a leash on the Hamas?

Hypocrisy
 

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 3:06 PM, Harryk wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Mar 19, 4:40 pm, wrote:
On 19/03/2011 2:21 PM, wrote:



On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:
On Mar 19, 2:59 pm, wrote:
In ,
says...
On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make
sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi
Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and
most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC
issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.
Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people.
Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do not
explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business
with him.
Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history.
Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and Obama to
stuff it. So this is their revenge. These power hungry mogals....
Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not
looking for more expensive wars.
Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's
shooting
of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed
minority in
Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is.
Gaddafi probably called Obama a name. He is a thin skinned dude for
sure...
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Now I see the difference. Obama is president now and
Bush was president then.
Yes, Obama is president. Get over it.
Tick-tock-Obama-be-on-a-rock -- 2012 is a coming.

Did "boating All out" support the war in Iraq, if not, he has no
business calling anyone a traitor.
Of course, all you libs have to do is to say "Bush was right and we
were wrong" so I can believe you are in this for the right reasons and
not just to get Libya's oil for George Soros. If you do that, then I
will support you, otherwise, "NO".


You right-wing crackpots - you, canuck, herring, snotty = are really up
in arms over this. Warms my heart. Of course, there isn't an ounce of
logic or sense in any of your pronouncements.

No money to pay the bills but plenty for war. Makes Obama a war monger.


Bush started two serious wars and lowered taxes.

Hypocrisy
 

On Mar 19, 5:22*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 3:15 PM, Boating All Out wrote:



In articlea20edf12-591f-4e9f-bbe9-e5b8bbdc3492
@n2g2000prj.googlegroups.com, says...

Did "boating All out" support the war in Iraq, if not, he has no
business calling anyone a traitor.
Of course, all you libs have to do is to say "Bush was right and we
were wrong" so I can believe you are in this for the right reasons and
not just to get Libya's oil for George Soros. *If you do that, then I
will support you, otherwise, "NO".

Although the French are in the lead, our men and women are in danger.
Our American sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, brothers and sisters.
You've said you don't support them.
I don't give a **** about your infantile politics.
A traitor is a traitor. *Easy to spot.
No decent American can take you seriously.
Now get back in your cracker swamp with them big roaches.
We don't need the likes of you in the company of Patriots.
There are still some here who have served Freedom's call.
And that ain't you.

Funny, then how come US isn't invading Yemen, Behrain, Tunisia or
putting a leash on the Hamas?

I guess that means that "Boater all Out" was a traitor during the IRaq
war.
No blood for Soros Oil!

Hypocrisy
 

On 19/03/2011 3:31 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 3:06 PM, Harryk wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Mar 19, 4:40 pm, wrote:
On 19/03/2011 2:21 PM, wrote:



On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:
On Mar 19, 2:59 pm,
wrote:
In ,
says...
On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make
sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to
attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi
Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and
most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK
IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC
issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.
Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people.
Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do
not
explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business
with him.
Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history.
Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and
Obama to
stuff it. So this is their revenge. These power hungry mogals....
Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not
looking for more expensive wars.
Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's
shooting
of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed
minority in
Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is.
Gaddafi probably called Obama a name. He is a thin skinned dude for
sure...
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Now I see the difference. Obama is president now
and
Bush was president then.
Yes, Obama is president. Get over it.
Tick-tock-Obama-be-on-a-rock -- 2012 is a coming.

Did "boating All out" support the war in Iraq, if not, he has no
business calling anyone a traitor.
Of course, all you libs have to do is to say "Bush was right and we
were wrong" so I can believe you are in this for the right reasons and
not just to get Libya's oil for George Soros. If you do that, then I
will support you, otherwise, "NO".


You right-wing crackpots - you, canuck, herring, snotty = are really up
in arms over this. Warms my heart. Of course, there isn't an ounce of
logic or sense in any of your pronouncements.

No money to pay the bills but plenty for war. Makes Obama a war monger.


Bush started two serious wars and lowered taxes.

Actually, my memory is not short like a democrat-liberal. If I recall
correctly Bush went to a congress and from both sides of the house got
ful supprt for thse wars and taxes.

Time for Obama to realize he has been in office well over two years and
now faces a total currency collapse. An economic melt down, hyper
inflation.

Say about this time next year lets chat again. Your food prices are
aobut to take a 12% jump in one year. Hold me to it in one year. It
might be more but not less than 12%

You can't keep printing/creating money faster than Americans consume
toilet paper or the currency itself will become toilet paper.

Hypocrisy
 

On 19/03/2011 3:31 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Mar 19, 5:22 pm, wrote:
On 19/03/2011 3:15 PM, Boating All Out wrote:



In articlea20edf12-591f-4e9f-bbe9-e5b8bbdc3492
@n2g2000prj.googlegroups.com, says...

Did "boating All out" support the war in Iraq, if not, he has no
business calling anyone a traitor.
Of course, all you libs have to do is to say "Bush was right and we
were wrong" so I can believe you are in this for the right reasons and
not just to get Libya's oil for George Soros. If you do that, then I
will support you, otherwise, "NO".

Although the French are in the lead, our men and women are in danger.
Our American sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, brothers and sisters.
You've said you don't support them.
I don't give a **** about your infantile politics.
A traitor is a traitor. Easy to spot.
No decent American can take you seriously.
Now get back in your cracker swamp with them big roaches.
We don't need the likes of you in the company of Patriots.
There are still some here who have served Freedom's call.
And that ain't you.

Funny, then how come US isn't invading Yemen, Behrain, Tunisia or
putting a leash on the Hamas?

I guess that means that "Boater all Out" was a traitor during the IRaq
war.
No blood for Soros Oil!

Myth: America needs to be in the middle east for oil.

Truth: If we want oil, get Canada and the US to band together for food
export controls. If corn, wheat, barley, oats all had oil for food, you
would get $20 barrel over night. And not one drop of blood.

We can turn food into ethanol much easier than they can drink oil for food.

Hypocrisy
 

On 19/03/2011 3:17 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:30:21 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 2:20 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:58:38 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:53 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:51:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374
@z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says...

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida
crackers or Virginia ex-military.
The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our
patriots serving in the armed forces.
So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people
be.
After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as
governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything.

Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil
war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different.

Too bad you don't know anything about history.

So fleabagger when are you buying your jack boots? I will say,
politiicans do like good little sheeples like you. Lead by the nose types.

You've already got them in your closet, along with your SS uniform.

You would follow Obama to hell.

Last I check acts of war required congressional approval. Well Obama
does not think so, he just launched cruise missles into Libya. Yet
ignores unarmed non-violent protesters getting shot to death in Yemen
and Behrain....

Hypocritical president of yours needs an impeachment.

You're so stupid, even Hell wouldn't let you in, no less the US.

Don't worry. No plans to be in the US unless it is to board a cruise
ship.

Hypocrisy
 

In article ,
says...

Funny, then how come US isn't invading Yemen, Behrain, Tunisia or
putting a leash on the Hamas?

This kind of stupid talk is why traitors like O'hara, Ingersoll and
Herring, and foreign America-haters like you get no respect here.
The U.S. is not invading Libya.
All the dumb-ass invading happened when GWB was President.
I supported that, because I always support our troops.
I'm an American, a vet, and a Patriot.
What's got y'all confused is Obama ain't a dumb-ass like y'all.
You don't know how to act or talk because of that.
You're just plain confused. Like you been rope-a-doped.
So you turned traitor. No surprise, since you're scum.
Pretty much like cornered possums.
All hissin' and droolin'.
But possums don't stink as much and are prettier than traitors.
Let me explain it to you.
Obama's worked it out so the French, English, Italians and A-rabs
will take care of Qadaffi. Maybe Canadians too.
Our boys will provide "unique" assets, which is cruise missiles,
satellite surveillance, electronic jamming, etc.
We already got plenty of fighting business elsewhere.
We ain't invading anybody, and if things go as expected we won't lose
any of our brave fighting men, and the Libyans will depose Qadaffi.
I support our troops, unlike the confused traitors who have spoken up
here. No matter what war.
How many times do you jack-asses have to be hit with a 2x4 to understand
that?
I might understand your confusion if this was complicated, or you had
behaved like decent men.
But it ain't complicated, and you haven't acted decently.
So my only answer to you is calling you out as traitors, and a stain on
America.
A stain on Canada from you. They should deport you to Somalia.

Hypocrisy
 

On 19/03/2011 5:10 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In ,
says...

Funny, then how come US isn't invading Yemen, Behrain, Tunisia or
putting a leash on the Hamas?

This kind of stupid talk is why traitors like O'hara, Ingersoll and
Herring, and foreign America-haters like you get no respect here.
The U.S. is not invading Libya.

Oh, just bombing the hell out of them for one man. Why not just go for
Gadafi? Why drop fighters onto civilians and blow up military that in
fact believe they are trying to put order in their country?

Why not just go for Gadafi directly? Why make the whole nation pay for
a political grudge match?

Oh, big bully showing them how cruise missles work... ya... real cowards
in Washington.

A stain on Canada from you. They should deport you to Somalia.

Hey, I am no lover of Islam. But I can say, with the way the US gets
into wars, they might have a point. But I don't agree with terrorism, I
believe terrorists should be simply shot. Take Omar Khadr, Canadian in
Gitmo -- why do you pander to him? Take him out and shoot him.

Trouble is these wars...always get the civilians eathingt he shrapnel
when the big power idiots want to play war.

Hypocrisy
 

In article ,
says...

On 19/03/2011 5:10 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In ,
says...

Funny, then how come US isn't invading Yemen, Behrain, Tunisia or
putting a leash on the Hamas?

This kind of stupid talk is why traitors like O'hara, Ingersoll and
Herring, and foreign America-haters like you get no respect here.
The U.S. is not invading Libya.

Oh, just bombing the hell out of them for one man. Why not just go for
Gadafi? Why drop fighters onto civilians and blow up military that in
fact believe they are trying to put order in their country?


So you support Qadaffi. Figures.
Puts you right in there with the American traitors of this newsgroup.
Buzz off. I'm done with you.

Hypocrisy
 

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:27:38 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 3:17 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:30:21 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 2:20 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:58:38 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:53 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:51:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374
@z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says...

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida
crackers or Virginia ex-military.
The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our
patriots serving in the armed forces.
So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people
be.
After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as
governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything.

Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil
war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different.

Too bad you don't know anything about history.

So fleabagger when are you buying your jack boots? I will say,
politiicans do like good little sheeples like you. Lead by the nose types.

You've already got them in your closet, along with your SS uniform.

You would follow Obama to hell.

Last I check acts of war required congressional approval. Well Obama
does not think so, he just launched cruise missles into Libya. Yet
ignores unarmed non-violent protesters getting shot to death in Yemen
and Behrain....

Hypocritical president of yours needs an impeachment.

You're so stupid, even Hell wouldn't let you in, no less the US.

Don't worry. No plans to be in the US unless it is to board a cruise
ship.

Don't worry, it's doubtful they would even let you board a cruise
ship.

Hypocrisy
 

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 15:39:50 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 3:31 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 3:06 PM, Harryk wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Mar 19, 4:40 pm, wrote:
On 19/03/2011 2:21 PM, wrote:



On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:
On Mar 19, 2:59 pm,
wrote:
In ,
says...
On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make
sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to
attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi
Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and
most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK
IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC
issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.
Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people.
Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do
not
explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business
with him.
Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history.
Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and
Obama to
stuff it. So this is their revenge. These power hungry mogals....
Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not
looking for more expensive wars.
Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's
shooting
of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed
minority in
Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is.
Gaddafi probably called Obama a name. He is a thin skinned dude for
sure...
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Now I see the difference. Obama is president now
and
Bush was president then.
Yes, Obama is president. Get over it.
Tick-tock-Obama-be-on-a-rock -- 2012 is a coming.

Did "boating All out" support the war in Iraq, if not, he has no
business calling anyone a traitor.
Of course, all you libs have to do is to say "Bush was right and we
were wrong" so I can believe you are in this for the right reasons and
not just to get Libya's oil for George Soros. If you do that, then I
will support you, otherwise, "NO".


You right-wing crackpots - you, canuck, herring, snotty = are really up
in arms over this. Warms my heart. Of course, there isn't an ounce of
logic or sense in any of your pronouncements.

No money to pay the bills but plenty for war. Makes Obama a war monger.


Bush started two serious wars and lowered taxes.

Actually, my memory is not short like a democrat-liberal. If I recall
correctly Bush went to a congress and from both sides of the house got
ful supprt for thse wars and taxes.

Time for Obama to realize he has been in office well over two years and
now faces a total currency collapse. An economic melt down, hyper
inflation.

Say about this time next year lets chat again. Your food prices are
aobut to take a 12% jump in one year. Hold me to it in one year. It
might be more but not less than 12%

You can't keep printing/creating money faster than Americans consume
toilet paper or the currency itself will become toilet paper.

Yeah after lying to Congress and faking intel, sure he got approval.

Hypocrisy
 

Hypocrisy
 

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

Funny, then how come US isn't invading Yemen, Behrain, Tunisia or
putting a leash on the Hamas?

This kind of stupid talk is why traitors like

You can call us traitors all you want, simply because we don't toe the
looney line you toe, but it only shows how ignorant and intolerant you
as a progressive are and how much YOU hate the United States and the way
we live and rule here...