On Mar 19, 10:38*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam.

international law

no troops in libya

a trillion spent in iraq

shall i go on?

If President Chauncey Gardiner handles this as well as he does the
economy................

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 20:15:11 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Mar 19, 10:38*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam.

international law

no troops in libya

a trillion spent in iraq

shall i go on?

If President Chauncey Gardiner handles this as well as he does the
economy................

he's doing ALOT better than bush

but, of course, bush is white

On 21/03/2011 3:46 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 20:15:11 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Mar 19, 10:38 pm, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam.

international law

no troops in libya

a trillion spent in iraq

shall i go on?

If President Chauncey Gardiner handles this as well as he does the
economy................

he's doing ALOT better than bush

but, of course, bush is white

Is that an excuse or an admistion of deficiency?

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:51:18 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 21/03/2011 3:46 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 20:15:11 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Mar 19, 10:38 pm, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 20

If President Chauncey Gardiner handles this as well as he does the
economy................

he's doing ALOT better than bush

but, of course, bush is white

Is that an excuse or an admistion of deficiency?

merely an accusation of your racism