You should tell us what the links are, kind of like using Tiny URL and
not telling. I think some folks think it's a "surprise" thing but a lot
of folks don't really have the time to click on each and every link just
to see if they are interested or not..
The author of the post should be a pretty good indicator as to whether
you should open his links. After all, would you open any link Harry
Krause posts?
Never, ever, ever, ever... would I open a link by that pedophile
sicko... But with John it's just that we are of different tastes and
most of what he posts up is just blah to me... I mean, great stuff and
all but nothing I would wait to download to see. Now if he said I have a
link here of the such and such by so and so orchestra, I probably
wouldn't click, but then if the next link said I dunno', such and such a
Saxophone player, whatever, I might just click on that...
Sounds like you are just lazy. It's not always only the content.
Sometimes it's a clever troll. Posting a full description would ruin it.
Lazy, because I don't need to spend all that time clicking blind links?
Ok....
'All that time'???
How long does it take your computer to load the browser and get to the site? For
me, it's a double click and two seconds. I'm using Mozilla Firefox. Maybe you
should upgrade your browser, or invest in a new 'puter.
When I was using the 486, it took me a little longer to get to the web site.