On 15/03/2011 7:21 AM, HarryisPaul wrote:
In , princecraft49
@gmail.com says...

Was that you, Johnny.... always preaching about the benefits of nuclear
power?
Good I guess, as long as you don't have an earthquake.

You stupid ****! Do you realize that in the U.S. the standard design for
nuke plants for sunamis, earthquakes, flood, etc. is to use a 10,000
year event span?

So does Japan claim the same. You trust these *******s to tll the truth?

I have some beach front land for sale cheap too...

On 3/15/11 4:43 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 15/03/2011 7:21 AM, HarryisPaul wrote:
In , princecraft49
@gmail.com says...

Was that you, Johnny.... always preaching about the benefits of nuclear
power?
Good I guess, as long as you don't have an earthquake.

You stupid ****! Do you realize that in the U.S. the standard design for
nuke plants for sunamis, earthquakes, flood, etc. is to use a 10,000
year event span?

So does Japan claim the same. You trust these *******s to tll the truth?

I have some beach front land for sale cheap too...


You should know that "HarryisPaul" is the former loogy here and doesn't
know or care about nuclear reactors. He only posts to take cheap and
repetitive potshots at me and another poster. Along with Scott
Ingersoll, he is about the dumbest poster who ever showed his handle here.

On 3/15/11 5:05 PM, Harryk wrote:
I have some beach front land for sale cheap too...


He only posts to take cheap and
repetitive potshots at......

This sounds like you are talking about yourself. Cheap, childish,
repetitive potshots are all you do.

In article ,
says...

On 3/15/11 4:43 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 15/03/2011 7:21 AM, HarryisPaul wrote:
In , princecraft49
@gmail.com says...

Was that you, Johnny.... always preaching about the benefits of nuclear
power?
Good I guess, as long as you don't have an earthquake.

You stupid ****! Do you realize that in the U.S. the standard design for
nuke plants for sunamis, earthquakes, flood, etc. is to use a 10,000
year event span?

So does Japan claim the same. You trust these *******s to tll the truth?

I have some beach front land for sale cheap too...


You should know that "HarryisPaul" is the former loogy here and doesn't
know or care about nuclear reactors. He only posts to take cheap and
repetitive potshots at me and another poster. Along with Scott
Ingersoll, he is about the dumbest poster who ever showed his handle here.

You are dead wrong again, idiot! Care to wager? I'm guessing you'll be a
coward.

On 3/15/11 9:05 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:43:27 -0600,
wrote:

You stupid ****! Do you realize that in the U.S. the standard design for
nuke plants for sunamis, earthquakes, flood, etc. is to use a 10,000
year event span?

So does Japan claim the same. You trust these *******s to tll the truth?

I have some beach front land for sale cheap too...

You probably should not put a nuke plant there. If it was 25 miles up
the river it would not be knocked out by a tsunami.

BTW has there EVER been a tsunami in the Atlantic?


Portugal, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands have experienced them.
There probably have been other tsunamis in the Atlantic.

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 3/15/11 9:05 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:43:27 -0600,
wrote:

You stupid ****! Do you realize that in the U.S. the standard design for
nuke plants for sunamis, earthquakes, flood, etc. is to use a 10,000
year event span?

So does Japan claim the same. You trust these *******s to tll the truth?

I have some beach front land for sale cheap too...

You probably should not put a nuke plant there. If it was 25 miles up
the river it would not be knocked out by a tsunami.

BTW has there EVER been a tsunami in the Atlantic?


Portugal, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands have experienced them.
There probably have been other tsunamis in the Atlantic.

Maybe when your father made his trans-Atlantic trip in a 22' runabout??

On 15/03/2011 7:05 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:43:27 -0600,
wrote:

You stupid ****! Do you realize that in the U.S. the standard design for
nuke plants for sunamis, earthquakes, flood, etc. is to use a 10,000
year event span?

So does Japan claim the same. You trust these *******s to tll the truth?

I have some beach front land for sale cheap too...

You probably should not put a nuke plant there. If it was 25 miles up
the river it would not be knocked out by a tsunami.

BTW has there EVER been a tsunami in the Atlantic?

Keep in mind the Japanese nuke facility was designed by non-other than
General Electric of the USA. So how many of these problematic reactors
are there? Probably more than a few utility companies wanting to ignore
this imutable fact. How many of these reactors ARE in your back yard?

On 3/16/11 12:31 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 15/03/2011 7:05 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:43:27 -0600,
wrote:

You stupid ****! Do you realize that in the U.S. the standard design
for
nuke plants for sunamis, earthquakes, flood, etc. is to use a 10,000
year event span?

So does Japan claim the same. You trust these *******s to tll the truth?

I have some beach front land for sale cheap too...

You probably should not put a nuke plant there. If it was 25 miles up
the river it would not be knocked out by a tsunami.

BTW has there EVER been a tsunami in the Atlantic?

Keep in mind the Japanese nuke facility was designed by non-other than
General Electric of the USA. So how many of these problematic reactors
are there? Probably more than a few utility companies wanting to ignore
this imutable fact. How many of these reactors ARE in your back yard?


The nukes in our neighborhood were designed by Combustion Engineering,
now owned by Westinghouse. They're close to 40 years old.

In article ,
says...

On 3/16/11 12:31 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 15/03/2011 7:05 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:43:27 -0600,
wrote:

You stupid ****! Do you realize that in the U.S. the standard design
for
nuke plants for sunamis, earthquakes, flood, etc. is to use a 10,000
year event span?

So does Japan claim the same. You trust these *******s to tll the truth?

I have some beach front land for sale cheap too...

You probably should not put a nuke plant there. If it was 25 miles up
the river it would not be knocked out by a tsunami.

BTW has there EVER been a tsunami in the Atlantic?

Keep in mind the Japanese nuke facility was designed by non-other than
General Electric of the USA. So how many of these problematic reactors
are there? Probably more than a few utility companies wanting to ignore
this imutable fact. How many of these reactors ARE in your back yard?


The nukes in our neighborhood were designed by Combustion Engineering,
now owned by Westinghouse. They're close to 40 years old.

Ooops, you said yesterday that all were built by GE.....