Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net... "jps" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net... Clintons Anoint Clark By William Safire Golly, I wonder which side of the fence Willie Safire sits? Perhaps Bill understands Dems would be more likely to unseat Bush with a southern military man that a northern doctor? I guess that simple fact was too much of stretch for Willie Safire's brain. What are your feelings on the question I asked? "How will Dean like being politically maneuvered into irrelevancy by the Clintons...and will he launch a third party candidacy out of spite?" The Clintons reportedly encouraged him to run to give the Dems the best chance of winning. I know of no more of an endorsement than that. You cannot cite an endorsement unless Bill and Hillary comes out and says "I support so-and-so." Otherwise, it's the same as encouraging Dean or Gephardt or any of the other players to join the party and make it as strong a field as possible. Second, I don't think for a moment that Dean would launch a third party candidacy... |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "jps" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "jps" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net... Clintons Anoint Clark By William Safire Golly, I wonder which side of the fence Willie Safire sits? Perhaps Bill understands Dems would be more likely to unseat Bush with a southern military man that a northern doctor? I guess that simple fact was too much of stretch for Willie Safire's brain. What are your feelings on the question I asked? "How will Dean like being politically maneuvered into irrelevancy by the Clintons...and will he launch a third party candidacy out of spite?" The Clintons reportedly encouraged him to run to give the Dems the best chance of winning. I know of no more of an endorsement than that. You cannot cite an endorsement unless Bill and Hillary comes out and says "I support so-and-so." Huh? In your warped opinion, "encouraging someone to run" isn't the same as "endorsing them"?!? What about Bill calling Clark and Hillary the "two rising stars in the Democratic party"? Is that an endorsement? Otherwise, it's the same as encouraging Dean or Gephardt or any of the other players to join the party and make it as strong a field as possible. But they *didn't* "encourage" any of the other guys to run. Second, I don't think for a moment that Dean would launch a third party candidacy... If he feels back-doored or betrayed, I think he would. Afterall, before the Clintons maneuvered Clark into the lime-light, it belonged to Dean. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net... Huh? In your warped opinion, "encouraging someone to run" isn't the same as "endorsing them"?!? What about Bill calling Clark and Hillary the "two rising stars in the Democratic party"? Is that an endorsement? Huh? In your warped opinion, encouraging someone to run is the same as endorsing them. Out of context it can certainly be made to seem like an endorsement, but only to those who'd like to spin it that way. In context he's standing beside his wife so he cannot ignore her and says the right thing. Since Clark is a relative unknown, it's easy to say that he's a rising star since he's barely cleared the horizon. We can safely assume the other candidates are already bona fide stars in the Democratic party, otherwise they wouldn't have enough support to be standing on the stage. Next point: It's not likely the other candidates went to the Clintons seeking their input. Clark did and received their encouragement. Put in the same position, few politicians would be stupid enough to say "no, I'm already supporting someone else, don't bother" unless the race was already very apparent. It's not. Is it your supposition that the Clintons sought Clark out to encourage him? Otherwise, it's the same as encouraging Dean or Gephardt or any of the other players to join the party and make it as strong a field as possible. But they *didn't* "encourage" any of the other guys to run. They didn't have to!!! And, how do you know that the Clintons didn't call Mario Cuomo to try to pry him out onto the stage. You only know what's reported or falls into the hands of the media. Second, I don't think for a moment that Dean would launch a third party candidacy... If he feels back-doored or betrayed, I think he would. Afterall, before the Clintons maneuvered Clark into the lime-light, it belonged to Dean. That's rolling around in your head. No one with an ounce of common sense would attempt to run a third party candidacy, other than the Greens. Most of their constituency has had four years of Bush and won't be making the same mistake again. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "jps" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net... Huh? In your warped opinion, "encouraging someone to run" isn't the same as "endorsing them"?!? What about Bill calling Clark and Hillary the "two rising stars in the Democratic party"? Is that an endorsement? Huh? In your warped opinion, encouraging someone to run is the same as endorsing them. Out of context it can certainly be made to seem like an endorsement, but only to those who'd like to spin it that way. In context he's standing beside his wife so he cannot ignore her and says the right thing. Since Clark is a relative unknown, it's easy to say that he's a rising star since he's barely cleared the horizon. We can safely assume the other candidates are already bona fide stars in the Democratic party, otherwise they wouldn't have enough support to be standing on the stage. Next point: It's not likely the other candidates went to the Clintons seeking their input. Clark did and received their encouragement. Put in the same position, few politicians would be stupid enough to say "no, I'm already supporting someone else, don't bother" unless the race was already very apparent. It's not. Is it your supposition that the Clintons sought Clark out to encourage him? Yes. Otherwise, it's the same as encouraging Dean or Gephardt or any of the other players to join the party and make it as strong a field as possible. But they *didn't* "encourage" any of the other guys to run. They didn't have to!!! And, how do you know that the Clintons didn't call Mario Cuomo to try to pry him out onto the stage. You only know what's reported or falls into the hands of the media. I know they didn't make a pitch at Mario 'cause after the way they sunk his son, Andrew, he'd have told 'em to **** off. Andrew was sold out for the black vote . The party wanted McCall, and Andrew would have got trounced anyhow...so Hillary and Bill cast Andrew aside. Second, I don't think for a moment that Dean would launch a third party candidacy... If he feels back-doored or betrayed, I think he would. Afterall, before the Clintons maneuvered Clark into the lime-light, it belonged to Dean. That's rolling around in your head. No one with an ounce of common sense would attempt to run a third party candidacy, other than the Greens. Most of their constituency has had four years of Bush and won't be making the same mistake again. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Howard Dean in 2004 | General | |||
OT--new candidate | General | |||
Were trailers full of hot air? | General |