In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article 12839972-8bed-4183-a3db-8908dfb6c5a1
@w9g2000prg.googlegroups.com, says...

On Feb 23, 4:31*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Here is what Wiki says about Gaddafi:
The 27-year-old Gaddafi, with a taste for safari suits and sunglasses,
then sought to become the new "Che Guevara of the age".[9] To
accomplish this Gaddafi turned Libya into a haven for anti-Western
radicals, where any group, supposedly, could receive weapons and
financial assistance, provided they claimed to be fighting imperialism.
[9]

I remember campus radicals expousing both Mao's "Little Red Book" and
Gadaffi's "Little Green Book" and making banners with the thoughts of
Gaddafi.
Of course, Gaddafi is best buds with Chavez, another darling of the
left.
Now, Libs try to rewrite their history of liking Gaddafi as he now
turns to mass murder. *If we did not have instant video of such, the
left would still be trying to deny it was happening just like they
tried to deny Stalin's or Mao's crimes.

Leftism inevitably leads to mass murder.

It was also stated in " Bowling For Columbine " that Gaddafi was an "
ex CIA Man" .

Well then, if Michal Moore said it.. It can be summarily dismissed

Hey, about that. I recall that when there was significant snow and cold
that most of the righties stated here and elsewhere that because it was
cold, that it was proof positive that global warming doesn't exist.
Well, in my neck of the woods, we've had record breaking highs, and no
significant rain. So, using the right's own analogy, that would mean
that there is proof positive that global warming DOESN'T exist, no?

Bunch of bull****. Not one of us here said that but we are getting used
to you all on the left just making it up as you go along. Kind of like
the "violence at tea party rallies". Which is of course a fantasy of the
left. But at the same time, it seems each and every day, someone on the
left (paid by Organizing for America/Barak Obama) is attacking and using
violence and intimidation to make a point...

So, show us where one person here said what you suggest, oh wait, you
can't.. you just made it up.

This thread was titled "Who Turned off Global Warming?" and the post
was:

I WANT ANSWERS!!!


What with this Norwest wind bringing all that CANADIAN cold air down
from CANADA.


Freakin' Canada.


This time I can blame CANADA.


Canada - only good for hockey and dead baby seals.


And cold air.


And you replied:

Trick question, there never was any "Global Warming"... Just Al Gore
"Global Taxing"...

If you need more, just hit me up, there's many, many conversations here,
and other places by you, Tom, etc. that explicitly claim there asking
where is this global warming, just because it happens to be cold and
snowy.

Oh you dopey dishonest liberal. You know that was Tom, and it was
sarcastic and you know it.

And you agreed with it.

(TIC)

On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:52:34 -0500, HarryisPaul wrote:

In article ,
says...

In article 12839972-8bed-4183-a3db-8908dfb6c5a1
@w9g2000prg.googlegroups.com, says...

On Feb 23, 4:31*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Here is what Wiki says about Gaddafi:
The 27-year-old Gaddafi, with a taste for safari suits and sunglasses,
then sought to become the new "Che Guevara of the age".[9] To
accomplish this Gaddafi turned Libya into a haven for anti-Western
radicals, where any group, supposedly, could receive weapons and
financial assistance, provided they claimed to be fighting imperialism.
[9]

I remember campus radicals expousing both Mao's "Little Red Book" and
Gadaffi's "Little Green Book" and making banners with the thoughts of
Gaddafi.
Of course, Gaddafi is best buds with Chavez, another darling of the
left.
Now, Libs try to rewrite their history of liking Gaddafi as he now
turns to mass murder. *If we did not have instant video of such, the
left would still be trying to deny it was happening just like they
tried to deny Stalin's or Mao's crimes.

Leftism inevitably leads to mass murder.

It was also stated in " Bowling For Columbine " that Gaddafi was an "
ex CIA Man" .

Well then, if Michal Moore said it.. It can be summarily dismissed

Hey, about that. I recall that when there was significant snow and cold
that most of the righties stated here and elsewhere that because it was
cold, that it was proof positive that global warming doesn't exist.
Well, in my neck of the woods, we've had record breaking highs, and no
significant rain. So, using the right's own analogy, that would mean
that there is proof positive that global warming DOESN'T exist, no?

Most 'righties' don't deny the occurrence of global warming, or at least some
form of climate change.

The big question has to do with the involvement of mankind in same, and whether
or not sending lots of money to Al Gore is the solution.

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:31:01 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:

Here is what Wiki says about Gaddafi:
The 27-year-old Gaddafi, with a taste for safari suits and sunglasses,
then sought to become the new "Che Guevara of the age".[9] To
accomplish this Gaddafi turned Libya into a haven for anti-Western
radicals, where any group, supposedly, could receive weapons and
financial assistance, provided they claimed to be fighting imperialism.
[9]

I remember campus radicals expousing both Mao's "Little Red Book" and
Gadaffi's "Little Green Book" and making banners with the thoughts of
Gaddafi.
Of course, Gaddafi is best buds with Chavez, another darling of the
left.
Now, Libs try to rewrite their history of liking Gaddafi as he now
turns to mass murder. If we did not have instant video of such, the
left would still be trying to deny it was happening just like they
tried to deny Stalin's or Mao's crimes.

Leftism inevitably leads to mass murder.

So, I guess Bush should not have removed Libya from the list of state
sponsors of terrorism?

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:52:34 -0500, HarryisPaul wrote:

In article ,
says...

In article 12839972-8bed-4183-a3db-8908dfb6c5a1
@w9g2000prg.googlegroups.com, says...

On Feb 23, 4:31*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Here is what Wiki says about Gaddafi:
The 27-year-old Gaddafi, with a taste for safari suits and sunglasses,
then sought to become the new "Che Guevara of the age".[9] To
accomplish this Gaddafi turned Libya into a haven for anti-Western
radicals, where any group, supposedly, could receive weapons and
financial assistance, provided they claimed to be fighting imperialism.
[9]

I remember campus radicals expousing both Mao's "Little Red Book" and
Gadaffi's "Little Green Book" and making banners with the thoughts of
Gaddafi.
Of course, Gaddafi is best buds with Chavez, another darling of the
left.
Now, Libs try to rewrite their history of liking Gaddafi as he now
turns to mass murder. *If we did not have instant video of such, the
left would still be trying to deny it was happening just like they
tried to deny Stalin's or Mao's crimes.

Leftism inevitably leads to mass murder.

It was also stated in " Bowling For Columbine " that Gaddafi was an "
ex CIA Man" .

Well then, if Michal Moore said it.. It can be summarily dismissed

Hey, about that. I recall that when there was significant snow and cold
that most of the righties stated here and elsewhere that because it was
cold, that it was proof positive that global warming doesn't exist.
Well, in my neck of the woods, we've had record breaking highs, and no
significant rain. So, using the right's own analogy, that would mean
that there is proof positive that global warming DOESN'T exist, no?

Most 'righties' don't deny the occurrence of global warming, or at least some
form of climate change.

The big question has to do with the involvement of mankind in same, and whether
or not sending lots of money to Al Gore is the solution.

I know, nothing man has done has ever had an adverse affect on the
planet....

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:02:01 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 23/02/2011 2:31 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Here is what Wiki says about Gaddafi:
The 27-year-old Gaddafi, with a taste for safari suits and sunglasses,
then sought to become the new "Che Guevara of the age".[9] To
accomplish this Gaddafi turned Libya into a haven for anti-Western
radicals, where any group, supposedly, could receive weapons and
financial assistance, provided they claimed to be fighting imperialism.
[9]

I remember campus radicals expousing both Mao's "Little Red Book" and
Gadaffi's "Little Green Book" and making banners with the thoughts of
Gaddafi.
Of course, Gaddafi is best buds with Chavez, another darling of the
left.
Now, Libs try to rewrite their history of liking Gaddafi as he now
turns to mass murder. If we did not have instant video of such, the
left would still be trying to deny it was happening just like they
tried to deny Stalin's or Mao's crimes.

Leftism inevitably leads to mass murder.

And the poor house.

mexico isnt left. it's right. a few rich have all the money and the
people have zip

just like the right wants for the US

On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:27:01 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:52:34 -0500, HarryisPaul wrote:

In article ,
says...

In article 12839972-8bed-4183-a3db-8908dfb6c5a1
@w9g2000prg.googlegroups.com, says...

On Feb 23, 4:31*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Here is what Wiki says about Gaddafi:
The 27-year-old Gaddafi, with a taste for safari suits and sunglasses,
then sought to become the new "Che Guevara of the age".[9] To
accomplish this Gaddafi turned Libya into a haven for anti-Western
radicals, where any group, supposedly, could receive weapons and
financial assistance, provided they claimed to be fighting imperialism.
[9]

I remember campus radicals expousing both Mao's "Little Red Book" and
Gadaffi's "Little Green Book" and making banners with the thoughts of
Gaddafi.
Of course, Gaddafi is best buds with Chavez, another darling of the
left.
Now, Libs try to rewrite their history of liking Gaddafi as he now
turns to mass murder. *If we did not have instant video of such, the
left would still be trying to deny it was happening just like they
tried to deny Stalin's or Mao's crimes.

Leftism inevitably leads to mass murder.

It was also stated in " Bowling For Columbine " that Gaddafi was an "
ex CIA Man" .

Well then, if Michal Moore said it.. It can be summarily dismissed

Hey, about that. I recall that when there was significant snow and cold
that most of the righties stated here and elsewhere that because it was
cold, that it was proof positive that global warming doesn't exist.
Well, in my neck of the woods, we've had record breaking highs, and no
significant rain. So, using the right's own analogy, that would mean
that there is proof positive that global warming DOESN'T exist, no?

Most 'righties' don't deny the occurrence of global warming, or at least some
form of climate change.

The big question has to do with the involvement of mankind in same, and whether
or not sending lots of money to Al Gore is the solution.

Most righties are too ignorant or too interested in themselves to have
to care what adverse climate change cause by humans is actually doing.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:27:01 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:52:34 -0500, HarryisPaul wrote:

In article ,
says...

In article 12839972-8bed-4183-a3db-8908dfb6c5a1
@w9g2000prg.googlegroups.com, says...

On Feb 23, 4:31*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Here is what Wiki says about Gaddafi:
The 27-year-old Gaddafi, with a taste for safari suits and sunglasses,
then sought to become the new "Che Guevara of the age".[9] To
accomplish this Gaddafi turned Libya into a haven for anti-Western
radicals, where any group, supposedly, could receive weapons and
financial assistance, provided they claimed to be fighting imperialism.
[9]

I remember campus radicals expousing both Mao's "Little Red Book" and
Gadaffi's "Little Green Book" and making banners with the thoughts of
Gaddafi.
Of course, Gaddafi is best buds with Chavez, another darling of the
left.
Now, Libs try to rewrite their history of liking Gaddafi as he now
turns to mass murder. *If we did not have instant video of such, the
left would still be trying to deny it was happening just like they
tried to deny Stalin's or Mao's crimes.

Leftism inevitably leads to mass murder.

It was also stated in " Bowling For Columbine " that Gaddafi was an "
ex CIA Man" .

Well then, if Michal Moore said it.. It can be summarily dismissed

Hey, about that. I recall that when there was significant snow and cold
that most of the righties stated here and elsewhere that because it was
cold, that it was proof positive that global warming doesn't exist.
Well, in my neck of the woods, we've had record breaking highs, and no
significant rain. So, using the right's own analogy, that would mean
that there is proof positive that global warming DOESN'T exist, no?

Most 'righties' don't deny the occurrence of global warming, or at least some
form of climate change.

The big question has to do with the involvement of mankind in same, and whether
or not sending lots of money to Al Gore is the solution.

Most righties are too ignorant or too interested in themselves to have
to care what adverse climate change cause by humans is actually doing.

Gee, another blind statement with nothing to back it up. You are lying
and you know it. Most believe that the earth is warming, we just don't
agree with the solutions the bought and paid for are suggesting.. Big
difference with what you said.

In article ,
says...
Hey, about that. I recall that when there was significant snow and cold
that most of the righties stated here and elsewhere that because it was
cold, that it was proof positive that global warming doesn't exist.
Well, in my neck of the woods, we've had record breaking highs, and no
significant rain. So, using the right's own analogy, that would mean
that there is proof positive that global warming DOESN'T exist, no?

Most 'righties' don't deny the occurrence of global warming, or at least some
form of climate change.

The big question has to do with the involvement of mankind in same, and whether
or not sending lots of money to Al Gore is the solution.

Most righties are too ignorant or too interested in themselves to have
to care what adverse climate change cause by humans is actually doing.

Gee, another blind statement with nothing to back it up. You are lying
and you know it. Most believe that the earth is warming, we just don't
agree with the solutions the bought and paid for are suggesting.. Big
difference with what you said.



The problem is that the last time the Earth warmed up it went through a
severe cooling cycle. And, it has repeated the cycle many times over the
last many hundreds of thousands of years. What I haven't heard from
anyone is compelling peer reviewed evidence that this time is different
than anytime in the past. If you view the rise in temperature and CO2 it
is no different than the previous cycles.

And, what about the time that the entire Earth was covered in a 5 mile
thick sheet of ice?

On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:18:41 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...
Hey, about that. I recall that when there was significant snow and cold
that most of the righties stated here and elsewhere that because it was
cold, that it was proof positive that global warming doesn't exist.
Well, in my neck of the woods, we've had record breaking highs, and no
significant rain. So, using the right's own analogy, that would mean
that there is proof positive that global warming DOESN'T exist, no?

Most 'righties' don't deny the occurrence of global warming, or at least some
form of climate change.

The big question has to do with the involvement of mankind in same, and whether
or not sending lots of money to Al Gore is the solution.

Most righties are too ignorant or too interested in themselves to have
to care what adverse climate change cause by humans is actually doing.

Gee, another blind statement with nothing to back it up. You are lying
and you know it. Most believe that the earth is warming, we just don't
agree with the solutions the bought and paid for are suggesting.. Big
difference with what you said.



The problem is that the last time the Earth warmed up it went through a
severe cooling cycle. And, it has repeated the cycle many times over the
last many hundreds of thousands of years. What I haven't heard from
anyone is compelling peer reviewed evidence that this time is different
than anytime in the past. If you view the rise in temperature and CO2 it
is no different than the previous cycles.

And, what about the time that the entire Earth was covered in a 5 mile
thick sheet of ice?

The problem is that you're no scientist, and you're unwilling to
listen to them (unless they support your bizarre views).