On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:18:41 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...
Hey, about that. I recall that when there was significant snow and cold
that most of the righties stated here and elsewhere that because it was
cold, that it was proof positive that global warming doesn't exist.
Well, in my neck of the woods, we've had record breaking highs, and no
significant rain. So, using the right's own analogy, that would mean
that there is proof positive that global warming DOESN'T exist, no?

Most 'righties' don't deny the occurrence of global warming, or at least some
form of climate change.

The big question has to do with the involvement of mankind in same, and whether
or not sending lots of money to Al Gore is the solution.

Most righties are too ignorant or too interested in themselves to have
to care what adverse climate change cause by humans is actually doing.

Gee, another blind statement with nothing to back it up. You are lying
and you know it. Most believe that the earth is warming, we just don't
agree with the solutions the bought and paid for are suggesting.. Big
difference with what you said.



The problem is that the last time the Earth warmed up it went through a
severe cooling cycle. And, it has repeated the cycle many times over the
last many hundreds of thousands of years. What I haven't heard from
anyone is compelling peer reviewed evidence that this time is different
than anytime in the past. If you view the rise in temperature and CO2 it
is no different than the previous cycles.

And, what about the time that the entire Earth was covered in a 5 mile
thick sheet of ice?

The problem is that you're no scientist, and you're unwilling to
listen to them (unless they support your bizarre views).