Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,868
Default She who laughs last...

In article ,
says...

On 2/13/11 7:16 PM, BAR wrote:
In article4ZydnSScr7Eg7cXQnZ2dnUVZ_uKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/13/11 6:33 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In om,

says...

In ,
says...


If they stick to their original story, as I heard it, Breitbart will
be convicted of yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.... and his
right of free speech defense won't hold water....

All you need is someone with a conscious and the rest of them are up on
a threat of a perjury charge. How many of your co-workers are you
willing to become a convicted felon for.


Looks like Krause wss right about you all along.
Wasn't sure until now.

I made no statement for or against anyone. I seek only fairness from all
and fairness for all.


Bull****, with a capital B.


Please provide the quote where I pushed Brietbart?s side or Sherrod?s
side.

I mad a statement about how too many witnesses can cause problems with
trying to keep a story straight.




The original unedited video is available, and the "slightly edited to
change the meaning" edited video of Breitbart is available. If a jury
sees the tapes, it will see what Ms. Sherrod said and what Breitbart, et
al, changed the tape to make it appear she was making a racist remark.

I would guess Breitbart will offer a settlement. I hope the woman
doesn't take it.


Where is the original video?


  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,909
Default She who laughs last...

On 2/13/11 7:49 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On 2/13/11 7:16 PM, BAR wrote:
In article4ZydnSScr7Eg7cXQnZ2dnUVZ_uKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/13/11 6:33 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In om,

says...

In ,
says...


If they stick to their original story, as I heard it, Breitbart will
be convicted of yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.... and his
right of free speech defense won't hold water....

All you need is someone with a conscious and the rest of them are up on
a threat of a perjury charge. How many of your co-workers are you
willing to become a convicted felon for.


Looks like Krause wss right about you all along.
Wasn't sure until now.

I made no statement for or against anyone. I seek only fairness from all
and fairness for all.


Bull****, with a capital B.

Please provide the quote where I pushed Brietbart?s side or Sherrod?s
side.

I mad a statement about how too many witnesses can cause problems with
trying to keep a story straight.




The original unedited video is available, and the "slightly edited to
change the meaning" edited video of Breitbart is available. If a jury
sees the tapes, it will see what Ms. Sherrod said and what Breitbart, et
al, changed the tape to make it appear she was making a racist remark.

I would guess Breitbart will offer a settlement. I hope the woman
doesn't take it.


Where is the original video?



Under lock and key, one hopes. I've seen copies of both on various
sites. I'm sure a high school grad like you can find it, if you are that
interested.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,868
Default She who laughs last...

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

The original unedited video is available, and the "slightly edited to
change the meaning" edited video of Breitbart is available. If a jury
sees the tapes, it will see what Ms. Sherrod said and what Breitbart, et
al, changed the tape to make it appear she was making a racist remark.

I would guess Breitbart will offer a settlement. I hope the woman
doesn't take it.


Where is the original video?



Under lock and key, one hopes. I've seen copies of both on various
sites. I'm sure a high school grad like you can find it, if you are that
interested.



So it doesn?t exist.


  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,909
Default She who laughs last...

On 2/13/11 7:58 PM, BAR wrote:
In articleDuWdnbRBg84r4cXQnZ2dnUVZ_q6dnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

The original unedited video is available, and the "slightly edited to
change the meaning" edited video of Breitbart is available. If a jury
sees the tapes, it will see what Ms. Sherrod said and what Breitbart, et
al, changed the tape to make it appear she was making a racist remark.

I would guess Breitbart will offer a settlement. I hope the woman
doesn't take it.

Where is the original video?



Under lock and key, one hopes. I've seen copies of both on various
sites. I'm sure a high school grad like you can find it, if you are that
interested.



So it doesn?t exist.



You're still the dumb****.


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jps jps is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
Default She who laughs last...

On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:45:20 -0500, Harryk
wrote:

On 2/13/11 7:16 PM, BAR wrote:
In article4ZydnSScr7Eg7cXQnZ2dnUVZ_uKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/13/11 6:33 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In om,

says...

In ,
says...


If they stick to their original story, as I heard it, Breitbart will
be convicted of yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.... and his
right of free speech defense won't hold water....

All you need is someone with a conscious and the rest of them are up on
a threat of a perjury charge. How many of your co-workers are you
willing to become a convicted felon for.


Looks like Krause wss right about you all along.
Wasn't sure until now.

I made no statement for or against anyone. I seek only fairness from all
and fairness for all.


Bull****, with a capital B.


Please provide the quote where I pushed Brietbart?s side or Sherrod?s
side.

I mad a statement about how too many witnesses can cause problems with
trying to keep a story straight.




The original unedited video is available, and the "slightly edited to
change the meaning" edited video of Breitbart is available. If a jury
sees the tapes, it will see what Ms. Sherrod said and what Breitbart, et
al, changed the tape to make it appear she was making a racist remark.

I would guess Breitbart will offer a settlement. I hope the woman
doesn't take it.


She refused to go back to her old job after Obama's folks screwed up
with their knee jerk reaction. Seems she's a person of substance and
conviction.

I'm guessing she won't unless it's a settlement that's targeted at the
kind of smear tactics Breitbart employs.

  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,736
Default She who laughs last...

On Feb 13, 8:38*pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:45:20 -0500, Harryk
wrote:



On 2/13/11 7:16 PM, BAR wrote:
In article4ZydnSScr7Eg7cXQnZ2dnUVZ_uKdn...@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...


On 2/13/11 6:33 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...


In om,
says...


In ,
says...


If they stick to their original story, as I heard it, Breitbart will
be convicted of yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.... and his
right of free speech defense won't hold water....


All you need is someone with a conscious and the rest of them are up on
a threat of a perjury charge. How many of your co-workers are you
willing to become a convicted felon for.


Looks like Krause wss right about you all along.
Wasn't sure until now.


I made no statement for or against anyone. I seek only fairness from all
and fairness for all.


Bull****, with a capital B.


Please provide the quote where I pushed Brietbart?s side or Sherrod?s
side.


I mad a statement about how too many witnesses can cause problems with
trying to keep a story straight.


The original unedited video is available, and the "slightly edited to
change the meaning" edited video of Breitbart is available. If a jury
sees the tapes, it will see what Ms. Sherrod said and what Breitbart, et
al, changed the tape to make it appear she was making a racist remark.


I would guess Breitbart will offer a settlement. I hope the woman
doesn't take it.


She refused to go back to her old job after Obama's folks screwed up
with their knee jerk reaction. *Seems she's a person of substance and
conviction.


.. Unlike you, Krause, or D'Plume, She very well may have some
scruples
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
john behaves the potter to hers and weekly laughs Rich Chimpanzee ASA 0 April 22nd 05 02:00 PM
her book was think, dry, and laughs below the autumn Cypriene ASA 0 April 22nd 05 01:38 PM
roberta laughs the bush outside hers and weekly explains G. Jacobs ASA 0 April 22nd 05 12:51 PM
charlie's unit laughs in our can after we behave near it Horny Bitch ASA 0 April 22nd 05 12:25 PM
gilbert laughs the elbow above hers and surprisingly climbs H. Van Damm ASA 0 April 22nd 05 10:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017