Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/13/11 7:16 PM, BAR wrote:
In article4ZydnSScr7Eg7cXQnZ2dnUVZ_uKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... On 2/13/11 6:33 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... In om, says... In , says... If they stick to their original story, as I heard it, Breitbart will be convicted of yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.... and his right of free speech defense won't hold water.... All you need is someone with a conscious and the rest of them are up on a threat of a perjury charge. How many of your co-workers are you willing to become a convicted felon for. Looks like Krause wss right about you all along. Wasn't sure until now. I made no statement for or against anyone. I seek only fairness from all and fairness for all. Bull****, with a capital B. Please provide the quote where I pushed Brietbart?s side or Sherrod?s side. I mad a statement about how too many witnesses can cause problems with trying to keep a story straight. The original unedited video is available, and the "slightly edited to change the meaning" edited video of Breitbart is available. If a jury sees the tapes, it will see what Ms. Sherrod said and what Breitbart, et al, changed the tape to make it appear she was making a racist remark. I would guess Breitbart will offer a settlement. I hope the woman doesn't take it. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/13/11 7:49 PM, BAR wrote:
In , says... On 2/13/11 7:16 PM, BAR wrote: In article4ZydnSScr7Eg7cXQnZ2dnUVZ_uKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... On 2/13/11 6:33 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... In om, says... In , says... If they stick to their original story, as I heard it, Breitbart will be convicted of yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.... and his right of free speech defense won't hold water.... All you need is someone with a conscious and the rest of them are up on a threat of a perjury charge. How many of your co-workers are you willing to become a convicted felon for. Looks like Krause wss right about you all along. Wasn't sure until now. I made no statement for or against anyone. I seek only fairness from all and fairness for all. Bull****, with a capital B. Please provide the quote where I pushed Brietbart?s side or Sherrod?s side. I mad a statement about how too many witnesses can cause problems with trying to keep a story straight. The original unedited video is available, and the "slightly edited to change the meaning" edited video of Breitbart is available. If a jury sees the tapes, it will see what Ms. Sherrod said and what Breitbart, et al, changed the tape to make it appear she was making a racist remark. I would guess Breitbart will offer a settlement. I hope the woman doesn't take it. Where is the original video? Under lock and key, one hopes. I've seen copies of both on various sites. I'm sure a high school grad like you can find it, if you are that interested. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says... The original unedited video is available, and the "slightly edited to change the meaning" edited video of Breitbart is available. If a jury sees the tapes, it will see what Ms. Sherrod said and what Breitbart, et al, changed the tape to make it appear she was making a racist remark. I would guess Breitbart will offer a settlement. I hope the woman doesn't take it. Where is the original video? Under lock and key, one hopes. I've seen copies of both on various sites. I'm sure a high school grad like you can find it, if you are that interested. So it doesn?t exist. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/13/11 7:58 PM, BAR wrote:
In articleDuWdnbRBg84r4cXQnZ2dnUVZ_q6dnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... The original unedited video is available, and the "slightly edited to change the meaning" edited video of Breitbart is available. If a jury sees the tapes, it will see what Ms. Sherrod said and what Breitbart, et al, changed the tape to make it appear she was making a racist remark. I would guess Breitbart will offer a settlement. I hope the woman doesn't take it. Where is the original video? Under lock and key, one hopes. I've seen copies of both on various sites. I'm sure a high school grad like you can find it, if you are that interested. So it doesn?t exist. You're still the dumb****. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:45:20 -0500, Harryk
wrote: On 2/13/11 7:16 PM, BAR wrote: In article4ZydnSScr7Eg7cXQnZ2dnUVZ_uKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... On 2/13/11 6:33 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... In om, says... In , says... If they stick to their original story, as I heard it, Breitbart will be convicted of yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.... and his right of free speech defense won't hold water.... All you need is someone with a conscious and the rest of them are up on a threat of a perjury charge. How many of your co-workers are you willing to become a convicted felon for. Looks like Krause wss right about you all along. Wasn't sure until now. I made no statement for or against anyone. I seek only fairness from all and fairness for all. Bull****, with a capital B. Please provide the quote where I pushed Brietbart?s side or Sherrod?s side. I mad a statement about how too many witnesses can cause problems with trying to keep a story straight. The original unedited video is available, and the "slightly edited to change the meaning" edited video of Breitbart is available. If a jury sees the tapes, it will see what Ms. Sherrod said and what Breitbart, et al, changed the tape to make it appear she was making a racist remark. I would guess Breitbart will offer a settlement. I hope the woman doesn't take it. She refused to go back to her old job after Obama's folks screwed up with their knee jerk reaction. Seems she's a person of substance and conviction. I'm guessing she won't unless it's a settlement that's targeted at the kind of smear tactics Breitbart employs. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 13, 8:38*pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:45:20 -0500, Harryk wrote: On 2/13/11 7:16 PM, BAR wrote: In article4ZydnSScr7Eg7cXQnZ2dnUVZ_uKdn...@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... On 2/13/11 6:33 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... In om, says... In , says... If they stick to their original story, as I heard it, Breitbart will be convicted of yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.... and his right of free speech defense won't hold water.... All you need is someone with a conscious and the rest of them are up on a threat of a perjury charge. How many of your co-workers are you willing to become a convicted felon for. Looks like Krause wss right about you all along. Wasn't sure until now. I made no statement for or against anyone. I seek only fairness from all and fairness for all. Bull****, with a capital B. Please provide the quote where I pushed Brietbart?s side or Sherrod?s side. I mad a statement about how too many witnesses can cause problems with trying to keep a story straight. The original unedited video is available, and the "slightly edited to change the meaning" edited video of Breitbart is available. If a jury sees the tapes, it will see what Ms. Sherrod said and what Breitbart, et al, changed the tape to make it appear she was making a racist remark. I would guess Breitbart will offer a settlement. I hope the woman doesn't take it. She refused to go back to her old job after Obama's folks screwed up with their knee jerk reaction. *Seems she's a person of substance and conviction. .. Unlike you, Krause, or D'Plume, She very well may have some scruples |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
john behaves the potter to hers and weekly laughs | ASA | |||
her book was think, dry, and laughs below the autumn | ASA | |||
roberta laughs the bush outside hers and weekly explains | ASA | |||
charlie's unit laughs in our can after we behave near it | ASA | |||
gilbert laughs the elbow above hers and surprisingly climbs | ASA |