Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/13/11 7:16 PM, BAR wrote:
In article4ZydnSScr7Eg7cXQnZ2dnUVZ_uKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... On 2/13/11 6:33 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... In om, says... In , says... If they stick to their original story, as I heard it, Breitbart will be convicted of yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.... and his right of free speech defense won't hold water.... All you need is someone with a conscious and the rest of them are up on a threat of a perjury charge. How many of your co-workers are you willing to become a convicted felon for. Looks like Krause wss right about you all along. Wasn't sure until now. I made no statement for or against anyone. I seek only fairness from all and fairness for all. Bull****, with a capital B. Please provide the quote where I pushed Brietbart?s side or Sherrod?s side. I mad a statement about how too many witnesses can cause problems with trying to keep a story straight. The original unedited video is available, and the "slightly edited to change the meaning" edited video of Breitbart is available. If a jury sees the tapes, it will see what Ms. Sherrod said and what Breitbart, et al, changed the tape to make it appear she was making a racist remark. I would guess Breitbart will offer a settlement. I hope the woman doesn't take it. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|