About Us

[email protected]

On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 01:19:07 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:37:52 -0800, wrote:

Iraq and Iran have never been a danger to the US but neither was
Afghanistan.
We invaded and occupied a country to get one guy, who isn't there. Is
that dumber than invading for WMD that wasn't there?

?? We invaded Afg. to 1) get Bin Laden (Bush gave up on that one) and
2) to stop the safe harbor the Taliban were giving him. When we
invaded, Bin Laden was there. Bush let him get away.

It is far from certain that there was any way to get Bin Laden and
when it was clear he got away, why did we keep prosecuting the war?

You're right. Bush lied about the effort, which was in a large measure
how easy or difficult it was. We kept going to try and ensure the
Taliban didn't return. Actually, Bush did little. We had to wait for
Obama.

Obams basically threw more troops into Afghanistan after saying he
would wind down the war. I really do not see much progress tho.
We are killing more people but I am not sure we are making a dent in
the terrorists. We are making new ones faster than we can kill them.

So, he shouldn't have listened to his generals?

You make it sound like Bin Laden is some kind of criminal genius who
can't be replaced. The fact is he was not even the planner of 9-11.
(that guy is in Gitmo) OBL just provided some of the money. As soon as
we cut him off from the money he was "contained".

He was certainly in the loop on it.

There may be some revenge value to going after him but if that is a
justification, then getting Saddam should have been OK.

Revenge had nothing to do with it. Justice did. Saddam didn't attack
us or make any plans to attack us.

The revenge would be for putting a contract out on GHWB.

And, this is a justification for 1000s of dead US soldiers?

In 50 years Iraq may be seen as the good war, if they actually come
out of it with a democracy. I doubt there will be any good coming out
of the Afghanistan war. There is absolutely ZERO chance that **** hole
will ever be a democracy.

Right. Because Iraq was Bush's war, but Afg. is Obamas? There is a
decent chance that they won't devolve back into Taliban control...

There is a fair to middling chance that Iraq might evolve into a
somewhat democratic government that successfully participates in the
global economy. Afghanistan will still be a **** hole that will remain
a tribal culture and the only participation in the world economy will
be the powerful will exploit the weak to produce a few natural
resources and a lot of smack.

According the you.... expert on all things, esp. those in the middle
east.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Forced Back Into Sailing in Toronto	BeeRich	Cruising	17	April 10th 08 05:45 PM
When USA Forced Injections Regimes Comes, Run Away From Them	Kurt Brown	General	0	August 6th 07 08:33 PM
FDR: Internment Camps and Forced Labor	Bob Crantz	ASA	6	December 12th 05 08:57 PM
GM Forced to Lay Off Thousands	Skipper	General	98	November 25th 05 11:28 PM

Menu

About Us