On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:57:28 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:27:09 -0800, wrote:

Yeah, just what we need... another for-profit company (like
Haliburton) looking out for our "best interest."

You are on another one of your anti-capitalism rants again. Did you
get laid off from a large corporation at the same time as Harry?

Tell you what. Why don't you organize a self-sustaining not for profit
group that provides all of the goods and services that everyone needs.
If your prices are competetive and you provide a good customer
experience, the world will beat a path to your door, and the evil "for
profit corporations" will be driven out of business. What's so
difficult about that? By the way, please pay your employees well,
provide them with good benefits, and make sure all of your suppliers
are in the US.

You whackos can't see the case for balance. It's either
no-holds-barred capitalism with all the ugly implications, or it's
socialism and the nanny state.

Your arguments are intellectually dishonest, as if there's no place in
the middle.

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:54:33 -0800, jps wrote:

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:57:28 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:27:09 -0800, wrote:

Yeah, just what we need... another for-profit company (like
Haliburton) looking out for our "best interest."

You are on another one of your anti-capitalism rants again. Did you
get laid off from a large corporation at the same time as Harry?

Tell you what. Why don't you organize a self-sustaining not for profit
group that provides all of the goods and services that everyone needs.
If your prices are competetive and you provide a good customer
experience, the world will beat a path to your door, and the evil "for
profit corporations" will be driven out of business. What's so
difficult about that? By the way, please pay your employees well,
provide them with good benefits, and make sure all of your suppliers
are in the US.

You whackos can't see the case for balance. It's either
no-holds-barred capitalism with all the ugly implications, or it's
socialism and the nanny state.

Your arguments are intellectually dishonest, as if there's no place in
the middle.

Exactly. With extremists there's no middle ground.

On Jan 17, 8:59*pm, wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:54:33 -0800, jps wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:57:28 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:27:09 -0800, wrote:

Yeah, just what we need... another for-profit company (like
Haliburton) looking out for our "best interest."

You are on another one of your anti-capitalism rants again. *Did you
get laid off from a large corporation at the same time as Harry?

Tell you what. Why don't you organize a self-sustaining not for profit
group that provides all of the goods and services that everyone needs.
If your prices are competetive and you provide a good customer
experience, the world will beat a path to your door, and the evil "for
profit corporations" will be driven out of business. *What's so
difficult about that? *By the way, please pay your employees well,
provide them with good benefits, and make sure all of your suppliers
are in the US.

You whackos can't see the case for balance. *It's either
no-holds-barred capitalism with all the ugly implications, or it's
socialism and the nanny state.

Your arguments are intellectually dishonest, as if there's no place in
the middle.

Exactly. With extremists there's no middle ground.

You prove that here on a seemingly regular basis.

On Jan 17, 8:54*pm, jps wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:57:28 -0500, Wayne.B



wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:27:09 -0800, wrote:

Yeah, just what we need... another for-profit company (like
Haliburton) looking out for our "best interest."

You are on another one of your anti-capitalism rants again. *Did you
get laid off from a large corporation at the same time as Harry?

Tell you what. Why don't you organize a self-sustaining not for profit
group that provides all of the goods and services that everyone needs.
If your prices are competetive and you provide a good customer
experience, the world will beat a path to your door, and the evil "for
profit corporations" will be driven out of business. *What's so
difficult about that? *By the way, please pay your employees well,
provide them with good benefits, and make sure all of your suppliers
are in the US.

You whackos can't see the case for balance. *It's either
no-holds-barred capitalism with all the ugly implications, or it's
socialism and the nanny state.

Your arguments are intellectually dishonest, as if there's no place in
the middle.

For once, it is good to see you spelled "intellectually" correctly.