"NOYB" wrote in message
.. .
Since when did combat in Vietnam become a litmus test for a President?
Hell, they ran from that issue in 1992 and 1996...and now it's their
battle
cry?

No, Vietnam service is still not a litmus test. Your dittohead friend,
Bert, says a leader needs to be out front leading. I agree, and I'm saying
Wesley Clark has those leadership skills.

By the way, it's Wesley, not Weaslyl. Perhaps you should enable your
spell-checker.

"Snafu" wrote in message
ink.net...

"NOYB" wrote in message
.. .
Since when did combat in Vietnam become a litmus test for a President?
Hell, they ran from that issue in 1992 and 1996...and now it's their
battle
cry?

No, Vietnam service is still not a litmus test. Your dittohead friend,
Bert, says a leader needs to be out front leading. I agree, and I'm
saying
Wesley Clark has those leadership skills.

By the way, it's Wesley, not Weaslyl. Perhaps you should enable your
spell-checker.

Actually, the typo was the last "l" that I inadvertently put at the end of
Weasly...a play on the name Wesley...and a more appropriate name for such a
weasel.

"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...

Actually, the typo was the last "l" that I inadvertently put at the end of
Weasly...a play on the name Wesley...and a more appropriate name for such
a
weasel.

Let's see, you support a guy who needlessly puts our kids at risk in a
ficticious war but you're against a military man who's commited to using
military force as a means of last resort.

Who's a flip flopping weasel in the equation?

"jps" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...

Actually, the typo was the last "l" that I inadvertently put at the end
of
Weasly...a play on the name Wesley...and a more appropriate name for
such
a
weasel.

Let's see, you support a guy who needlessly puts our kids at risk in a
ficticious war but you're against a military man who's commited to using
military force as a means of last resort.

Who's a flip flopping weasel in the equation?


The guy that said last Thursday "I probably would have voted for the
resolution", and then stated last Friday "I would not have voted for the
resolution". I've heard of problems with short-term memory and with people
having "senior moments" before...but in 24 hours?

"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...

The guy that said last Thursday "I probably would have voted for the
resolution", and then stated last Friday "I would not have voted for the
resolution". I've heard of problems with short-term memory and with
people
having "senior moments" before...but in 24 hours?

You and many of the simpleton media. He didn't flip flop, he clarified his
point of view.

He said that he would've voted for the resolution in order to give Bush the
leverage to negotiate. That's a big difference from "voting for the war" as
it was characterized in the media.

He got a quick lesson in chosing his words carefully. Hopefully, he
understands and learns from this experience.

I wish Bush got this sort of treatment from the "liberal press."