OT--Weaslyl watch begins
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...

The guy that said last Thursday "I probably would have voted for the
resolution", and then stated last Friday "I would not have voted for the
resolution". I've heard of problems with short-term memory and with
people
having "senior moments" before...but in 24 hours?

You and many of the simpleton media. He didn't flip flop, he clarified his
point of view.

He said that he would've voted for the resolution in order to give Bush the
leverage to negotiate. That's a big difference from "voting for the war" as
it was characterized in the media.

He got a quick lesson in chosing his words carefully. Hopefully, he
understands and learns from this experience.

I wish Bush got this sort of treatment from the "liberal press."

OT--Weaslyl watch begins
 

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
nk.net...

Maybe those purple hearts were from getting shot by his own charges?

Yeah, that's likely. Get that from Rush or just employing his tactics?

According to reports, he was not an admired general in the Losovo campaign
as well as almost starting WW III with the Russians over an airport.
Bill

He wasn't appreciated because he leapfrogged people in a system that, like
the Unions you dittoheads love to hate, often uses seniority in promotions.

He was promoted by the Generals who recognized his brilliance. There's no
substance to the WWIII comments. It's pure bluster since what he suggested
was never carried out. No one can predict the outcomes of things that don't
happen, unless of course, it's Republicans talking about how Al Gore
would've blown up the world by now.

Further, Clark recommended ground troops instead of bombing Kosovo from
15,000 ft. because he knew there'd be civiilian casualties. They didn't
take his advice and many civilians lost their lives.

OT--Weaslyl watch begins
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
nk.net...

Maybe those purple hearts were from getting shot by his own charges?

Yeah, that's likely. Get that from Rush or just employing his tactics?

According to reports, he was not an admired general in the Losovo
campaign
as well as almost starting WW III with the Russians over an airport.
Bill

He wasn't appreciated because he leapfrogged people in a system that, like
the Unions you dittoheads love to hate, often uses seniority in
promotions.

He was promoted by the Generals who recognized his brilliance. There's no
substance to the WWIII comments. It's pure bluster since what he
suggested
was never carried out. No one can predict the outcomes of things that
don't
happen, unless of course, it's Republicans talking about how Al Gore
would've blown up the world by now.

Further, Clark recommended ground troops instead of bombing Kosovo from
15,000 ft. because he knew there'd be civiilian casualties. They didn't
take his advice and many civilians lost their lives.



Generals become generals because they are good at politics! Especially in
peacetime. Sure there were civilian casualties. Always are in wars and
police actions. Questions: Why did you support going in to Kosovo? Why is
that a good war, and Iraq a bad war? Political party of the President who
issued the orders?