In article ,
says...

On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote:
HarryK wrote:
On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:





On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he

http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...


Nor he

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...


Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little
in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in
the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she
was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can
be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can*
believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in
your younger years.

You crack me up. :-


Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors.
She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a
master's degree.
She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from
Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU.

She worked several years for a top management consulting organization
and for a venture capital group.

Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her
say she is well-mannered.

There is no record of public intoxication for her.

Nice try.

How are your kids doing?

Any of them at Oxford?
Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who
posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA.


Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as
many as "the contender."

Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of
snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you
make one, I award you a "Snotty."

thank you for your participation.




"Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself.


Another Snotty for Ziggy.

I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice.

Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the
negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a
couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i
started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side.
LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other
posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties."

My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this
newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see.

Another Snotty for Harry.

In article ,
says...

On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, Ziggy® wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote:
HarryK wrote:
On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:





On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he

http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...


Nor he

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...


Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little
in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in
the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she
was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can
be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can*
believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in
your younger years.

You crack me up. :-


Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors.
She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a
master's degree.
She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from
Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU.

She worked several years for a top management consulting organization
and for a venture capital group.

Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her
say she is well-mannered.

There is no record of public intoxication for her.

Nice try.

How are your kids doing?

Any of them at Oxford?
Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who
posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA.


Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as
many as "the contender."

Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of
snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you
make one, I award you a "Snotty."

thank you for your participation.




"Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself.


Another Snotty for Ziggy.

I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice.

Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the
negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a
couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i
started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side.
LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other
posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties."

My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this
newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see.




Ah. A window into the mind of a student of the liberal arts. Not much to see, I'm afraid



Another Snotty for you for your personal insult.

The point is that it is posters on your side of the fence who post most
of the personal insults here. Every Snotty you earn helps prove my point.

Thank you and have an insult-free day.

Do you mean like saying things about someone's children?

On 12/18/10 9:29 AM, Harry Don wrote:
In ,
says...

On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote:
HarryK wrote:
On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:





On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he

http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...


Nor he

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...


Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little
in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in
the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she
was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can
be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can*
believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in
your younger years.

You crack me up. :-


Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors.
She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a
master's degree.
She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from
Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU.

She worked several years for a top management consulting organization
and for a venture capital group.

Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her
say she is well-mannered.

There is no record of public intoxication for her.

Nice try.

How are your kids doing?

Any of them at Oxford?
Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who
posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA.


Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as
many as "the contender."

Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of
snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you
make one, I award you a "Snotty."

thank you for your participation.




"Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself.


Another Snotty for Ziggy.

I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice.

Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the
negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a
couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i
started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side.
LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other
posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties."

My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this
newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see.

Another Snotty for Harry.

When will you right wingers learn that I play by my rules, I don't play
by your rules.

In article ,
says...

On 12/18/10 9:02 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, Ziggy® wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote:
HarryK wrote:
On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:





On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he

http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...


Nor he

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...


Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little
in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in
the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she
was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can
be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can*
believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in
your younger years.

You crack me up. :-


Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors.
She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a
master's degree.
She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from
Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU.

She worked several years for a top management consulting organization
and for a venture capital group.

Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her
say she is well-mannered.

There is no record of public intoxication for her.

Nice try.

How are your kids doing?

Any of them at Oxford?
Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who
posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA.


Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as
many as "the contender."

Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of
snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you
make one, I award you a "Snotty."

thank you for your participation.




"Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself.


Another Snotty for Ziggy.

I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice.

Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the
negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a
couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i
started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side.
LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other
posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties."

My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this
newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see.




Ah. A window into the mind of a student of the liberal arts. Not much to see, I'm afraid



Another Snotty for you for your personal insult.

The point is that it is posters on your side of the fence who post most
of the personal insults here. Every Snotty you earn helps prove my point.

Thank you and have an insult-free day.

Doesn't prove anything... The proof is in the posts of the last month
and we have all been here to see it despite your childish game...



As I stated, I started to keep count yesterday. And your insult earns
you another...Snotty.

Hey, if you stop insulting other posters, you'll not earn another Snotty.

Easy, eh?

Another Snotty for Harry. Easy, eh?

In article ,
says...

"Ziggy®" wrote in message
...
"HarryK" wrote in message
...
On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote:
HarryK wrote:
On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:





On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am
wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he

http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...


Nor he

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...


Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little
in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in
the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she
was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes
really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the
president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can
be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can*
believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in
your younger years.

You crack me up. :-


Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors.
She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a
master's degree.
She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from
Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU.

She worked several years for a top management consulting organization
and for a venture capital group.

Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her
say she is well-mannered.

There is no record of public intoxication for her.

Nice try.

How are your kids doing?

Any of them at Oxford?
Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who
posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA.


Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as
many as "the contender."

Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of
snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you
make one, I award you a "Snotty."

thank you for your participation.




"Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your
side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're
going to have to award them yourself.

--
Ziggy®

I'm thinking community awards for trying to cleanup America.

Another Snotty for Don.

On 12/18/10 9:32 AM, Harry Don wrote:
In ,
says...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote:
HarryK wrote:
On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:





On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am
wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he

http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...


Nor he

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...


Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little
in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in
the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she
was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes
really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the
president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can
be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can*
believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in
your younger years.

You crack me up. :-


Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors.
She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a
master's degree.
She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from
Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU.

She worked several years for a top management consulting organization
and for a venture capital group.

Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her
say she is well-mannered.

There is no record of public intoxication for her.

Nice try.

How are your kids doing?

Any of them at Oxford?
Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who
posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA.


Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as
many as "the contender."

Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of
snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you
make one, I award you a "Snotty."

thank you for your participation.




"Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your
side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're
going to have to award them yourself.

--
Ziggy®

I'm thinking community awards for trying to cleanup America.

Another Snotty for Don.


Sorry, the game is over. But you earned a few with your other persona here.

Ta-ta.

"Harry Don" wrote in message ...
In article , says...

"HarryK" wrote in message ...
On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829
@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote:
In article ,
says...





On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
payer33859
@mypacks.net says...

On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am
wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he


http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...


Nor he


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...


Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a
little in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like,
"this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of
the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing
up in the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked
when she was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing
time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're
slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated,
attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the
president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't
do it...

What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on
to it,
did they?

They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the
name calling and childish insults again.

Just like you, Ingersoll.....

Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really
don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I
fight back...

--

You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again?


The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's
snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a
bunch of Snotties.



I ask you, is that fair play?

Harry has done some childish things here over the years but this takes
the cake!

Big waste of bandwidth too.

--
Ziggy®

"Harry Don" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"Harry Don" wrote in message
...
In article ,

says...

In article ,
says...

On 12/17/10 3:13 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,

says...

On 12/17/10 3:08 PM, BAR wrote:


How are your kids doing?

Mine are fine. When was the last time yours talked to you.

Last Sunday. And probably again this Sunday. Not close by.

Is that what the court order allows?



What court order might that be, s.f.b.?

How many are there?

Harry doesn't have kids. If he did, he'd know that to say things about
someone's kids is the lowest of the low.

Why bring Kruger up again... we try to ignore him.

Don, I'll bet my three year old niece could read the sentence I wrote
and know that it's about Harry. How did you come to the conclusion it
was about "Kruger"?

In the past Kruger has made more disparaging remarks about family members
that any other two posters combined.
Try to pay attention... you'd be surprised at what you can learn.

In article ,
says...

On 12/18/10 9:26 AM, Harry Don wrote:
In , says...

wrote in message ...
On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"I am wrote in message
...
In articleb0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829
@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry wrote:
In ,
says...





On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
payer33859
@mypacks.net says...

On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack."
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am
wrote:
In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e-
,
says...

Yuo didn't make it he


http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i...


Nor he


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_...


Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume

Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a
little in my
mouth...

I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like,
"this
isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?!

That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of
the
captions:

"Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing
up in the
limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked
when she was
younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days."

Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing
time. :-

Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be
replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're
slimes really
hit a low mark.

Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta.

So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys?

Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated,
attractive,
well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the
president
who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the
influence
of drugs.

Of course, we liberals prefer smart women.

You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't
do it...

What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on
to it,
did they?

They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the
name calling and childish insults again.

Just like you, Ingersoll.....

Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really
don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I
fight back...

--

You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again?


The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's
snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a
bunch of Snotties.



I ask you, is that fair play?

Harry has done some childish things here over the years but this takes
the cake!

One Snotty for the insult to me and another Snotty for insulting cakes.

Spoofer alert! I always insult those that I don't agree with.

On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:59:55 -0800, "Califbill"
wrote:


Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors.
She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a
master's degree.
She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from
Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU.

She worked several years for a top management consulting organization
and for a venture capital group.

Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say
she is well-mannered.

There is no record of public intoxication for her.

Nice try.

How are your kids doing?

Any of them at Oxford?


Reply:
You do not think she got grade inflation by being the daughter of a
President of the USA? Lots of records of her drunk as a skunk while at
Oxford.

Let me get this straight... you're trying to compare Bush's daughters'
academic record to Chelsea Clinton? She's an investment banker. What
are they doing?

Show the records... ones that can actually be substantiated.