|
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:22 AM, YukonBound wrote:
"Ziggy®" wrote in message ... "HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. -- Ziggy® I'm thinking community awards for trying to cleanup America. Another Snotty for Canada's Snarky Contributor. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:26 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of Snotties. Don it is important to realize that when I make up the rules to my new game, you need to follow them. I have been ignoring your snotty comments, but everyone else realizes that my awards are only awarded to those I want to insult. Reread my rules sent via email. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:29 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:22 AM, YukonBound wrote: "Ziggy®" wrote in message ... "HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. -- Ziggy® I'm thinking community awards for trying to cleanup America. Another Snotty for Canada's Snarky Contributor. And yet another Snotty for the ID Spoofer. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
"HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of Snotties. Only trouble is... these posters are proud of their behaviour. They'll be competing with snotty remarks just to see who comes out on top. It's what they do. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:32 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:26 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of Snotties. Don it is important to realize that when I make up the rules to my new game, you need to follow them. I have been ignoring your snotty comments, but everyone else realizes that my awards are only awarded to those I want to insult. Reread my rules sent via email. Another Snotty for the ID Spoofer... |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:45 AM, YukonBound wrote:
"HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of Snotties. Only trouble is... these posters are proud of their behaviour. They'll be competing with snotty remarks just to see who comes out on top. It's what they do. Another Snotty to my favorite Snarky. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:45 AM, YukonBound wrote:
"HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of Snotties. Only trouble is... these posters are proud of their behaviour. They'll be competing with snotty remarks just to see who comes out on top. It's what they do. I can't argue against what you are saying there. But there's no reason to play their game. If all they can do is insult other posters, then that will be very obvious. We should refrain from playing along with that. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:46 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:45 AM, YukonBound wrote: "HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of Snotties. Only trouble is... these posters are proud of their behaviour. They'll be competing with snotty remarks just to see who comes out on top. It's what they do. Another Snotty to my favorite Snarky. The ID spoofer earns another snotty...13 so far today. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:53 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:45 AM, YukonBound wrote: "HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of Snotties. Only trouble is... these posters are proud of their behaviour. They'll be competing with snotty remarks just to see who comes out on top. It's what they do. I can't argue against what you are saying there. But there's no reason to play their game. If all they can do is insult other posters, then that will be very obvious. We should refrain from playing along with that. PS - I take back all of the Snotty's I award you, you were screwing up my statistics. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:55 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:53 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:45 AM, YukonBound wrote: "HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of Snotties. Only trouble is... these posters are proud of their behaviour. They'll be competing with snotty remarks just to see who comes out on top. It's what they do. I can't argue against what you are saying there. But there's no reason to play their game. If all they can do is insult other posters, then that will be very obvious. We should refrain from playing along with that. PS - I take back all of the Snotty's I award you, you were screwing up my statistics. Another Snotty to the Spoofer. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:54 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:46 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:45 AM, YukonBound wrote: "HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of Snotties. Only trouble is... these posters are proud of their behaviour. They'll be competing with snotty remarks just to see who comes out on top. It's what they do. Another Snotty to my favorite Snarky. The ID spoofer earns another snotty...13 so far today. This just earned the ID spoofer another snotty. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:55 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:53 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:45 AM, YukonBound wrote: "HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of Snotties. Only trouble is... these posters are proud of their behaviour. They'll be competing with snotty remarks just to see who comes out on top. It's what they do. I can't argue against what you are saying there. But there's no reason to play their game. If all they can do is insult other posters, then that will be very obvious. We should refrain from playing along with that. PS - I take back all of the Snotty's I award you, you were screwing up my statistics. Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:00 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:55 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:53 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:45 AM, YukonBound wrote: "HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of Snotties. Only trouble is... these posters are proud of their behaviour. They'll be competing with snotty remarks just to see who comes out on top. It's what they do. I can't argue against what you are saying there. But there's no reason to play their game. If all they can do is insult other posters, then that will be very obvious. We should refrain from playing along with that. PS - I take back all of the Snotty's I award you, you were screwing up my statistics. Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/453...ke-in-my-mouth |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:57 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:54 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:46 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:45 AM, YukonBound wrote: "HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of Snotties. Only trouble is... these posters are proud of their behaviour. They'll be competing with snotty remarks just to see who comes out on top. It's what they do. Another Snotty to my favorite Snarky. The ID spoofer earns another snotty...13 so far today. This just earned the ID spoofer another snotty. Another Snotty for the ID Spoofer. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:11 AM, Ziggy® wrote:
wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:15 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. Another Snotty for Ziggy. I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice. Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side. LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties." My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see. Ah. A window into the mind of a student of the liberal arts. Not much to see, I'm afraid Another Snotty for you for your personal insult. The point is that it is posters on your side of the fence who post most of the personal insults here. Every Snotty you earn helps prove my point. Thank you and have an insult-free day. And I would like to highlight that no one could ever consider my "Snottys" to be considered an insult. They are my way of improving the tone of rec.boats. I have been an inspiration to rec.boaters for over 15 yrs. and my "Snottys" are just another one of my imaginative innovations for my fans. Actually, the snottys are in and of themselves, snotty NO they are not. Here is another Snotty for you. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 8:57 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On 12/17/10 11:39 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In article89a68f81-960e-4c0a-a839-6a4a1e3979f5 @f8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 3:52 pm, I am wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 3:13 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 2:50 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. So she's an accomplished.... student. Bush has a degree from Yale and an MBA from Harvard. So? She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. In cushy jobs offered in exchange for political gains, right? Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. You know no one that "knows" her. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Doesn't mean she's never been intoxicated or done drugs. Nice try. How are your kids doing? You won't even post a picture of the supposed new boat. Why would I tell you anything about a child of mine? Any why would you try to drag my family into this, you lying sack of ****? Paul will be very upset with you. I don't recall your ever mentioning you had children. I figured if you did, they were incarcerated. I asked about your kids because you were knocking someone else's kids. And all I did was ask how they were doing. No boat pictures here, not while it is a pigpen and playpen for right-wing morons. So sorry. Seems you are just as happy wallowing in the mud with your so called enemies... I knew you couldn't do it.. -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - Pain is temporary, Glory is forever! Neither could you, seeing your most recent **** post. What, I still haven't resorted to name calling or attacking other posters here... You lie... You have earned five Snotties since 4:45 pm on 12/17, and therefore you are making snotty comments about other posters here. It's ok, each and every snotty represents a response to one of your trolls, and the troll that folllows that response. So for each and every "snotty" there are two "lobsta' boats"... Sorry, it isn't a "troll" to point out that someone is making a snotty comment about another poster. And you just earned another Snotty. The other day, you denied your side was the most disruptive here. The Snotty Awards are a way to call you out on that. You're wrong. Your side is the most disruptive. So far today, about 30 insults of other posters have been put up by your side. 30. And it is only 9 am. I have not insulted a person here since yesterday afternoon. I have merely pointed out the right-wing insulters. If you don't insult other posters here or don't incite others to do so, you don't earn Snotty Awards. You are directly encouraging bad behavior here. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:13 AM, Ziggy® wrote:
wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:06 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 7:55 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 3:59 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 3:08 PM, BAR wrote: I'll bet you are jealous. You couldn't get near an ivy league school nor would England let you anywhere near Oxford or Cambridge. Another of your fantasies, eh? How the hell would you know my college capabilities? After all, it's not as if you succeeded in pursuing a college degree. You didn't have the intellectual wherewithal to even complete a course of study at Montgomery College. Did you even graduate from high school? Maybe, maybe not. But, I still make more money than you and that is what ****es you off to no end. Oh no, not that piece of delusional bull**** again. What's the going rate for a go-fer like you these days? I told you, about a buck and a half. Not bad for a guy that you allege didn't graduate from high school. A buck-and-a-half does not put you in the position you think you are, vis-a-vis my annual earnings. Sorry. I have to be fair and give myself a Snotty for this post. Sorry. Another Snotty for the ID Spoofer. And there was nothing snotty about my comment. Sorry. REALLY? NO there wasn't. Here is another snotty for you. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:07 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 8:57 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 11:39 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In article89a68f81-960e-4c0a-a839-6a4a1e3979f5 @f8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 3:52 pm, I am wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 3:13 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 2:50 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. So she's an accomplished.... student. Bush has a degree from Yale and an MBA from Harvard. So? She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. In cushy jobs offered in exchange for political gains, right? Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. You know no one that "knows" her. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Doesn't mean she's never been intoxicated or done drugs. Nice try. How are your kids doing? You won't even post a picture of the supposed new boat. Why would I tell you anything about a child of mine? Any why would you try to drag my family into this, you lying sack of ****? Paul will be very upset with you. I don't recall your ever mentioning you had children. I figured if you did, they were incarcerated. I asked about your kids because you were knocking someone else's kids. And all I did was ask how they were doing. No boat pictures here, not while it is a pigpen and playpen for right-wing morons. So sorry. Seems you are just as happy wallowing in the mud with your so called enemies... I knew you couldn't do it.. -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - Pain is temporary, Glory is forever! Neither could you, seeing your most recent **** post. What, I still haven't resorted to name calling or attacking other posters here... You lie... You have earned five Snotties since 4:45 pm on 12/17, and therefore you are making snotty comments about other posters here. It's ok, each and every snotty represents a response to one of your trolls, and the troll that folllows that response. So for each and every "snotty" there are two "lobsta' boats"... Sorry, it isn't a "troll" to point out that someone is making a snotty comment about another poster. And you just earned another Snotty. The other day, you denied your side was the most disruptive here. The Snotty Awards are a way to call you out on that. You're wrong. Your side is the most disruptive. So far today, about 30 insults of other posters have been put up by your side. 30. And it is only 9 am. I have not insulted a person here since yesterday afternoon. I have merely pointed out the right-wing insulters. If you don't insult other posters here or don't incite others to do so, you don't earn Snotty Awards. You are directly encouraging bad behavior here. PS - one more rule, if you say something I don't like, you are right wing. If you were not right wing, you would like me. The only reason people don't like me is because they are right wing insulter s. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:16 AM, Ziggy® wrote:
wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote: "I am wrote in message ... In articleb0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of Snotties. I ask you, is that fair play? Here take your Snotty and back off |
Off T: She didn't make the list
"HarryK" wrote in message ...
On 12/18/10 8:15 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. Another Snotty for Ziggy. I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice. Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side. LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties." My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see. Ah. A window into the mind of a student of the liberal arts. Not much to see, I'm afraid Another Snotty for you for your personal insult. The point is that it is posters on your side of the fence who post most of the personal insults here. Every Snotty you earn helps prove my point. Thank you and have an insult-free day. And I would like to highlight that no one could ever consider my "Snottys" to be considered an insult. They are my way of improving the tone of rec.boats. I have been an inspiration to rec.boaters for over 15 yrs. and my "Snottys" are just another one of my imaginative innovations for my fans. Actually, the snottys are in and of themselves, snotty -- Ziggy® |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:01 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. Another Snotty for Ziggy. I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice. Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side. LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties." My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see. Your little game means nothing, we have all been here. The fact is, JPS, Don, Slammer, Bob, Paul, and Plum never stopped calling names and trolling, right from day one, you lasted a few weeks longer but failed too... This little troll game of yours is no different, it's all there, call it what you will... The fact is, your side is posting the majority of the insults. And you've just earned another Snotty. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:02 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. Another Snotty for Ziggy. I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice. Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side. LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties." My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see. Ah. A window into the mind of a student of the liberal arts. Not much to see, I'm afraid Another Snotty for you for your personal insult. The point is that it is posters on your side of the fence who post most of the personal insults here. Every Snotty you earn helps prove my point. Thank you and have an insult-free day. Doesn't prove anything... The proof is in the posts of the last month and we have all been here to see it despite your childish game... As I stated, I started to keep count yesterday. And your insult earns you another...Snotty. Hey, if you stop insulting other posters, you'll not earn another Snotty. Easy, eh? |
Off T: She didn't make the list
"HarryK" wrote in message ...
On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:06 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 7:55 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 3:59 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 3:08 PM, BAR wrote: I'll bet you are jealous. You couldn't get near an ivy league school nor would England let you anywhere near Oxford or Cambridge. Another of your fantasies, eh? How the hell would you know my college capabilities? After all, it's not as if you succeeded in pursuing a college degree. You didn't have the intellectual wherewithal to even complete a course of study at Montgomery College. Did you even graduate from high school? Maybe, maybe not. But, I still make more money than you and that is what ****es you off to no end. Oh no, not that piece of delusional bull**** again. What's the going rate for a go-fer like you these days? I told you, about a buck and a half. Not bad for a guy that you allege didn't graduate from high school. A buck-and-a-half does not put you in the position you think you are, vis-a-vis my annual earnings. Sorry. I have to be fair and give myself a Snotty for this post. Sorry. Another Snotty for the ID Spoofer. And there was nothing snotty about my comment. Sorry. REALLY? -- Ziggy® |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:02 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 9:00 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:55 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:53 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:45 AM, YukonBound wrote: "HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of Snotties. Only trouble is... these posters are proud of their behaviour. They'll be competing with snotty remarks just to see who comes out on top. It's what they do. I can't argue against what you are saying there. But there's no reason to play their game. If all they can do is insult other posters, then that will be very obvious. We should refrain from playing along with that. PS - I take back all of the Snotty's I award you, you were screwing up my statistics. Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/453...ke-in-my-mouth Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:04 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 9:01 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. Another Snotty for Ziggy. I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice. Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side. LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties." My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see. Your little game means nothing, we have all been here. The fact is, JPS, Don, Slammer, Bob, Paul, and Plum never stopped calling names and trolling, right from day one, you lasted a few weeks longer but failed too... This little troll game of yours is no different, it's all there, call it what you will... Ok here is another Snotty for you. Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:13 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 9:02 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. Another Snotty for Ziggy. I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice. Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side. LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties." My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see. Ah. A window into the mind of a student of the liberal arts. Not much to see, I'm afraid Another Snotty for you for your personal insult. The point is that it is posters on your side of the fence who post most of the personal insults here. Every Snotty you earn helps prove my point. Thank you and have an insult-free day. Doesn't prove anything... The proof is in the posts of the last month and we have all been here to see it despite your childish game... As I stated, I started to keep count yesterday. And your insult earns you another...Snotty. Hey, if you stop insulting other posters, you'll not earn another Snotty. Easy, eh? Another Snotty for the Harry ID Spoofer. For now on I am going to call the Harry ID Spoofers them HIDS for short. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:05 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 9:11 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:15 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. Another Snotty for Ziggy. I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice. Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side. LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties." My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see. Ah. A window into the mind of a student of the liberal arts. Not much to see, I'm afraid Another Snotty for you for your personal insult. The point is that it is posters on your side of the fence who post most of the personal insults here. Every Snotty you earn helps prove my point. Thank you and have an insult-free day. And I would like to highlight that no one could ever consider my "Snottys" to be considered an insult. They are my way of improving the tone of rec.boats. I have been an inspiration to rec.boaters for over 15 yrs. and my "Snottys" are just another one of my imaginative innovations for my fans. Actually, the snottys are in and of themselves, snotty NO they are not. Here is another Snotty for you. Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:07 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 9:13 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:06 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 7:55 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 3:59 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 3:08 PM, BAR wrote: I'll bet you are jealous. You couldn't get near an ivy league school nor would England let you anywhere near Oxford or Cambridge. Another of your fantasies, eh? How the hell would you know my college capabilities? After all, it's not as if you succeeded in pursuing a college degree. You didn't have the intellectual wherewithal to even complete a course of study at Montgomery College. Did you even graduate from high school? Maybe, maybe not. But, I still make more money than you and that is what ****es you off to no end. Oh no, not that piece of delusional bull**** again. What's the going rate for a go-fer like you these days? I told you, about a buck and a half. Not bad for a guy that you allege didn't graduate from high school. A buck-and-a-half does not put you in the position you think you are, vis-a-vis my annual earnings. Sorry. I have to be fair and give myself a Snotty for this post. Sorry. Another Snotty for the ID Spoofer. And there was nothing snotty about my comment. Sorry. REALLY? NO there wasn't. Here is another snotty for you. Another Snotty for the Harry ID Spoofer |
Off T: She didn't make the list
"HarryK" wrote in message ...
On 12/18/10 8:25 AM, YukonBound wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? The way to win is to not play, other than to point out the right's snotty comments. If Scotty wants to "fight back," he'll just earn a bunch of Snotties. I ask you, is that fair play? -- Ziggy® |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:15 AM, HarryK wrote:
Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:14 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 9:13 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 9:02 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. Another Snotty for Ziggy. I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice. Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side. LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties." My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see. Ah. A window into the mind of a student of the liberal arts. Not much to see, I'm afraid Another Snotty for you for your personal insult. The point is that it is posters on your side of the fence who post most of the personal insults here. Every Snotty you earn helps prove my point. Thank you and have an insult-free day. Doesn't prove anything... The proof is in the posts of the last month and we have all been here to see it despite your childish game... As I stated, I started to keep count yesterday. And your insult earns you another...Snotty. Hey, if you stop insulting other posters, you'll not earn another Snotty. Easy, eh? Another Snotty for the Harry ID Spoofer. For now on I am going to call the Harry ID Spoofers them HIDS for short. Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:14 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 9:04 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 9:01 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 12/18/10 7:42 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:03 PM, L G wrote: HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 2:01 PM, Jack. wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, wrote: On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. That's hilarious. Not a single thing you wrote is in evidence or can be proven. Two or three are complete fabrications. Well, I *can* believe you'd feel fortunate to snag a girl that looks like Chelsea in your younger years. You crack me up. :- Chelsea graduated in 2001 from Stanford University with highest honors. She did her grad work at University College, Oxford, and was awarded a master's degree. She recently competed work and was awarded a master's degree from Columbia University., and is pursuing a doctorate at NYU. She worked several years for a top management consulting organization and for a venture capital group. Thus, she is smart and educated and accomplished. Those who know her say she is well-mannered. There is no record of public intoxication for her. Nice try. How are your kids doing? Any of them at Oxford? Where's your Yale degree? You ask too many questions for someone who posts an inordinate amount of bull****, WAFA. Another "Snotty" for LG. He leads the pack with eight, and has twice as many as "the contender." Oh...in case you were wondering, LG, I'm keeping track of the number of snotty comments your side makes about other posters here. Each time you make one, I award you a "Snotty." thank you for your participation. "Our side" can't find an immature volunteer to be a presenter to your side. If you want your guys to get their fair share of awards, you're going to have to award them yourself. Another Snotty for Ziggy. I'm simply keeping track of who on your side is naughty and who is nice. Scotty has been claiming that your side is "less responsible" for the negativity here than "our" side. I don't believe that. While we have a couple of offenders who were active after 4:45 pm yesterday, when i started the count, most of the nasty comments have come from your side. LG had 12 and Scotty himself had seven, and there were four other posters from your side, yourself included, earning "Snotties." My contention is that those on the right do much more to "disrupt" this newsgroup and poison the atmosphere here. We shall see. Your little game means nothing, we have all been here. The fact is, JPS, Don, Slammer, Bob, Paul, and Plum never stopped calling names and trolling, right from day one, you lasted a few weeks longer but failed too... This little troll game of yours is no different, it's all there, call it what you will... Ok here is another Snotty for you. Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer. Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer |
Off T: She didn't make the list
In article ,
says... "Harry Don" wrote in message ... In article , says... In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:13 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 3:08 PM, BAR wrote: How are your kids doing? Mine are fine. When was the last time yours talked to you. Last Sunday. And probably again this Sunday. Not close by. Is that what the court order allows? What court order might that be, s.f.b.? How many are there? Harry doesn't have kids. If he did, he'd know that to say things about someone's kids is the lowest of the low. Why bring Kruger up again... we try to ignore him. Don, I'll bet my three year old niece could read the sentence I wrote and know that it's about Harry. How did you come to the conclusion it was about "Kruger"? |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:16 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 9:07 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 9:13 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 8:16 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:06 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 7:55 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 3:59 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 3:08 PM, BAR wrote: I'll bet you are jealous. You couldn't get near an ivy league school nor would England let you anywhere near Oxford or Cambridge. Another of your fantasies, eh? How the hell would you know my college capabilities? After all, it's not as if you succeeded in pursuing a college degree. You didn't have the intellectual wherewithal to even complete a course of study at Montgomery College. Did you even graduate from high school? Maybe, maybe not. But, I still make more money than you and that is what ****es you off to no end. Oh no, not that piece of delusional bull**** again. What's the going rate for a go-fer like you these days? I told you, about a buck and a half. Not bad for a guy that you allege didn't graduate from high school. A buck-and-a-half does not put you in the position you think you are, vis-a-vis my annual earnings. Sorry. I have to be fair and give myself a Snotty for this post. Sorry. Another Snotty for the ID Spoofer. And there was nothing snotty about my comment. Sorry. REALLY? NO there wasn't. Here is another snotty for you. Another Snotty for the Harry ID Spoofer Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer |
Off T: She didn't make the list
On 12/18/10 9:17 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/18/10 9:15 AM, HarryK wrote: Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer Another Snotty for the Harry ID spoofer |
Off T: She didn't make the list
In article ,
says... "HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 9:24 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 6:16 PM, HarryK wrote: You tell the biggest whoppers, but that is why I like you. We talk about Kruger at least 10 times a day. One "Snotty" for the Harry spoofer. One "lobsta boat" for Harry... One "Snotty" for Scotty. Two for him so far since 4:45 pm. He's making up for lost time. Another Snotty for Don. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
In article ,
says... "HarryK" wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 10:09 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 9:43 PM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 9:24 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 6:16 PM, HarryK wrote: You tell the biggest whoppers, but that is why I like you. We talk about Kruger at least 10 times a day. One "Snotty" for the Harry spoofer. One "lobsta boat" for Harry... One "Snotty" for Scotty. Two for him so far since 4:45 pm. He's making up for lost time. I'm just keeping track, not commenting on the content, other than to point out "Snotties." And every post is a troll, so far you have about trolls today just yourself... So keep counting... Another Snotty for Scotty. He deserved two this time... for his bad grammar. Another Snotty for Don. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829
@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26*pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." * wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am * wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? * ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. *After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. *Coyote. *Not even closing time. * :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Wrong again, dummy. |
Off T: She didn't make the list
In article ,
says... "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article b0bf0886-746a-4dfd-b469-fadbcc8d8829 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 4:26 pm, Harry Don wrote: In article , says... On 12/17/10 3:50 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/17/10 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:58:34 -0800 (PST), "Jack." wrote: On Dec 17, 7:42 am, I am wrote: In article72cf45fd-f2a5-44be-a93e- , says... Yuo didn't make it he http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/...iberal_women_i... Nor he http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...calendar-vo_n_... Sorry, maybe next year, Ms. D'Plume Oh my God.. Garafolo?? Dowd? ewwwwwwww, I just threw up a little in my mouth... I like how in some of the captions, they make excuses like, "this isn't the best picture of her"... ya THINK!?! That had to be an attempt at humor. After all this is one of the captions: "Chelsea Clinton: Poor Chelsea had the misfortune of growing up in the limelight and having everyone judge her by how she looked when she was younger. She's actually pretty foxy these days." Actually, she's pretty bow-wow. Coyote. Not even closing time. :- Wow... even for an OT post, something you're not supposed to be replying to or fueling when it involves insults, you're slimes really hit a low mark. Actually, I kinda look like Garance Franke-Ruta. So Wayne, where's the outrage or have you blocked these guys? Uh, Chelsea Clinton is my kind of gal. Smart, educated, attractive, well-mannered, accomplished, and unlike the daughters of the president who succeeded her father, she avoided being drunk or under the influence of drugs. Of course, we liberals prefer smart women. You must be so happy the "deal" fell apart, I knew you couldn't do it... What deal? Oh, the deal here? Well, your boys never did sign on to it, did they? They did until you, and your buddies slammer, Don and jps started the name calling and childish insults again. Just like you, Ingersoll..... Geeze, your word isn't good at all is it? It's not me and you really don't want to start machine gunning me again, you know how it is when I fight back... -- You lining up the entire population of Centerbrook Ct again? Another Snotty for Don. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com