On 12/7/2010 8:10 AM, Paul@BYC wrote:
On 12/6/2010 4:43 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:03:45 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/6/2010 9:39 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/6/10 6:14 AM, Paul@BYC wrote:
On 12/5/2010 11:13 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/4/10 8:28 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:14:15 -0500, wrote:

On 12/4/10 5:06 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 00:46:17 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

http://www.news-press.com/article/20...ion-from-cold-





Theyr'e on the move Greg. Yep -to the power plant.


I was at the DEP office Friday for my water quality QA and I
talked to
one of the biologists. She says when they do necropsy in the
winter
they are finding manatee with undigested grass still in their
throats.
The literally freeze while they are eating if they venture away
from
the power plant. If they stay there they starve.

Yeah we are really "saving them".

The crime is heating the water.

Gee, on that note, I suppose I should ask my wife to shut off the
"birdbath" water heater she runs outdoors all winter, so that
passing
birds have unfrozen water to drink.


I suppose it all depends on if you support the endangered species
act.
That says you should not intentionally be interrupting or altering
natural migration patterns with human activity.

Both my wife and I enjoy watching the little creatures, and I don't
believe any of the crap they say about not feeding the wildlife. The
animals don't care, why should you?


If you are going to ID spoof someone who can write, you probably
shouldn't write like a moron, moron. :)

Wow, what ****ed you off? You sure seem to enjoy picking Usenet fights.


You mean, other than the fact that you are a liar, a fraud, and a
troublemaker here?

You and your buddies or alter egos "Harry Kari," (the former CrotchRot),
Ziggy, et al, really haven't anything of interest on topic to discuss
here, and all you do is disrupt. I don't know what your problem is with
the real Harry, (and i don't care) but your behavior here is just plain
juvenile. There are many posters who are making an effort to improve the
atmosphere here. You three (or two or one) are not among them. It is
obvious you boys would rather this newsgroup return to the way it was.

Hey 'Paul', as you are so new here you don't know of any of the
problems with
the real Harry, how could you possibly know 'the way it was'?s

You keep making these little boo-boos. :)


You are kidding, right? I read about two weeks of posts here before I
ever posted. It was obvious there were real problems here, and most of
them at that time were caused by a small pack of troublemakers. You
can't redo the past, but you can work to improve the present and the
future.

You seem very tolerant of anyone who causes your friend Harry trouble,
but very intolerant of those who object to the displays of juvenile
behavior those troublemakers exhibit.

Why is that?

Because they're right-wing trash, whose goal is to turn this newsgroup
into a pile of ****, and keep it that way.