HarryK wrote:
On 11/11/10 5:21 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 11/10/2010 5:29 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:20:02 -0500, wrote:


Pentagon can't explain 'missile' off California

WASHINGTON (A) – The Pentagon said Tuesday it was trying to determine
if a missile was launched Monday off the coast of Southern California
and, if so, who might have fired it.

has sarah palin been playing with grown up toys again?

I thought we agreed

ID Spoofer...again. When you ignore their other IDs here, they ID Spoof.
Only if you really **** them off.

On 11/10/10 6:23 AM, W1TEF wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:20:02 -0500, wrote:

Pentagon can't explain 'missile' off California

That's because it's not a missile - it's a contrail.

http://uncinus.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/4/


Maybe.

"W1TEF" wrote in message ...

On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:45:51 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 11/10/10 6:23 AM, W1TEF wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:20:02 -0500, wrote:

Pentagon can't explain 'missile' off California

That's because it's not a missile - it's a contrail.

http://uncinus.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/4/

Maybe.

No maybe about it.

Not to mention a contrail from a jet usually spreads out a ways behind
the aircraft. The front of the trail is usually thin until the wind
spreads it... This trail was thick right off the ass of the missile, and
make no mistake, it was a missile, as it headed west downrange... oh,
and they know what it was too...

Did you read the freakin' article Scott?

Unmentioned in this whole thing is that nobody HEARD anything. If a
missile supposedly as large as this one supposedly was (ICBM), you
would have heard it - even from 35 miles away. Those things aren't
quiet.
---------
If you're upwind you probably wouldn't hear it, especially in a place with a
lot of noise pollution.

"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article m,
says...

"W1TEF" wrote in message
...

On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:45:51 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 11/10/10 6:23 AM, W1TEF wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:20:02 -0500, wrote:

Pentagon can't explain 'missile' off California

That's because it's not a missile - it's a contrail.

http://uncinus.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/4/

Maybe.

No maybe about it.

Not to mention a contrail from a jet usually spreads out a ways behind
the aircraft. The front of the trail is usually thin until the wind
spreads it... This trail was thick right off the ass of the missile, and
make no mistake, it was a missile, as it headed west downrange... oh,
and they know what it was too...

Did you read the freakin' article Scott?

Unmentioned in this whole thing is that nobody HEARD anything. If a
missile supposedly as large as this one supposedly was (ICBM), you
would have heard it - even from 35 miles away. Those things aren't
quiet.
---------
If you're upwind you probably wouldn't hear it, especially in a place
with a
lot of noise pollution.

Read the article... Saw dozens of reports, experts "on both sides" and I
believe myself it was "message" from some axis power saying "see, we can
sit in your back yard and you didn't even know we were there". That's
why it went due west.

Fact is, every single airliner is tracked to the inch by the second. If
there was a flight there someone would be able to say "this was flight
such and such" here is it's flight path... But they can't, there was no
plane...

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - Pain is temporary, Glory is forever!

mmmm.................... whoooo whoooo!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-b5aW08ivHU

YukonBound wrote:


"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article m,
says...

"W1TEF" wrote in message
...

On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:45:51 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 11/10/10 6:23 AM, W1TEF wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:20:02 -0500, wrote:

Pentagon can't explain 'missile' off California

That's because it's not a missile - it's a contrail.

http://uncinus.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/4/

Maybe.

No maybe about it.

Not to mention a contrail from a jet usually spreads out a ways behind
the aircraft. The front of the trail is usually thin until the wind
spreads it... This trail was thick right off the ass of the
missile, and
make no mistake, it was a missile, as it headed west downrange... oh,
and they know what it was too...

Did you read the freakin' article Scott?

Unmentioned in this whole thing is that nobody HEARD anything. If a
missile supposedly as large as this one supposedly was (ICBM), you
would have heard it - even from 35 miles away. Those things aren't
quiet.
---------
If you're upwind you probably wouldn't hear it, especially in a
place with a
lot of noise pollution.

Read the article... Saw dozens of reports, experts "on both sides" and I
believe myself it was "message" from some axis power saying "see, we can
sit in your back yard and you didn't even know we were there". That's
why it went due west.

Fact is, every single airliner is tracked to the inch by the second. If
there was a flight there someone would be able to say "this was flight
such and such" here is it's flight path... But they can't, there was no
plane...

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - Pain is temporary, Glory is forever!

mmmm.................... whoooo whoooo!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-b5aW08ivHU
Nothing boat-related to post, dummy?

On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:41:16 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

Read the article... Saw dozens of reports, experts "on both sides" and I
believe myself it was "message" from some axis power saying "see, we can
sit in your back yard and you didn't even know we were there". That's
why it went due west.

Interesting conspiracy theory but if fails the Occam's Razor test
which basically says that the simplest explanation is more likely to
be correct. The two most plausible (and simple) explanations are
that it was indeed a jet contrail observed from an unusual angle; or
two, that it was a classified US govt misile launch which take place
fairly often in coastal California. One of my old high school friends
is alleged to participate in that sort of thing (if they actually
exist). :-)

On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:31:38 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:41:16 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

Read the article... Saw dozens of reports, experts "on both sides" and I
believe myself it was "message" from some axis power saying "see, we can
sit in your back yard and you didn't even know we were there". That's
why it went due west.

Interesting conspiracy theory but if fails the Occam's Razor test
which basically says that the simplest explanation is more likely to
be correct. The two most plausible (and simple) explanations are
that it was indeed a jet contrail observed from an unusual angle; or
two, that it was a classified US govt misile launch which take place
fairly often in coastal California. One of my old high school friends
is alleged to participate in that sort of thing (if they actually
exist). :-)

"They" refers to the existence of which - high school friends or that sort of
thing?

Just wonderin'.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

John H

On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:07:25 -0500, John H
wrote:

"They" refers to the existence of which - high school friends or that sort of
thing?

Just wonderin'.

The high school friend definitely exists. :-)

Trying to confirm the existence of a classified launch is, uhhhh,
errrr, classified...

The issue as I understand it, is that most of the classified launches
are related to intelligence gathering satellites of various types.
These satellites use stealth coatings which make them difficult to
spot and track unless you know the exact orbital parameters. Some of
those parameters can be deduced from the time and location of the
launch so there is never any kind of pre-announcement or launch
confirmation (or so it is rumored).

Maybe the shadow knows for sure. :-)

On Nov 11, 2:31*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:41:16 -0500, I am Tosk

wrote:
Read the article... Saw dozens of reports, experts "on both sides" and I
believe myself it was "message" from some axis power saying "see, we can
sit in your back yard and you didn't even know we were there". That's
why it went due west.

Interesting conspiracy theory but if fails the Occam's Razor test
which basically says that the simplest explanation is more likely to
be correct. * The two most plausible (and simple) explanations are
that it was indeed a jet contrail observed from an unusual angle; or
two, that it was a classified US govt misile launch which take place
fairly often in coastal California. *One of my old high school friends
is alleged to participate in that sort of thing (if they actually
exist). * :-)

I had a friend from my high power rocket days that is actually a
"rocket scientist". A few years ago he showed me some pictures of a
mobile Scud Launcher, with Scud, that is sitting complete right here
in the US. Was brought over intact and completely functional. At the
time it's existence and location was classified, so he couldn't tell
me where it was. A couple of pictures later was a shot of an
interstate entrance sign with a city in the background. He just
smiled... wasn't too far from where I live.

Point is that the gov does stuff like this all the time. Classified
launches, denial of existence, etc. If the general public knew what
was actually going on, most would probably freak out.

On 11/12/10 7:29 AM, W1TEF wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:18:10 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Nov 11, 2:31 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:41:16 -0500, I am Tosk

wrote:
Read the article... Saw dozens of reports, experts "on both sides" and I
believe myself it was "message" from some axis power saying "see, we can
sit in your back yard and you didn't even know we were there". That's
why it went due west.

Interesting conspiracy theory but if fails the Occam's Razor test
which basically says that the simplest explanation is more likely to
be correct. The two most plausible (and simple) explanations are
that it was indeed a jet contrail observed from an unusual angle; or
two, that it was a classified US govt misile launch which take place
fairly often in coastal California. One of my old high school friends
is alleged to participate in that sort of thing (if they actually
exist). :-)

I had a friend from my high power rocket days that is actually a
"rocket scientist". A few years ago he showed me some pictures of a
mobile Scud Launcher, with Scud, that is sitting complete right here
in the US. Was brought over intact and completely functional. At the
time it's existence and location was classified, so he couldn't tell
me where it was. A couple of pictures later was a shot of an
interstate entrance sign with a city in the background. He just
smiled... wasn't too far from where I live.

Point is that the gov does stuff like this all the time. Classified
launches, denial of existence, etc. If the general public knew what
was actually going on, most would probably freak out.

Wayne, Mike, Scott, Jack, harry. et.al.,

With all due respect, this conspiracy stuff is bull feathers as my
maternal Grandfather used to say in polite company and drives me nuts.

Yes, there are "secret" launches of different types of spy sats and
one time and one time only launches for scientific or other specific
purposes. However, these aren't normal launches in the sense that
they stick a satellite on a repurpossed Trident or Posiden ICBM and
launch it 35 miles off the coast of Los Angeles from a submarine or
carrier or frigate or barge. They are usually midnight launches far
away from cities or announced launches with cooperation from Eurosat
in French Guiana, Vanderburg or somewhere in the desert. The payloads
are never discussed or hidden behind the phrase "a Navy, Air Force -
whatever" mission.

Secondly, a quick launch spy sats are usually done from aircraft
believe it or not. That's because they are small and don't require a
lot of launch capacity for two reasons: one time use and VLO (Very
Low Orbit) trajectories. They are only intended to stay up for two,
maybe three passes in the very tipitty top upper reaches of the
atmosphere and then they burn up on reentry. And they have the extra
added advantage of being chucked up in space relatively close to their
targets so they don't waste a pass.

When I was involved with AMSAT back in the ARRL days, we had OSCAR
sats bumped several times from Ariane rockets for "undisclosed"
reasons. So there's that. :)

With respect to "seeing Scott pick his nose from space" - no, that
capability does not exist unless they are using a high altitude plane
and ever then there is incredible distortion - you have to have
absoutely clear air to get a decent resolution. A picture taken at
100,000 feet will only resolve to 1 mile altitude at best. The best
picture from any spy satellite is only resolved to an altitude of 5
miles on a clear day with high pressure atmosphere above the target.
While Scott does have a rather huge honker, its highly unlikely that
one can see him pick it from a mile away. :)

So, as Wayne said - it's Occum's Razor. Time and place and
circumstances dictate it's a contrail.

Sorry - I'm feeling particularly fiesty today. :)


Hey, I'm not claiming a conspiracy. I'm simply underwhelmed by "military
intelligence." I don't know what was sighted and from what I have read
so far, neither does anyone else. The military claims it was a contrail.
Maybe, maybe not.