On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:51:20 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 11/8/10 4:35 PM, John H wrote:


My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose
only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts
here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories.

An ID spoofer is one who pretends to be another. CH is definitely not pretending
to be you, or anyone else that I can think of.

Granted, from your perspective he is probably most disagreeable. From my
perspective he seems to desire prolonging conflicts. But, your responses
suggesting slammer disregard him make little sense.

Are you saying you find slammer's posts here more acceptable?

Wowser.

Oh...I've sent several emails to "slammer," asking him to go with the
better flow here. Whether he does is up to him, not me.

Yet you berate one whose postings are not nearly as offensive, to normal people,
as slammer's crap?
--

Hope you're having a great day!

John H

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:51:20 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 11/8/10 4:35 PM, John H wrote:


My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose
only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts
here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories.

An ID spoofer is one who pretends to be another. CH is definitely not
pretending
to be you, or anyone else that I can think of.

Granted, from your perspective he is probably most disagreeable. From my
perspective he seems to desire prolonging conflicts. But, your responses
suggesting slammer disregard him make little sense.

Are you saying you find slammer's posts here more acceptable?

Wowser.

Oh...I've sent several emails to "slammer," asking him to go with the
better flow here. Whether he does is up to him, not me.

Yet you berate one whose postings are not nearly as offensive, to normal
people,
as slammer's crap?
--

Hope you're having a great day!

John H


....and this would be your definition of "normal"????
Have a super duper day!

On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:02:35 -0500, John H
wrote:

Yet you berate one whose postings are not nearly as offensive, to normal people,
as slammer's crap?

Let it go John.

On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:18:50 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:02:35 -0500, John H
wrote:

Yet you berate one whose postings are not nearly as offensive, to normal people,
as slammer's crap?

Let it go John.

I get sick of hypocrisy. I know, it's a bad trait. I think I have an allergy.
I'll try some virtual Benadryl.

There....much better.


--

Hope you're having a great day!

John H

On Nov 8, 7:33*pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:18:50 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:02:35 -0500, John H
wrote:

Yet you berate one whose postings are not nearly as offensive, to normal people,
as slammer's crap?

Let it go John.

I get sick of hypocrisy. I know, it's a bad trait. I think I have an allergy.
I'll try some virtual Benadryl.

There....much better.

--

Hope you're having a great day!

John H

Eat the whole package at once, do us all a favor, racist.

John H wrote:
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:51:20 -0500, wrote:


On 11/8/10 4:35 PM, John H wrote:


My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose
only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts
here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories.

An ID spoofer is one who pretends to be another. CH is definitely not pretending
to be you, or anyone else that I can think of.

Granted, from your perspective he is probably most disagreeable. From my
perspective he seems to desire prolonging conflicts. But, your responses
suggesting slammer disregard him make little sense.

Are you saying you find slammer's posts here more acceptable?

Wowser.

Oh...I've sent several emails to "slammer," asking him to go with the
better flow here. Whether he does is up to him, not me.

Yet you berate one whose postings are not nearly as offensive, to normal people,
as slammer's crap?

He's afraid to confront Slammer. It's obvious since he _said_ he
emailed him. WAFA doesn't email anyone - he attacks them right here.

On Nov 8, 7:20*pm, L G wrote:
John H wrote:
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:51:20 -0500, *wrote:

On 11/8/10 4:35 PM, John H wrote:

My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose
only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts
here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories.

An ID spoofer is one who pretends to be another. CH is definitely not pretending
to be you, or anyone else that I can think of.

Granted, from your perspective he is probably most disagreeable. From my
perspective he seems to desire prolonging conflicts. But, your responses
suggesting slammer disregard him make little sense.

Are you saying you find slammer's posts here more acceptable?

Wowser.

Oh...I've sent several emails to "slammer," asking him to go with the
better flow here. Whether he does is up to him, not me.

Yet you berate one whose postings are not nearly as offensive, to normal people,
as slammer's crap?

He's afraid to confront Slammer. *It's obvious since he _said_ he
emailed him. *WAFA doesn't email anyone - he attacks them right here.

So are you, ass****. Go suck the Panty Goddesses dick again.

On Nov 8, 6:02*pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:51:20 -0500, HarryK wrote:
On 11/8/10 4:35 PM, John H wrote:

My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose
only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts
here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories.

An ID spoofer is one who pretends to be another. CH is definitely not pretending
to be you, or anyone else that I can think of.

Granted, from your perspective he is probably most disagreeable. From my
perspective he seems to desire prolonging conflicts. But, your responses
suggesting slammer disregard him make little sense.

Are you saying you find slammer's posts here more acceptable?

Wowser.

Oh...I've sent several emails to "slammer," asking him to go with the
better flow here. Whether he does is up to him, not me.

Yet you berate one whose postings are not nearly as offensive, to normal people,
as slammer's crap?
--

Hope you're having a great day!

John H

Once again, Pope John...thank your " buddy " Ingersoll for all of my
****. He spawned it, he is responsible.