On Nov 7, 11:57*am, Crotchedy Harry wrote:
In article ,
says...





"L G" wrote in message
...
YukonBound wrote:

"L G" wrote in message
om...
Wayne B wrote:
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:22:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

rec boats now resembles a Soap Opera of stupidity, and name calling.

It's your group also. * Make it into something better.

He is unwilling and incapable of that. *It is best to ignore him.

Funny... I've heard the same ( & worse ) said of you.
So you approve of Slammer's posts? *Funny...

I disapprove of you!

Nice insulting, Don. I can only hope that Harry reprimands you for this.

....and you say who wont quit?

On 11/8/10 8:42 AM, *e#c wrote:
On Nov 7, 11:57 am, Crotchedy wrote:
In ,
says...





"L wrote in message
...
YukonBound wrote:

"L wrote in message
...
Wayne B wrote:
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:22:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

rec boats now resembles a Soap Opera of stupidity, and name calling.

It's your group also. Make it into something better.

He is unwilling and incapable of that. It is best to ignore him.

Funny... I've heard the same (& worse ) said of you.
So you approve of Slammer's posts? Funny...

I disapprove of you!

Nice insulting, Don. I can only hope that Harry reprimands you for this.

...and you say who wont quit?

My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose
only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts
here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories.

"HarryK" wrote in message
...

My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose
only interest here is to see what they can stir up.

The problem is that you fit neatly into both of those categories.

On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 08:44:10 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 11/8/10 8:42 AM, *e#c wrote:
On Nov 7, 11:57 am, Crotchedy wrote:
In ,
says...





"L wrote in message
...
YukonBound wrote:

"L wrote in message
...
Wayne B wrote:
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:22:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

rec boats now resembles a Soap Opera of stupidity, and name calling.

It's your group also. Make it into something better.

He is unwilling and incapable of that. It is best to ignore him.

Funny... I've heard the same (& worse ) said of you.
So you approve of Slammer's posts? Funny...

I disapprove of you!

Nice insulting, Don. I can only hope that Harry reprimands you for this.

...and you say who wont quit?

My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose
only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts
here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories.

An ID spoofer is one who pretends to be another. CH is definitely not pretending
to be you, or anyone else that I can think of.

Granted, from your perspective he is probably most disagreeable. From my
perspective he seems to desire prolonging conflicts. But, your responses
suggesting slammer disregard him make little sense.

Are you saying you find slammer's posts here more acceptable?

Wowser.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

John H

On 11/8/10 4:35 PM, John H wrote:

My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose
only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts
here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories.

An ID spoofer is one who pretends to be another. CH is definitely not pretending
to be you, or anyone else that I can think of.

Granted, from your perspective he is probably most disagreeable. From my
perspective he seems to desire prolonging conflicts. But, your responses
suggesting slammer disregard him make little sense.

Are you saying you find slammer's posts here more acceptable?

Wowser.


There's little doubt he's a "former spoofer," *and* someone whose only
interest here is to see what they can stir up. Oh, and the Harry spoofer
is active again, and there's a good chance "he" is this fellow, or the
Ziggy fellow. Note I said "good chance."

Have a nice day.

"HarryK" wrote in message
...
On 11/8/10 4:35 PM, John H wrote:

My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose
only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts
here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories.

An ID spoofer is one who pretends to be another. CH is definitely not
pretending
to be you, or anyone else that I can think of.

Granted, from your perspective he is probably most disagreeable. From my
perspective he seems to desire prolonging conflicts. But, your responses
suggesting slammer disregard him make little sense.

Are you saying you find slammer's posts here more acceptable?

Wowser.


There's little doubt he's a "former spoofer," *and* someone whose only
interest here is to see what they can stir up. Oh, and the Harry spoofer
is active again, and there's a good chance "he" is this fellow, or the
Ziggy fellow. Note I said "good chance."

Have a nice day.


Don't be accusin Ziggy of no shennanegins unless you can prove something,
Bozo.

On Nov 8, 4:47*pm, "Ziggy" wrote:
"HarryK" wrote in message

...



On 11/8/10 4:35 PM, John H wrote:

My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose
only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts
here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories.

An ID spoofer is one who pretends to be another. CH is definitely not
pretending
to be you, or anyone else that I can think of.

Granted, from your perspective he is probably most disagreeable. From my
perspective he seems to desire prolonging conflicts. But, your responses
suggesting slammer disregard him make little sense.

Are you saying you find slammer's posts here more acceptable?

Wowser.

There's little doubt he's a "former spoofer," *and* someone whose only
interest here is to see what they can stir up. Oh, and the Harry spoofer
is active again, and there's a good chance "he" is this fellow, or the
Ziggy fellow. Note I said "good chance."

Have a nice day.

Don't be accusin Ziggy of no shennanegins unless you can prove something,
Bozo.

Keep hiding, cowardly ****.

On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:42:38 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 11/8/10 4:35 PM, John H wrote:

My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose
only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts
here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories.

An ID spoofer is one who pretends to be another. CH is definitely not pretending
to be you, or anyone else that I can think of.

Granted, from your perspective he is probably most disagreeable. From my
perspective he seems to desire prolonging conflicts. But, your responses
suggesting slammer disregard him make little sense.

Are you saying you find slammer's posts here more acceptable?


Did you miss this question?

Wowser.


There's little doubt he's a "former spoofer," *and* someone whose only
interest here is to see what they can stir up. Oh, and the Harry spoofer
is active again, and there's a good chance "he" is this fellow, or the
Ziggy fellow. Note I said "good chance."

Have a nice day.

Thanks.

Probability is a funny thing.

Do you think slammer is interested in the welfare of the group? Here's a guy
who's accused me of having sex with my grandson, based on my posting a picture
of him on my motorcycle.

And you are suggesting that CH is worse? And Ziggy?

Wowser, wowser.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

John H

On 11/8/10 4:35 PM, John H wrote:


My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose
only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts
here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories.

An ID spoofer is one who pretends to be another. CH is definitely not pretending
to be you, or anyone else that I can think of.

Granted, from your perspective he is probably most disagreeable. From my
perspective he seems to desire prolonging conflicts. But, your responses
suggesting slammer disregard him make little sense.

Are you saying you find slammer's posts here more acceptable?

Wowser.

Oh...I've sent several emails to "slammer," asking him to go with the
better flow here. Whether he does is up to him, not me.

On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:51:20 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 11/8/10 4:35 PM, John H wrote:


My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose
only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts
here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories.

An ID spoofer is one who pretends to be another. CH is definitely not pretending
to be you, or anyone else that I can think of.

Granted, from your perspective he is probably most disagreeable. From my
perspective he seems to desire prolonging conflicts. But, your responses
suggesting slammer disregard him make little sense.

Are you saying you find slammer's posts here more acceptable?

Wowser.

Oh...I've sent several emails to "slammer," asking him to go with the
better flow here. Whether he does is up to him, not me.

Yet you berate one whose postings are not nearly as offensive, to normal people,
as slammer's crap?
--

Hope you're having a great day!

John H