On Nov 1, 1:54*pm, HarryK wrote:
On 11/1/10 1:51 PM, I am Tosk wrote:





In , says...

On 11/1/10 1:35 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says...

On 11/1/10 12:42 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:25:51 -0400, * *wrote:

The ID spoofers are active again...this newsgroup is not on track and
will never be.

That's too negative. * A lot of progress has been made.

Not with the right-wing ID spoofers active.

Looks like the spoofer is going to win if you are going to start lashing
out with the political trolls again. This spoofer has nothing to do at
all with *ANY* of the conservative posters here, period.. Now if you are
just looking for an excuse to jump off, here you go...

How would you know the political leanings of the active ID spoofer(s)?

Virtually all of the ID spoofers who have been active here recently have
been on your side of the political spectrum. The exception was the one
many thought was Loogy.

I don't see a problem discussing a current problem here. There's no way
to resolve it, of course.

Again, I state as clearly as I can, I have no connection with the
spoofer, don't use him as an excuse to use my political affiliation as a
pejorative... That's name calling, even if you did snip it out of the
above conversation...

If you have no connection, as you state, then how do you know this:

"This spoofer has nothing to do at all with *ANY* of the conservative
posters here, period."

A reasonable reader can conclude that you know who the ID spoofer is.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

A reasonable reader would not try to look for a hidden meaning.. I
clearly said I have no connection, which means, I don't know him/her,
I don't agree with him/her, I don't caucus with him/her, don't care
about him/her. It is a spoofer, we don't know what political
affiliation he/she is, period... He could be anybody, could be you.. I
JUST DON'T KNOW! How hard is that?