On 10/25/10 8:55 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:37 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
So harry, does this mean I can talk about my kids now without you
accusing me of ****ing her in a tent over the weekends? Just wondering
cause it seems OT stuff is OK with you this week?

I don't give a damn what you talk about, but a few boating-related
posts from time to time would be nice.

I'm trying to remember to put "OT" in my subject line when I go OT.

I hope you aren't accusing me of "naming," "calling," "threatening,"
or otherwise "stalking" your wife. The only conversation we have ever
had via telephone was when you called me. I haven't called Herring's
wife, either. I noted several times that I thought she was a gracious
lady.
In fact, I haven't called the wife, girlfriend, or daughter of anyone
here, ever. Try to keep that in mind.




Oh, and yes, I did accuse you of incest with your daughter in a tent
many times, but that isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, isn't that
correct, Paul@BYC?




Obviously, the "spoofers" are not interested in improving things around
here, as evidenced by the post immediately above this. I don't post with
"Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)," but the fellow spoofing my ID
here does.

Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:55 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:37 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
So harry, does this mean I can talk about my kids now without you
accusing me of ****ing her in a tent over the weekends? Just wondering
cause it seems OT stuff is OK with you this week?

I don't give a damn what you talk about, but a few boating-related
posts from time to time would be nice.

I'm trying to remember to put "OT" in my subject line when I go OT.

I hope you aren't accusing me of "naming," "calling," "threatening,"
or otherwise "stalking" your wife. The only conversation we have ever
had via telephone was when you called me. I haven't called Herring's
wife, either. I noted several times that I thought she was a gracious
lady.
In fact, I haven't called the wife, girlfriend, or daughter of anyone
here, ever. Try to keep that in mind.




Oh, and yes, I did accuse you of incest with your daughter in a tent
many times, but that isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, isn't that
correct, Paul@BYC?




Obviously, the "spoofers" are not interested in improving things around
here, as evidenced by the post immediately above this. I don't post with
"Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)," but the fellow spoofing my ID
here does.


Translation: I want to divert your attention away from the fact that I
have constantly accused another poster of having an incestuous
relationship with his daughter in a tent.

Besides, I really don't think that is libel or slander because no one
believes me. That's why it isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, isn't
that correct, Paul@BYC?

On 10/25/10 9:22 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In articleQKqdnTWgS7fq4ljRnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@earthlink .com,
says...

On 10/25/10 8:55 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:37 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
So harry, does this mean I can talk about my kids now without you
accusing me of ****ing her in a tent over the weekends? Just wondering
cause it seems OT stuff is OK with you this week?

I don't give a damn what you talk about, but a few boating-related
posts from time to time would be nice.

I'm trying to remember to put "OT" in my subject line when I go OT.

I hope you aren't accusing me of "naming," "calling," "threatening,"
or otherwise "stalking" your wife. The only conversation we have ever
had via telephone was when you called me. I haven't called Herring's
wife, either. I noted several times that I thought she was a gracious
lady.
In fact, I haven't called the wife, girlfriend, or daughter of anyone
here, ever. Try to keep that in mind.




Oh, and yes, I did accuse you of incest with your daughter in a tent
many times, but that isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, isn't that
correct, Paul@BYC?




Obviously, the "spoofers" are not interested in improving things around
here, as evidenced by the post immediately above this. I don't post with
"Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)," but the fellow spoofing my ID
here does.

Well, in the spirit of hope I have disabled my filters so we will see..
As to your above post, no it wasn't you who stalked my wife, but we
still remember poor "Mad Cow" being stalked right to her marina, covert
photos taken, and posted here on this group driving her away. How about
Peggy Hall? Remember her? Yeah, "you" have not called my wife... yet...



Actually, you have that completely wrong.

1. At the time, MadCow lived in a condo adjacent to Baltimore Harbo, and
kept her boat at the dock there. Baltimore Harbor is a popular
destination for boaters, and many of them, including me, cruise around
its perimeter to gander at some of the nice boats at dock. I saw
MadCow's boat but did not take any photos of it or her.

2. The photos you saw were photos she posted on her Power Squadron
website. I merely reposted them. She directed us to that site, if I
recall. Hardly stalking.

3. I didn't chase Peggy away. She has said that more than once. I
disagreed with Peggy on political matters, but not on her expertise in
regard to marine toilets.

4. I have no reason to call you or your wife. *Why* would I call you or
your wife? In the only conversation we've ever had, *you* called me.
Should I have concluded you were stalking me with that phone call?

"JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote in message
...
On Oct 25, 8:33 am, Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:31 AM, YukonBound wrote:







"JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote in
message
...
On Oct 25, 7:51 am, "Paul@BYC" wrote:
On 10/25/2010 1:42 AM, Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, STD wrote:

We took our new multi million dollar yacht for a spin around the
bay.
Beautiful day, flat water and it is nice just to be me.

You're the one who posts with the actual name of another poster's
wife...if that isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, I don't know
what
is. What is wrong with you?

And you never wil until you get a taste... My wife has been named,
called, photos posted, stalked, threatened. If you can't accept that
there is a history here you are not aware of, I start to wonder if you
may be just another one of Harrys clever sockpuppets here to calm
things down while he tells us all about his new stuff... If history
is repeated and I had big hopes this time, you will be gone in a
month... I guess only time will tell.

Didn't take you long to turn against the 'new guy'.
He isn't even referring to you...that is, unless it's you doing a ****
poor job of spoofing Harry's wife.

The spoofers aren't willing to give it a shot in making this a better
place.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So harry, does this mean I can talk about my kids now without you
accusing me of ****ing her in a tent over the weekends? Just wondering
cause it seems OT stuff is OK with you this week?

A good start would be you stopping your practice of throwing cheap nasty
shots at my son... who has nothing to do with this newsgroup.
(too much sense, I guess)

"Secular Humouresque" wrote in message
...
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:55 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:37 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
So harry, does this mean I can talk about my kids now without you
accusing me of ****ing her in a tent over the weekends? Just wondering
cause it seems OT stuff is OK with you this week?

I don't give a damn what you talk about, but a few boating-related
posts from time to time would be nice.

I'm trying to remember to put "OT" in my subject line when I go OT.

I hope you aren't accusing me of "naming," "calling," "threatening,"
or otherwise "stalking" your wife. The only conversation we have ever
had via telephone was when you called me. I haven't called Herring's
wife, either. I noted several times that I thought she was a gracious
lady.
In fact, I haven't called the wife, girlfriend, or daughter of anyone
here, ever. Try to keep that in mind.




Oh, and yes, I did accuse you of incest with your daughter in a tent
many times, but that isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, isn't that
correct, Paul@BYC?




Obviously, the "spoofers" are not interested in improving things around
here, as evidenced by the post immediately above this. I don't post with
"Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)," but the fellow spoofing my ID
here does.


Translation: I want to divert your attention away from the fact that I
have constantly accused another poster of having an incestuous
relationship with his daughter in a tent.

Besides, I really don't think that is libel or slander because no one
believes me. That's why it isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, isn't
that correct, Paul@BYC?


Congratulations new guy, Paul.
You've stirred the hornets up against you. These low lifers won't stand for
being corrected or opposed.

"Secular Humouresque" wrote in message m...
On 10/25/10 8:31 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote in
message
...
On Oct 25, 7:51 am, "Paul@BYC" wrote:
On 10/25/2010 1:42 AM, Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, STD wrote:

We took our new multi million dollar yacht for a spin around the bay.
Beautiful day, flat water and it is nice just to be me.

You're the one who posts with the actual name of another poster's
wife...if that isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, I don't know what
is. What is wrong with you?

And you never wil until you get a taste... My wife has been named,
called, photos posted, stalked, threatened. If you can't accept that
there is a history here you are not aware of, I start to wonder if you
may be just another one of Harrys clever sockpuppets here to calm
things down while he tells us all about his new stuff... If history
is repeated and I had big hopes this time, you will be gone in a
month... I guess only time will tell.

Didn't take you long to turn against the 'new guy'.
He isn't even referring to you...that is, unless it's you doing a ****
poor job of spoofing Harry's wife.


The spoofers aren't willing to give it a shot in making this a better place.


Sure we are. We're just a little mistrustful of you. I'll stop my shenanigans so long as you behave. That's fair, isn't it?

--
H

On 10/25/2010 8:23 AM, Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, STD wrote:
On 10/25/10 7:51 AM, Paul@BYC wrote:
On 10/25/2010 1:42 AM, Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, STD wrote:
We took our new multi million dollar yacht for a spin around the bay.
Beautiful day, flat water and it is nice just to be me.


You're the one who posts with the actual name of another poster's
wife...if that isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, I don't know what
is. What is wrong with you?

As a medical doctor, with a PhD specializing in Social Work, and a dose
from the one you loved the most (a lost weekend in Tijuana), I do
believe I am qualified to say you are ****ing crazy.


You can't be much of a man if you post with the name of some other
poster's wife.

On 10/25/2010 9:00 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:55 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:37 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
So harry, does this mean I can talk about my kids now without you
accusing me of ****ing her in a tent over the weekends? Just wondering
cause it seems OT stuff is OK with you this week?

I don't give a damn what you talk about, but a few boating-related
posts from time to time would be nice.

I'm trying to remember to put "OT" in my subject line when I go OT.

I hope you aren't accusing me of "naming," "calling," "threatening,"
or otherwise "stalking" your wife. The only conversation we have ever
had via telephone was when you called me. I haven't called Herring's
wife, either. I noted several times that I thought she was a gracious
lady.
In fact, I haven't called the wife, girlfriend, or daughter of anyone
here, ever. Try to keep that in mind.




Oh, and yes, I did accuse you of incest with your daughter in a tent
many times, but that isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, isn't that
correct, Paul@BYC?




Obviously, the "spoofers" are not interested in improving things around
here, as evidenced by the post immediately above this. I don't post with
"Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)," but the fellow spoofing my ID
here does.


Then they have no respect for any of the posters here or for themselves
either.

Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 9:22 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In articleQKqdnTWgS7fq4ljRnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@earthlink .com,
says...

On 10/25/10 8:55 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:37 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
So harry, does this mean I can talk about my kids now without you
accusing me of ****ing her in a tent over the weekends? Just
wondering
cause it seems OT stuff is OK with you this week?

I don't give a damn what you talk about, but a few boating-related
posts from time to time would be nice.

I'm trying to remember to put "OT" in my subject line when I go OT.

I hope you aren't accusing me of "naming," "calling," "threatening,"
or otherwise "stalking" your wife. The only conversation we have ever
had via telephone was when you called me. I haven't called Herring's
wife, either. I noted several times that I thought she was a gracious
lady.
In fact, I haven't called the wife, girlfriend, or daughter of anyone
here, ever. Try to keep that in mind.




Oh, and yes, I did accuse you of incest with your daughter in a tent
many times, but that isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, isn't that
correct, Paul@BYC?




Obviously, the "spoofers" are not interested in improving things around
here, as evidenced by the post immediately above this. I don't post with
"Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)," but the fellow spoofing my ID
here does.

Well, in the spirit of hope I have disabled my filters so we will see..
As to your above post, no it wasn't you who stalked my wife, but we
still remember poor "Mad Cow" being stalked right to her marina, covert
photos taken, and posted here on this group driving her away. How about
Peggy Hall? Remember her? Yeah, "you" have not called my wife... yet...



Actually, you have that completely wrong.

1. At the time, MadCow lived in a condo adjacent to Baltimore Harbo, and
kept her boat at the dock there. Baltimore Harbor is a popular
destination for boaters, and many of them, including me, cruise around
its perimeter to gander at some of the nice boats at dock. I saw
MadCow's boat but did not take any photos of it or her.

2. The photos you saw were photos she posted on her Power Squadron
website. I merely reposted them. She directed us to that site, if I
recall. Hardly stalking.

Oh, I should add this also.

I did follow MadCow around to the other newsgroups that she frequented,
and I also copied every post she made to a CD for my files. But that is
hardly stalking, in my mind. She may have said she left this newsgroup
because of my attitude and actions, but we all know that just isn't true.

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:14:53 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote:

On 10/25/2010 8:23 AM, Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, STD wrote:
On 10/25/10 7:51 AM, Paul@BYC wrote:
On 10/25/2010 1:42 AM, Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, STD wrote:
We took our new multi million dollar yacht for a spin around the bay.
Beautiful day, flat water and it is nice just to be me.


You're the one who posts with the actual name of another poster's
wife...if that isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, I don't know what
is. What is wrong with you?

As a medical doctor, with a PhD specializing in Social Work, and a dose
from the one you loved the most (a lost weekend in Tijuana), I do
believe I am qualified to say you are ****ing crazy.


You can't be much of a man if you post with the name of some other
poster's wife.

Name-calling and personal insults just get you into the same mire. Ignorance is
bliss. Try it.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

John H