Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:37 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
So harry, does this mean I can talk about my kids now without you
accusing me of ****ing her in a tent over the weekends? Just wondering
cause it seems OT stuff is OK with you this week?

I don't give a damn what you talk about, but a few boating-related posts
from time to time would be nice.

I'm trying to remember to put "OT" in my subject line when I go OT.

I hope you aren't accusing me of "naming," "calling," "threatening," or
otherwise "stalking" your wife. The only conversation we have ever had
via telephone was when you called me. I haven't called Herring's wife,
either. I noted several times that I thought she was a gracious lady.
In fact, I haven't called the wife, girlfriend, or daughter of anyone
here, ever. Try to keep that in mind.

Oh, and yes, I did accuse you of incest with your daughter in a tent
many times, but that isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, isn't that
correct, Paul@BYC?

On 10/25/10 8:55 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:37 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
So harry, does this mean I can talk about my kids now without you
accusing me of ****ing her in a tent over the weekends? Just wondering
cause it seems OT stuff is OK with you this week?

I don't give a damn what you talk about, but a few boating-related
posts from time to time would be nice.

I'm trying to remember to put "OT" in my subject line when I go OT.

I hope you aren't accusing me of "naming," "calling," "threatening,"
or otherwise "stalking" your wife. The only conversation we have ever
had via telephone was when you called me. I haven't called Herring's
wife, either. I noted several times that I thought she was a gracious
lady.
In fact, I haven't called the wife, girlfriend, or daughter of anyone
here, ever. Try to keep that in mind.




Oh, and yes, I did accuse you of incest with your daughter in a tent
many times, but that isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, isn't that
correct, Paul@BYC?




Obviously, the "spoofers" are not interested in improving things around
here, as evidenced by the post immediately above this. I don't post with
"Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)," but the fellow spoofing my ID
here does.

Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:55 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:37 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
So harry, does this mean I can talk about my kids now without you
accusing me of ****ing her in a tent over the weekends? Just wondering
cause it seems OT stuff is OK with you this week?

I don't give a damn what you talk about, but a few boating-related
posts from time to time would be nice.

I'm trying to remember to put "OT" in my subject line when I go OT.

I hope you aren't accusing me of "naming," "calling," "threatening,"
or otherwise "stalking" your wife. The only conversation we have ever
had via telephone was when you called me. I haven't called Herring's
wife, either. I noted several times that I thought she was a gracious
lady.
In fact, I haven't called the wife, girlfriend, or daughter of anyone
here, ever. Try to keep that in mind.




Oh, and yes, I did accuse you of incest with your daughter in a tent
many times, but that isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, isn't that
correct, Paul@BYC?




Obviously, the "spoofers" are not interested in improving things around
here, as evidenced by the post immediately above this. I don't post with
"Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)," but the fellow spoofing my ID
here does.


Translation: I want to divert your attention away from the fact that I
have constantly accused another poster of having an incestuous
relationship with his daughter in a tent.

Besides, I really don't think that is libel or slander because no one
believes me. That's why it isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, isn't
that correct, Paul@BYC?

"Secular Humouresque" wrote in message
...
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:55 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:37 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
So harry, does this mean I can talk about my kids now without you
accusing me of ****ing her in a tent over the weekends? Just wondering
cause it seems OT stuff is OK with you this week?

I don't give a damn what you talk about, but a few boating-related
posts from time to time would be nice.

I'm trying to remember to put "OT" in my subject line when I go OT.

I hope you aren't accusing me of "naming," "calling," "threatening,"
or otherwise "stalking" your wife. The only conversation we have ever
had via telephone was when you called me. I haven't called Herring's
wife, either. I noted several times that I thought she was a gracious
lady.
In fact, I haven't called the wife, girlfriend, or daughter of anyone
here, ever. Try to keep that in mind.




Oh, and yes, I did accuse you of incest with your daughter in a tent
many times, but that isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, isn't that
correct, Paul@BYC?




Obviously, the "spoofers" are not interested in improving things around
here, as evidenced by the post immediately above this. I don't post with
"Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)," but the fellow spoofing my ID
here does.


Translation: I want to divert your attention away from the fact that I
have constantly accused another poster of having an incestuous
relationship with his daughter in a tent.

Besides, I really don't think that is libel or slander because no one
believes me. That's why it isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, isn't
that correct, Paul@BYC?


Congratulations new guy, Paul.
You've stirred the hornets up against you. These low lifers won't stand for
being corrected or opposed.

YukonBound wrote:


"Secular Humouresque" wrote in message
...
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:55 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:37 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
So harry, does this mean I can talk about my kids now without you
accusing me of ****ing her in a tent over the weekends? Just
wondering
cause it seems OT stuff is OK with you this week?

I don't give a damn what you talk about, but a few boating-related
posts from time to time would be nice.

I'm trying to remember to put "OT" in my subject line when I go OT.

I hope you aren't accusing me of "naming," "calling," "threatening,"
or otherwise "stalking" your wife. The only conversation we have ever
had via telephone was when you called me. I haven't called Herring's
wife, either. I noted several times that I thought she was a gracious
lady.
In fact, I haven't called the wife, girlfriend, or daughter of anyone
here, ever. Try to keep that in mind.




Oh, and yes, I did accuse you of incest with your daughter in a tent
many times, but that isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, isn't
that
correct, Paul@BYC?




Obviously, the "spoofers" are not interested in improving things
around here, as evidenced by the post immediately above this. I
don't post with "Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)," but the
fellow spoofing my ID here does.


Translation: I want to divert your attention away from the fact that
I have constantly accused another poster of having an incestuous
relationship with his daughter in a tent.

Besides, I really don't think that is libel or slander because no one
believes me. That's why it isn't the lowest of the low for usenet,
isn't that correct, Paul@BYC?


Congratulations new guy, Paul.
You've stirred the hornets up against you. These low lifers won't
stand for being corrected or opposed.
Really, Donnie? You seem to be defining yourself, not the group.

On 10/25/2010 9:00 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:55 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:37 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
So harry, does this mean I can talk about my kids now without you
accusing me of ****ing her in a tent over the weekends? Just wondering
cause it seems OT stuff is OK with you this week?

I don't give a damn what you talk about, but a few boating-related
posts from time to time would be nice.

I'm trying to remember to put "OT" in my subject line when I go OT.

I hope you aren't accusing me of "naming," "calling," "threatening,"
or otherwise "stalking" your wife. The only conversation we have ever
had via telephone was when you called me. I haven't called Herring's
wife, either. I noted several times that I thought she was a gracious
lady.
In fact, I haven't called the wife, girlfriend, or daughter of anyone
here, ever. Try to keep that in mind.




Oh, and yes, I did accuse you of incest with your daughter in a tent
many times, but that isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, isn't that
correct, Paul@BYC?




Obviously, the "spoofers" are not interested in improving things around
here, as evidenced by the post immediately above this. I don't post with
"Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)," but the fellow spoofing my ID
here does.


Then they have no respect for any of the posters here or for themselves
either.

On 10/25/10 9:22 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In articleQKqdnTWgS7fq4ljRnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@earthlink .com,
says...

On 10/25/10 8:55 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:37 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
So harry, does this mean I can talk about my kids now without you
accusing me of ****ing her in a tent over the weekends? Just wondering
cause it seems OT stuff is OK with you this week?

I don't give a damn what you talk about, but a few boating-related
posts from time to time would be nice.

I'm trying to remember to put "OT" in my subject line when I go OT.

I hope you aren't accusing me of "naming," "calling," "threatening,"
or otherwise "stalking" your wife. The only conversation we have ever
had via telephone was when you called me. I haven't called Herring's
wife, either. I noted several times that I thought she was a gracious
lady.
In fact, I haven't called the wife, girlfriend, or daughter of anyone
here, ever. Try to keep that in mind.




Oh, and yes, I did accuse you of incest with your daughter in a tent
many times, but that isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, isn't that
correct, Paul@BYC?




Obviously, the "spoofers" are not interested in improving things around
here, as evidenced by the post immediately above this. I don't post with
"Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)," but the fellow spoofing my ID
here does.

Well, in the spirit of hope I have disabled my filters so we will see..
As to your above post, no it wasn't you who stalked my wife, but we
still remember poor "Mad Cow" being stalked right to her marina, covert
photos taken, and posted here on this group driving her away. How about
Peggy Hall? Remember her? Yeah, "you" have not called my wife... yet...



Actually, you have that completely wrong.

1. At the time, MadCow lived in a condo adjacent to Baltimore Harbo, and
kept her boat at the dock there. Baltimore Harbor is a popular
destination for boaters, and many of them, including me, cruise around
its perimeter to gander at some of the nice boats at dock. I saw
MadCow's boat but did not take any photos of it or her.

2. The photos you saw were photos she posted on her Power Squadron
website. I merely reposted them. She directed us to that site, if I
recall. Hardly stalking.

3. I didn't chase Peggy away. She has said that more than once. I
disagreed with Peggy on political matters, but not on her expertise in
regard to marine toilets.

4. I have no reason to call you or your wife. *Why* would I call you or
your wife? In the only conversation we've ever had, *you* called me.
Should I have concluded you were stalking me with that phone call?

Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 9:22 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In articleQKqdnTWgS7fq4ljRnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@earthlink .com,
says...

On 10/25/10 8:55 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 8:37 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
So harry, does this mean I can talk about my kids now without you
accusing me of ****ing her in a tent over the weekends? Just
wondering
cause it seems OT stuff is OK with you this week?

I don't give a damn what you talk about, but a few boating-related
posts from time to time would be nice.

I'm trying to remember to put "OT" in my subject line when I go OT.

I hope you aren't accusing me of "naming," "calling," "threatening,"
or otherwise "stalking" your wife. The only conversation we have ever
had via telephone was when you called me. I haven't called Herring's
wife, either. I noted several times that I thought she was a gracious
lady.
In fact, I haven't called the wife, girlfriend, or daughter of anyone
here, ever. Try to keep that in mind.




Oh, and yes, I did accuse you of incest with your daughter in a tent
many times, but that isn't the lowest of the low for usenet, isn't that
correct, Paul@BYC?




Obviously, the "spoofers" are not interested in improving things around
here, as evidenced by the post immediately above this. I don't post with
"Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)," but the fellow spoofing my ID
here does.

Well, in the spirit of hope I have disabled my filters so we will see..
As to your above post, no it wasn't you who stalked my wife, but we
still remember poor "Mad Cow" being stalked right to her marina, covert
photos taken, and posted here on this group driving her away. How about
Peggy Hall? Remember her? Yeah, "you" have not called my wife... yet...



Actually, you have that completely wrong.

1. At the time, MadCow lived in a condo adjacent to Baltimore Harbo, and
kept her boat at the dock there. Baltimore Harbor is a popular
destination for boaters, and many of them, including me, cruise around
its perimeter to gander at some of the nice boats at dock. I saw
MadCow's boat but did not take any photos of it or her.

2. The photos you saw were photos she posted on her Power Squadron
website. I merely reposted them. She directed us to that site, if I
recall. Hardly stalking.

Oh, I should add this also.

I did follow MadCow around to the other newsgroups that she frequented,
and I also copied every post she made to a CD for my files. But that is
hardly stalking, in my mind. She may have said she left this newsgroup
because of my attitude and actions, but we all know that just isn't true.

On 10/25/10 12:52 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote:


I did follow MadCow around to the other newsgroups that she frequented,
and I also copied every post she made to a CD for my files. But that is
hardly stalking, in my mind. She may have said she left this newsgroup
because of my attitude and actions, but we all know that just isn't true.


The majority of posters here are interested in a better, less strifeful
newsgroup but, of course, the ID spoofers, like the one immediately
above, are not.

Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 12:52 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote:


I did follow MadCow around to the other newsgroups that she frequented,
and I also copied every post she made to a CD for my files. But that is
hardly stalking, in my mind. She may have said she left this newsgroup
because of my attitude and actions, but we all know that just isn't true.


The majority of posters here are interested in a better, less strifeful
newsgroup but, of course, the ID spoofers, like the one immediately
above, are not.

But let me add that, despite being on my best behavior just now, the
moment someone says anything that I find offensive, then I am no longer
interested in a less strifeful newsgroup. I will re-join the minority.

Also, if another one of those contemptible women comes along because of
the less strifeful atmosphere, I'll have to harangue her relentlessly.
Please don't think that is strife -- it's not.

BTW, has anyone seen those new automatic boating door locks? I had one
outfitted the door to the head on the new boat. If a woman approaches
the head, the door automatically locks and the a little sign pops up
that says, 'Occupied'. They just use too much toilet paper and water.
Your mileage may vary.