....those who portray the Tea Party as a bunch of racists are a bunch of liars.

"Ekins's conclusion is not that the racially charged messages are unimportant
but that media coverage of tea party rallies over the past year have focused so
heavily on the more controversial signs that it has contributed to the
perception that such content dominates the tea party movement more than it
actually does."

http://tinyurl.com/33pj5qo

Of course, the Washington Post is just another right-wing rag.

Hee, hee.
--
John H

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.

On Oct 14, 8:38*pm, John H wrote:
...those who portray the Tea Party as a bunch of racists are a bunch of liars.

"Ekins's conclusion is not that the racially charged messages are unimportant
but that media coverage of tea party rallies over the past year have focused so
heavily on the more controversial signs that it has contributed to the
perception that such content dominates the tea party movement more than it
actually does."

http://tinyurl.com/33pj5qo

Of course, the Washington Post is just another right-wing rag.

Hee, hee.
--
John H

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.

It still doesn't erase the fact that YOU, Herring, ARE a Racist.

"John H" wrote in message
...
...those who portray the Tea Party as a bunch of racists are a bunch of
liars.

"Ekins's conclusion is not that the racially charged messages are
unimportant
but that media coverage of tea party rallies over the past year have
focused so
heavily on the more controversial signs that it has contributed to the
perception that such content dominates the tea party movement more than it
actually does."

http://tinyurl.com/33pj5qo

Of course, the Washington Post is just another right-wing rag.

Hee, hee.
--
John H

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.

So, if this is true, why haven't the leaders, e.g., Rush/Beck/Palin/Gingrich
repudiated those "few" signs.

No answer from you and yours I'm sure...