Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/9/10 9:11 AM, Tim wrote:
On Oct 9, 8:08 am, wrote: On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 00:45:21 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 7, 3:25 pm, wrote: Chesapeake Bay settlement has EPA agreeing to enforce pollution reduction goals: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/11/AR201... This will have wide ranging implications for the bay, hopefully for the better. I was wondering why they waited so long to take any action... It will cost money to change current practices and the agricultural businesses in and around the Chesapeake tributaries wield an enormous amount of political power. Yeah, I can understand that.... So...*some* political discussions are OK, eh, such as a discussion about agribusiness? Or is it corporate pollution? -- Republicans are the Party of No: No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: 66' Chesapeake Bay oyster bay boat in Guatemala | Marketplace | |||
FS: 66' Chesapeake Bay oyster bay boat in Guatemala | Marketplace | |||
FS: 66' Chesapeake Bay oyster bay boat in Guatemala | Marketplace | |||
FS: 66' Chesapeake Bay oyster bay boat in Guatemala | Marketplace | |||
FS: 66' Chesapeake Bay oyster bay boat in Guatemala | Marketplace |