Chesapeake Bay settlement has EPA agreeing to enforce pollution
reduction goals:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/11/AR2010051105212.html

This will have wide ranging implications for the bay, hopefully for
the better.

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
news
Chesapeake Bay settlement has EPA agreeing to enforce pollution
reduction goals:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/11/AR2010051105212.html

This will have wide ranging implications for the bay, hopefully for
the better.

That's a Stalinist organization! Oh wait...

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:25:26 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

Chesapeake Bay settlement has EPA agreeing to enforce pollution
reduction goals:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/11/AR2010051105212.html

This will have wide ranging implications for the bay, hopefully for
the better.

As a water quality guy I have to say this is long overdue but I expect
a lot of pushback from the farmers, particularly the Frank Purdue
empire on the Eastern Shore but this can affect people all the way up
to Binghampton NY and beyond. I know when I was bass fishing in the
Susquahanna up there I was thinking I could put a message in a bottle
and have someone find it in Hampton Roads

Fertilizer will now be sold out of the back of vans instead of really
big speakers.

On Oct 7, 3:25*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
Chesapeake Bay settlement has EPA agreeing to enforce pollution
reduction goals:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/11/AR201...

This will have wide ranging implications for the bay, hopefully for
the better.

I was wondering why they waited so long to take any action...

On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 00:45:21 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 7, 3:25*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
Chesapeake Bay settlement has EPA agreeing to enforce pollution
reduction goals:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/11/AR201...

This will have wide ranging implications for the bay, hopefully for
the better.

I was wondering why they waited so long to take any action...

It will cost money to change current practices and the agricultural
businesses in and around the Chesapeake tributaries wield an enormous
amount of political power.

On 10/9/10 9:08 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 00:45:21 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 7, 3:25 pm, wrote:
Chesapeake Bay settlement has EPA agreeing to enforce pollution
reduction goals:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/11/AR201...

This will have wide ranging implications for the bay, hopefully for
the better.

I was wondering why they waited so long to take any action...

It will cost money to change current practices and the agricultural
businesses in and around the Chesapeake tributaries wield an enormous
amount of political power.


It's nice to see you two engaging in political posting. :)


--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

On Oct 9, 8:08*am, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 00:45:21 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 7, 3:25*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
Chesapeake Bay settlement has EPA agreeing to enforce pollution
reduction goals:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/11/AR201....

This will have wide ranging implications for the bay, hopefully for
the better.

I was wondering why they waited so long to take any action...

It will cost money to change current practices and the agricultural
businesses in and around the Chesapeake *tributaries wield an enormous
amount of political power.

Yeah, I can understand that....

On 10/9/10 9:11 AM, Tim wrote:
On Oct 9, 8:08 am, wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 00:45:21 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 7, 3:25 pm, wrote:
Chesapeake Bay settlement has EPA agreeing to enforce pollution
reduction goals:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/11/AR201...

This will have wide ranging implications for the bay, hopefully for
the better.

I was wondering why they waited so long to take any action...

It will cost money to change current practices and the agricultural
businesses in and around the Chesapeake tributaries wield an enormous
amount of political power.

Yeah, I can understand that....


So...*some* political discussions are OK, eh, such as a discussion about
agribusiness? Or is it corporate pollution?


--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

"Secular Humouresque" wrote in message m...
On 10/9/10 9:11 AM, Tim wrote:
On Oct 9, 8:08 am, wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 00:45:21 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 7, 3:25 pm, wrote:
Chesapeake Bay settlement has EPA agreeing to enforce pollution
reduction goals:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/11/AR201...

This will have wide ranging implications for the bay, hopefully for
the better.

I was wondering why they waited so long to take any action...

It will cost money to change current practices and the agricultural
businesses in and around the Chesapeake tributaries wield an enormous
amount of political power.

Yeah, I can understand that....


So...*some* political discussions are OK, eh, such as a discussion about
agribusiness? Or is it corporate pollution?


--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals


Put a sock in it. Your defeat is imminent.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a PC or a MAC, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a PC or a MAC, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his current ID.

The magnificent Boatless Harry

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 00:45:21 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 7, 3:25*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
Chesapeake Bay settlement has EPA agreeing to enforce pollution
reduction goals:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/11/AR201...

This will have wide ranging implications for the bay, hopefully for
the better.

I was wondering why they waited so long to take any action...

It will cost money to change current practices and the agricultural
businesses in and around the Chesapeake tributaries wield an enormous
amount of political power.

When you look at the size of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed it is
enormous.

http://tinyurl.com/33myuyl

or

http://www.google.com/imgres?
imgurl=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f3/ChesapeakeBayWaters
hed.png&imgrefurl=http://www.baydreaming.com/watershed.htm&h=800&w=612
&sz=171&tbnid=V51mScLM4i0QNM:&tbnh=257&tbnw=196&pr ev=/images%3Fq%
3Dchesapeake%2Bbay%2Bwatershed&zoom=1
&q=chesapeake+bay+watershed&hl=en&usg=__QyHoa3DNGY cIsyBghZO4eKYMauQ=&sa=
X&ei=v3mwTLitHcX7lweI253qDw&ved=0CCMQ9QEwAQ