![]() |
The Federal Reserve Bank bankrupt?
On Oct 5, 12:01*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 23:46:17 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: No but I think a real manager would help. Someone who has actually been successful running a business Well, who are you going to call? Ghostbusters? FYI, education isn't a business. It doesn't need to show a financial profit. It's a societal imperative. "Profit" is a red herring. How about just running your operation within it's budget? It was MBAs who ran the economy into the ground. So, it's people who are trained to run a business who are at fault for running the economy into the ground. I guess that would include Bush. Absolutely GW Bush is a prime example of your typical MBA They learn a lot about creative ways of raising capital and how to game the system but they don't learn much about the day to day of running a business. "Real educators" are not the people I want running the largest food outlet in my county or running the largest bus system. I don't want them running a $100,000,000 maintenance department and I don't want them making real estate decisions about the two billion dollars worth of property they own. Real educators don't "run" any of those things directly. They administer a system, and most have years of experience doing it. But, you'd rather have who do it exactly. So far, you've said "real managers." Who would they be? How are they trained? The school board executives are always going to be teachers who have come up through the system. Unfortunately the vertical integration caused by *the fact that you can't go very far in the education department without being a teacher assures we have people running it with absolutely zero management experience. ? So, how would you structure a $multi-billion system? You have to use someone? To start with they should divest everything that is not actually teaching in the classroom. Get a bus company to run the busses, get a real estate maintenance company to take care of the physical plant and get a food service company to run the food. Even our boated military does that. Personally I prefer vouchers and private or charter schools but i'm sure that just makes your head explode. Who do you think she be doing the teaching if not the teachers? Then, you claim they should be administrators! This argument makes no sense. The expression is pretty hollow. The failed teachers should just be sent on their way, not made "managers". The reality is you can't fire a bad teacher so you have to promote them. Huh? Who's the manager now?? The principal? You're saying failed teachers are promoted to ?? You can't do much of anything in the education establishment if you are not a former teacher. And, your point? It is very easy in my school district, you can just look at the bio of all of the salaried administration. What county are you in, I am sure it is online. These folks like any opportunity to show off their diplomas and "classroom *cred" The reality is there are no managers in most school systems.School boards have billion dollar budgets and nobody there seems capable of efficiently managing that $1.428 billion budget (what my county spends). We are the #40 school system. 39 spend more than we do. If I was the king, the first thing I would do to cut education spending would be to privatize the food, the busses and maintaining the property. That alone is over a half a billion in our system and all of them are horribly managed. Depends on if there enough safeguards in place. That means regulation and oversight. Who, pray tell, will be doing that? Busses are regulated by the department of transportation and the public services administration. Food is regulated by the health department. * EXCEPT IN THE SCHOOL SYSTEM. Busses are beholden to the same regulations that any other vehicle on the road follows. Food is regulated (not all that well) by the FDA. Not sure what you're getting at. Are you trying to claim that a school administrator can feed children uninspected (regulation-wise) chicken???? I can't speak for California but in Florida the school system has their own inspectors. (Building, health, bus etc) It is not an issue about the quality of the operations as much as the cost. The maintenance department is simply a government boondoggle and a private company could do a better job for half the money, still returning money to stock holders. That is simple to evaluate. Either the roof leaks or it doesn't, the light bulbs get replaced or they don't. Tracking trouble calls, response times, cycle times, cost and customer satisfaction are very easy to document. That is a very well developed business model in the private sector that just seems to baffle government maintenance operations. So, schools that are underfunded are out of luck I suppose. You're going to take the budget responsibilities away from the local officials and give it to who? If they can't afford to hire out these services to someone who can do it cheaper, how can they possibly afford to be operating the department themselves at a higher cost? This very much sounds like a rant. Who exactly are you angry with and why? What did they do to you? Do you have any solutions or is it just privatize everything? I am angry with a 1.42 billion school budget and being at the bottom of the pile in student achievement. Then you find out that only about 40% of that money actually goes to teaching kids. The rest gets gobbled up in the administration. They are doing a lot of things that would be better in private hands. In the case of the government doing mundane things, that is usually the best solution. Someday go to your local grade school and find out how many porters the Unions make they keep in school all day long, just in case somebody needs a cleanup in isle 5... The rest of the day, they sit in a office or boiler room, earning a salary for doing nothing.. -- OH, I could do the 105 footer, but I would hate to waste the last few seconds of my life with my eyes closed, screaming like a little girl...;) BTW...nice spelling, stupid. The " Y " key is a long way from the " M " key. But your in a weed-induced state, and the keys must be talking to you. |
The Federal Reserve Bank bankrupt?
"*e#c" wrote in message ... BTW...nice spelling, stupid. The " Y " key is a long way from the " M " key. But your in a weed-induced state, and the keys must be talking to you. If they do, they should tell him to shut up, go get a haircut and a job. |
The Federal Reserve Bank bankrupt?
wrote in message ... On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 22:52:41 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Like what? What do you consider mundane? Busses, food, building maintenance, things that there are lots of people doing in the private sector for half the money. Well, point us to the administrators? Who the heck are you talking about?? The administrators are those thousand people who work in the central administration building who are not reelected every 4 years. Thousand? In one school district? Maybe in Los Angeles? If you're so upset, why don't you run for the SB office? You can claim you're not just a political hack. :) I have too much "history" to ever run for office. ;-) heh - So did Bush! (no comparison intended) |
The Federal Reserve Bank bankrupt?
|
The Federal Reserve Bank bankrupt?
On Oct 5, 2:56*pm, Secular Humoresque wrote:
In article , says... "*e#c" wrote in message .... BTW...nice spelling, stupid. The " Y " key is a long way from the " M " key. But your in a weed-induced state, and the keys must be talking to you. If they do, they should tell him to shut up, go get a haircut and a job.. Have you seen the mop on your buddy slammer? Better than your bald, pointed head. |
The Federal Reserve Bank bankrupt?
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com