On 29-Sep-2010, Secular Humourist wrote:

...teahadist:

Nicandra Diaz-Santillan, Whitman's 'Undocumented' Former Maid: Candidate
Never Asked For Papers (UPDATE)

The Huffington Post

UPDATE: 2:42 p.m. ET -- Meg Whitman knowingly employed an undocumented
worker through 2009, according to attorney Gloria Allred.

Nicandra Diaz-Santillan, the employee, sat next to Allred during a press
conference Wednesday and tearfully detailed her experience as a
housekeeper for Whitman.

Allred told reporters that her client was paid for just 15 hours of work
per week, despite working past those hours. Allred clai

Why isn't the buttwipe running against her prosecuting the illegal, or do
laws only apply to crackers??

On 9/30/10 4:09 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:
On 29-Sep-2010, Secular wrote:

...teahadist:

Nicandra Diaz-Santillan, Whitman's 'Undocumented' Former Maid: Candidate
Never Asked For Papers (UPDATE)

The Huffington Post

UPDATE: 2:42 p.m. ET -- Meg Whitman knowingly employed an undocumented
worker through 2009, according to attorney Gloria Allred.

Nicandra Diaz-Santillan, the employee, sat next to Allred during a press
conference Wednesday and tearfully detailed her experience as a
housekeeper for Whitman.

Allred told reporters that her client was paid for just 15 hours of work
per week, despite working past those hours. Allred clai

Why isn't the buttwipe running against her prosecuting the illegal, or do
laws only apply to crackers??

As you are a semi-literate, uniformed cracker or cracker wannabe
conservative, I'm guessing you mean Whitman's opponent in your insult to
her opponent.

Here's a question you can ask yourself. Why would a state attorney
general be prosecuting someone for alleged violations of federal
immigration law? Especially in a state where the majority of citizens
have declared their cities sanctuary cities.

Perhaps you should stick to your other area of non-expertise...economics.

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

On 30-Sep-2010, Secular Humoresque wrote:

Why isn't the buttwipe running against her prosecuting the illegal, or
do
laws only apply to crackers??

As you are a semi-literate, uniformed cracker or cracker wannabe
conservative, I'm guessing you mean Whitman's opponent in your insult to
her opponent.

Considering who her opponent is, I was being generous.


Here's a question you can ask yourself. Why would a state attorney
general be prosecuting someone for alleged violations of federal
immigration law? Especially in a state where the majority of citizens
have declared their cities sanctuary cities.

That's a good point - everybody's doing it.....WTF? Based on your absurd
comment, California doesn't need a governor or AG. Hasn't done them any good
in 50 years.


Perhaps you should stick to your other area of non-expertise...economics.

I agree, punishing companies and bleeding the population to support the non
productive is what built the United States!

You read a lot of Tolstoy, or just look at the pictures??

On 9/30/10 5:00 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:
On 30-Sep-2010, Secular wrote:

Why isn't the buttwipe running against her prosecuting the illegal, or
do
laws only apply to crackers??

As you are a semi-literate, uniformed cracker or cracker wannabe
conservative, I'm guessing you mean Whitman's opponent in your insult to
her opponent.

Considering who her opponent is, I was being generous.


Here's a question you can ask yourself. Why would a state attorney
general be prosecuting someone for alleged violations of federal
immigration law? Especially in a state where the majority of citizens
have declared their cities sanctuary cities.

That's a good point - everybody's doing it.....WTF? Based on your absurd
comment, California doesn't need a governor or AG. Hasn't done them any good
in 50 years.


Perhaps you should stick to your other area of non-expertise...economics.

I agree, punishing companies and bleeding the population to support the non
productive is what built the United States!

You read a lot of Tolstoy, or just look at the pictures??


I've read quite a bit of Tolstoy, along with the works of other giants
of Russian literature. The actual books. You, on the other hand,
obviously are a fan of classic comics.

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

On 30-Sep-2010, Secular Humoresque wrote:

You read a lot of Tolstoy, or just look at the pictures??


I've read quite a bit of Tolstoy

Wasn't tough to guess. Other people don't take him as instructive, though.

You should take Gulag Archipelago seriously; it was prophesy for the U.S.
Day one was January 20, 2009.

Work will set you free.

On 9/30/10 5:57 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:
On 30-Sep-2010, Secular wrote:

You read a lot of Tolstoy, or just look at the pictures??


I've read quite a bit of Tolstoy

Wasn't tough to guess. Other people don't take him as instructive, though.

You should take Gulag Archipelago seriously; it was prophesy for the U.S.
Day one was January 20, 2009.

Work will set you free.


Я читал �рхипелаг Гулага на �зыке, на котором �то было напи�ано.

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

On Sep 30, 5:08Â*pm, Secular Humoresque wrote:
On 9/30/10 5:57 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:

On 30-Sep-2010, Secular Â*wrote:

You read a lot of Tolstoy, or just look at the pictures??

I've read quite a bit of Tolstoy

Wasn't tough to guess. Other people don't take him as instructive, though.

You should take Gulag Archipelago seriously; it was prophesy for the U.S.
Day one was January 20, 2009.

Work will set you free.

Я читал �рхипелаг Гулага на �зыке, на котором �то было напи�ано.

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

Плоха� �траница переводчика не как друг вы. Вы англий�кие к
переведенному ру��кому. Hе вы елаете. дваш переводчик работает
правильно хорошее.

In article ,
says...

On 9/30/10 5:00 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:
On 30-Sep-2010, Secular wrote:

Why isn't the buttwipe running against her prosecuting the illegal, or
do
laws only apply to crackers??

As you are a semi-literate, uniformed cracker or cracker wannabe
conservative, I'm guessing you mean Whitman's opponent in your insult to
her opponent.

Considering who her opponent is, I was being generous.


Here's a question you can ask yourself. Why would a state attorney
general be prosecuting someone for alleged violations of federal
immigration law? Especially in a state where the majority of citizens
have declared their cities sanctuary cities.

That's a good point - everybody's doing it.....WTF? Based on your absurd
comment, California doesn't need a governor or AG. Hasn't done them any good
in 50 years.


Perhaps you should stick to your other area of non-expertise...economics.

I agree, punishing companies and bleeding the population to support the non
productive is what built the United States!

You read a lot of Tolstoy, or just look at the pictures??


I've read quite a bit of Tolstoy, along with the works of other giants
of Russian literature. The actual books. You, on the other hand,
obviously are a fan of classic comics.

Have you read them in their original language? Practically all
translations corrupt the original works.

On 30-Sep-2010, BAR wrote:

I've read quite a bit of Tolstoy, along with the works of other giants
of Russian literature. The actual books. You, on the other hand,
obviously are a fan of classic comics.

Have you read them in their original language? Practically all
translations corrupt the original works.

...as with all Russian literature...read 3 different translations of The
Brothers Karamazov.

..............probably excerpts from The Weekly Reader