On 30-Sep-2010, Secular Humoresque wrote:

Why isn't the buttwipe running against her prosecuting the illegal, or
do
laws only apply to crackers??

As you are a semi-literate, uniformed cracker or cracker wannabe
conservative, I'm guessing you mean Whitman's opponent in your insult to
her opponent.

Considering who her opponent is, I was being generous.


Here's a question you can ask yourself. Why would a state attorney
general be prosecuting someone for alleged violations of federal
immigration law? Especially in a state where the majority of citizens
have declared their cities sanctuary cities.

That's a good point - everybody's doing it.....WTF? Based on your absurd
comment, California doesn't need a governor or AG. Hasn't done them any good
in 50 years.


Perhaps you should stick to your other area of non-expertise...economics.

I agree, punishing companies and bleeding the population to support the non
productive is what built the United States!

You read a lot of Tolstoy, or just look at the pictures??