|
battery charger out
|
battery charger out
In article ,
says... "Secular Humoresque" wrote in message ... In article , says... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:58:51 -0400, LG wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 20:08:43 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:43:26 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: gee. buchanan wasn't president in 1864. how'd that work out? Huh? buchanan was pres before lincoln. he had an opportunity to prevent the civil war. lincoln cleaned up his mess As Republicans often do... HHAHAHAHAHA!! you really give me a laff every time i read you... bush cleaned up a mess!! you could be a stand up comic!! very funny! Naw, Ditzy is just.... ditzy. Don if you are going to reply please reply with something sensible, or at least witty. I'm more into factual. Then you missed big time. |
battery charger out
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:09:22 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:29:28 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "During his presidency Buchanan supported the attempt to establish Kansas as a slave state. He also failed to take decisive action when South Carolina left the Union. Buchanan argued that the Constitution granted the federal government no power to "coerce a State into submission." He also recommended that the Constitution should be amended to guarantee slavery where it already existed." calif bill will just shrugs his shoulders and say 'so?' The civil war was not about slavery. yes, it was. Was economics and states rights as the driving forces. ROFLMAO!! hey genius...you think slaves had nothing to do with states rights and economics?? HAHAHAHAHA Lincoln did not issue an executive order, the Emancipation Proclamation, until 1863. to prevent europeans from throwing in their lot with the south in a balance of power play The war started in 1861. The fact that Lincoln, a Republican, the party of anti-slavery was elected POTUS, was a driving force for the South to start seceding, but was enough to cause states to start seceding. You do realize the Emancipation Proclamation did not free all the slaves? Only the slaves in Northern (Union) controlled states there were almost no slaves in the north. some in maryland...a few in other states.. |
battery charger out
bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 20:00:22 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:29:28 -0700, wrote: "During his presidency Buchanan supported the attempt to establish Kansas as a slave state. He also failed to take decisive action when South Carolina left the Union. Buchanan argued that the Constitution granted the federal government no power to "coerce a State into submission." He also recommended that the Constitution should be amended to guarantee slavery where it already existed." calif bill will just shrugs his shoulders and say 'so?' How's that battery charger, Bob? why? cant figure yours out? No need. The alternator on my boat keeps mine charged. Using your boat will have the same results. |
battery charger out
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:09:22 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message . .. On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:29:28 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "During his presidency Buchanan supported the attempt to establish Kansas as a slave state. He also failed to take decisive action when South Carolina left the Union. Buchanan argued that the Constitution granted the federal government no power to "coerce a State into submission." He also recommended that the Constitution should be amended to guarantee slavery where it already existed." calif bill will just shrugs his shoulders and say 'so?' The civil war was not about slavery. yes, it was. Was economics and states rights as the driving forces. ROFLMAO!! hey genius...you think slaves had nothing to do with states rights and economics?? HAHAHAHAHA Lincoln did not issue an executive order, the Emancipation Proclamation, until 1863. to prevent europeans from throwing in their lot with the south in a balance of power play The war started in 1861. The fact that Lincoln, a Republican, the party of anti-slavery was elected POTUS, was a driving force for the South to start seceding, but was enough to cause states to start seceding. You do realize the Emancipation Proclamation did not free all the slaves? Only the slaves in Northern (Union) controlled states there were almost no slaves in the north. some in maryland...a few in other states.. the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine that. |
battery charger out
bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:58:51 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 20:08:43 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:43:26 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: gee. buchanan wasn't president in 1864. how'd that work out? Huh? buchanan was pres before lincoln. he had an opportunity to prevent the civil war. lincoln cleaned up his mess As Republicans often do... HHAHAHAHAHA!! you really give me a laff every time i read you... bush cleaned up a mess!! you could be a stand up comic!! very funny! WTF? I know you are nearly blind but you CAN still read, eh? |
battery charger out
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:09:22 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: to prevent europeans from throwing in their lot with the south in a balance of power play The war started in 1861. The fact that Lincoln, a Republican, the party of anti-slavery was elected POTUS, was a driving force for the South to start seceding, but was enough to cause states to start seceding. You do realize the Emancipation Proclamation did not free all the slaves? Only the slaves in Northern (Union) controlled states there were almost no slaves in the north. some in maryland...a few in other states.. the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine that. didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves |
battery charger out
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:45:48 -0400, LG wrote:
bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:58:51 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 20:08:43 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: buchanan was pres before lincoln. he had an opportunity to prevent the civil war. lincoln cleaned up his mess As Republicans often do... HHAHAHAHAHA!! you really give me a laff every time i read you... bush cleaned up a mess!! you could be a stand up comic!! very funny! WTF? I know you are nearly blind but you CAN still read, eh? bush and his rich budddies treat the middle class like an ATM |
battery charger out
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:44:49 -0400, LG wrote:
bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 20:00:22 -0400, wrote: why? cant figure yours out? No need. The alternator on my boat keeps mine charged. Using your boat will have the same results. your ignorance abounds. overwhelms. it's a wonder of nature |
battery charger out
bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:45:48 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:58:51 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 20:08:43 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: buchanan was pres before lincoln. he had an opportunity to prevent the civil war. lincoln cleaned up his mess As Republicans often do... HHAHAHAHAHA!! you really give me a laff every time i read you... bush cleaned up a mess!! you could be a stand up comic!! very funny! WTF? I know you are nearly blind but you CAN still read, eh? bush and his rich budddies treat the middle class like an ATM Obama is president now, Bob. A lousy president. |
battery charger out
bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:44:49 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 20:00:22 -0400, wrote: why? cant figure yours out? No need. The alternator on my boat keeps mine charged. Using your boat will have the same results. your ignorance abounds. overwhelms. it's a wonder of nature Since you cleverly snipped your failure, care to explain how my response was ignorant? |
battery charger out
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:28:35 -0400, LG wrote:
bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:45:48 -0400, wrote: HHAHAHAHAHA!! you really give me a laff every time i read you... bush cleaned up a mess!! you could be a stand up comic!! very funny! WTF? I know you are nearly blind but you CAN still read, eh? bush and his rich budddies treat the middle class like an ATM Obama is president now, Bob. A lousy president. he's a great president. it's the GOP that's destroying the country. |
battery charger out
bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:28:35 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:45:48 -0400, wrote: HHAHAHAHAHA!! you really give me a laff every time i read you... bush cleaned up a mess!! you could be a stand up comic!! very funny! WTF? I know you are nearly blind but you CAN still read, eh? bush and his rich budddies treat the middle class like an ATM Obama is president now, Bob. A lousy president. he's a great president. it's the GOP that's destroying the country. Sure he is, lemming. Wait for the RNC to march in next month and hold him accountable for his bizarre actions. |
battery charger out
|
battery charger out
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:04:42 -0400, LG wrote:
bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:28:35 -0400, wrote: bush and his rich budddies treat the middle class like an ATM Obama is president now, Bob. A lousy president. he's a great president. it's the GOP that's destroying the country. Sure he is, lemming. Wait for the RNC to march in next month and hold him accountable for his bizarre actions. got anything but teabagger cliches? afraid to do you own thinking? yes the RNC will wn next month. 34% of americans are conservative which is to say, they think in bumperstickers like you do |
battery charger out
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 21:03:20 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote: In article , says... bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:28:35 -0400, wrote: WTF? I know you are nearly blind but you CAN still read, eh? bush and his rich budddies treat the middle class like an ATM Obama is president now, Bob. A lousy president. he's a great president. it's the GOP that's destroying the country. Sure he is, lemming. Wait for the RNC to march in next month and hold him accountable for his bizarre actions. They're going to run his ass back to Chicago on a rail.. of course they will. he actually did something for the american people instead of for the rich. americans prefer fantasy to reality. But he will be rich and powerful so he really won't care. Vacations for life, and a great pension;) Either way, the sad part is so many Americans like myself were excited (even though we voted the other way) to have elected our first black president and now history will show him to be the worst president in history. HAHAHAHA....worst president...bush, of course, was white and rich... bush caused the worst depression in 80 years and gave the rich a massive inc ome boost no wonder you hate the darkie |
battery charger out
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message . .. On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:09:22 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: to prevent europeans from throwing in their lot with the south in a balance of power play The war started in 1861. The fact that Lincoln, a Republican, the party of anti-slavery was elected POTUS, was a driving force for the South to start seceding, but was enough to cause states to start seceding. You do realize the Emancipation Proclamation did not free all the slaves? Only the slaves in Northern (Union) controlled states there were almost no slaves in the north. some in maryland...a few in other states.. the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine that. didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states telling the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states. |
battery charger out
"Califbill" wrote in message m... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:09:22 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: to prevent europeans from throwing in their lot with the south in a balance of power play The war started in 1861. The fact that Lincoln, a Republican, the party of anti-slavery was elected POTUS, was a driving force for the South to start seceding, but was enough to cause states to start seceding. You do realize the Emancipation Proclamation did not free all the slaves? Only the slaves in Northern (Union) controlled states there were almost no slaves in the north. some in maryland...a few in other states.. the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine that. didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states telling the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states. So, for those who did own slaves, that was ok with you... got it. No Federal standards. Anything goes when you cross a state line. Who gives a damn about a neighbor. You certainly don't. |
battery charger out
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine that. didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states telling the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states. so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed. no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property |
battery charger out
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message . .. On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine that. didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states telling the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states. so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed. no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property This is the same thing that Rand Paul likes... don't worry if a business discriminates against blacks or Hispanics. Market forces will "sort it out." |
battery charger out
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 09:43:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states telling the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states. so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed. no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property This is the same thing that Rand Paul likes... don't worry if a business discriminates against blacks or Hispanics. Market forces will "sort it out." these folks have such child like faith in the market. they dont realize the country, as it is today, is the laboratory for their ideas. and it didnt work out |
battery charger out
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message . .. On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine that. didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states telling the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states. so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed. no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free the slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first order. Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run to the racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be stupid and broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to raise taxes on the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out you and the wife are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded fighting as an Ohio Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You probably do not even know a person of color, any color, as a friend. |
battery charger out
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 23:42:26 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states telling the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states. so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed. no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. shrieks the die hard kluxer It was about economics and states rights. yeah. the right to own slaves you horse's ass Even Lincoln stated he would not free the slaves if it saved the Union. Y and yet he fought to defend the northern view that slavery should not be extended to the north, like the south wanted to do with the fugitive slave act. you dont know **** you cross burning morong ou are a racist of the first order. Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run to the racist rant. uh no, grand dragon wannabe. you give bush a free pass and blame EVERYTHING since teddy roosevelt on obama. in your view, bush was great because he made rich white guys richer while destroying the middle class F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be stupid and broke. me and the rest of the middle class. i know you're too stupid to read the news, but there is a depression in this country, courtesy of your rich white friends When Obama or the next Administration decides to raise taxes on the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out you and the wife are rich. gee. the dems tried to get the tax cuts extended for the middle class....earning up to 250K. we dont earn that much, kluxer And my great Grandfather was wounded fighting as an Ohio Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You probably do not even know a person of color, any color, as a friend. he'd weep when he saw the confederate battle flag in your mobile home's living room. of course he'd have to step over the beer bottles on the floor to get to it. |
battery charger out
"Califbill" wrote in message ... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine that. didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states telling the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states. so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed. no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free the slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first order. Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run to the racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be stupid and broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to raise taxes on the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out you and the wife are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded fighting as an Ohio Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You probably do not even know a person of color, any color, as a friend. Swill...lay off the sauce so early in the morning. In one sentence you say he... "will always be stupid and broke" and in the next you say "you find out you and the wife are rich". Which is it? |
battery charger out
|
battery charger out
"YukonBound" wrote in message ...
"Califbill" wrote in message ... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message m... On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine that. didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states telling the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states. so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed. no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free the slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first order. Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run to the racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be stupid and broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to raise taxes on the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out you and the wife are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded fighting as an Ohio Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You probably do not even know a person of color, any color, as a friend. Swill...lay off the sauce so early in the morning. In one sentence you say he... "will always be stupid and broke" and in the next you say "you find out you and the wife are rich". Which is it? He and you are two different people, obviously. A! -- I'm the real Harry, and I post from a PC or a MAC, as virtually everyone knows. If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a PC or a MAC, it's from an ID spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his current ID. The magnificent Boatless Harry |
battery charger out
"Califbill" wrote in message ... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine that. didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states telling the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states. so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed. no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free the slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first order. Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run to the racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be stupid and broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to raise taxes on the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out you and the wife are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded fighting as an Ohio Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You probably do not even know a person of color, any color, as a friend. It was about five main things, three of which were regarding slavery, two of which were economics and states rights. If you're going to call someone a racist, please have some basis in fact. |
battery charger out
"YukonBound" wrote in message ... "Califbill" wrote in message ... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message m... On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine that. didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states telling the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states. so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed. no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free the slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first order. Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run to the racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be stupid and broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to raise taxes on the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out you and the wife are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded fighting as an Ohio Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You probably do not even know a person of color, any color, as a friend. Swill...lay off the sauce so early in the morning. In one sentence you say he... "will always be stupid and broke" and in the next you say "you find out you and the wife are rich". Which is it? I am tired of your **** you asshole. I spelled it out as you are too ignorant to fill in the blanks. You are the family with a drunken son, and you seem to like the sauce also. Bob, claims he lost all his money when the 401k's tanked. He saved nothing. 401k is not saving, it is funding a retirement plan. He claims to be a high paid engineer, not as high paid as others as he has not had a raise in 10 years. Is wife is an attorney for the county. They most likely have a combined income greater than $200,000. He wants the rich taxed. And with his family income he is in the rich category. You should have your spouse read your postings and then she will beat the crap out of you for showing your stupidity! No only are you a former government employee leaching off the government teat, you can not afford a boat bigger than a small used Princecraft. Only way you got to sail on a big boat as a suckup crew member. there were alcoholics in my family and I rarely drink, unlike you who seem to get drunk with your son, who finally moved out of the house at the age of 30+. You should stop sucking up to Harry. He is a known liar, and since you can not google up his name with political speech writers, he can not be very good at that either. |
battery charger out
|
battery charger out
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:47:59 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote: I am tired of your **** you asshole. I spelled it out as you are too ignorant to fill in the blanks. You are the family with a drunken son, and you seem to like the sauce also. Bob, claims he lost all his money when the 401k's tanked. He saved nothing. 401k is not saving, it is funding a retirement plan. i lost 30%. and i saved diligently, like i was supposed to...all my life for 30 years. and wall street, courtesy of the rich and the right wing...destroyed my savings. He claims to be a high paid engineer, not as high paid as others as he has not had a raise in 10 years. gee. all i did was present the FACTS...remember those? if you'd like, i can post the chart AGAIN. you seem to forget ihave the EVIDENCE whereas all you have is toilet paper coating Is wife is an attorney for the county. They most likely have a combined income greater than $200,000. WRONG He wants the rich taxed. And with his family income he is in the rich category WRONG you're so full of **** you qualify for a farm subsidy for fertilizer |
battery charger out
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:19:15 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: It was about five main things, three of which were regarding slavery, two of which were economics and states rights. If you're going to call someone a racist, please have some basis in fact. he calls someone a racist if they dont object to the fact obama's black |
battery charger out
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:19:15 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: It was about five main things, three of which were regarding slavery, two of which were economics and states rights. If you're going to call someone a racist, please have some basis in fact. he calls someone a racist if they dont object to the fact obama's black Obama is Irish. lol |
battery charger out
YukonBound wrote:
"Califbill" wrote in message ... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine that. didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states telling the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states. so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed. no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free the slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first order. Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run to the racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be stupid and broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to raise taxes on the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out you and the wife are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded fighting as an Ohio Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You probably do not even know a person of color, any color, as a friend. Swill...lay off the sauce so early in the morning. In one sentence you say he... "will always be stupid and broke" and in the next you say "you find out you and the wife are rich". Which is it? Why are you commenting on that discussion? Bored _and_ dumb? |
battery charger out
Califbill wrote:
"YukonBound" wrote in message ... "Califbill" wrote in message ... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine that. didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states telling the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states. so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed. no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free the slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first order. Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run to the racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be stupid and broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to raise taxes on the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out you and the wife are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded fighting as an Ohio Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You probably do not even know a person of color, any color, as a friend. Swill...lay off the sauce so early in the morning. In one sentence you say he... "will always be stupid and broke" and in the next you say "you find out you and the wife are rich". Which is it? I am tired of your **** you asshole. I spelled it out as you are too ignorant to fill in the blanks. You are the family with a drunken son, and you seem to like the sauce also. Bob, claims he lost all his money when the 401k's tanked. He saved nothing. 401k is not saving, it is funding a retirement plan. He claims to be a high paid engineer, not as high paid as others as he has not had a raise in 10 years. Is wife is an attorney for the county. They most likely have a combined income greater than $200,000. He wants the rich taxed. And with his family income he is in the rich category. You should have your spouse read your postings and then she will beat the crap out of you for showing your stupidity! No only are you a former government employee leaching off the government teat, you can not afford a boat bigger than a small used Princecraft. Only way you got to sail on a big boat as a suckup crew member. there were alcoholics in my family and I rarely drink, unlike you who seem to get drunk with your son, who finally moved out of the house at the age of 30+. You should stop sucking up to Harry. He is a known liar, and since you can not google up his name with political speech writers, he can not be very good at that either. A rant with a lot of good advice! |
battery charger out
On 10/8/10 9:03 PM, LG wrote:
YukonBound wrote: "Califbill" wrote in message ... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine that. didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states telling the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states. so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed. no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free the slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first order. Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run to the racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be stupid and broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to raise taxes on the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out you and the wife are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded fighting as an Ohio Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You probably do not even know a person of color, any color, as a friend. Swill...lay off the sauce so early in the morning. In one sentence you say he... "will always be stupid and broke" and in the next you say "you find out you and the wife are rich". Which is it? Why are you commenting on that discussion? Bored _and_ dumb? Why do you comment on any discussion here? You add nothing. -- Republicans are the Party of No: No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals |
battery charger out
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:47:59 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: I am tired of your **** you asshole. I spelled it out as you are too ignorant to fill in the blanks. You are the family with a drunken son, and you seem to like the sauce also. Bob, claims he lost all his money when the 401k's tanked. He saved nothing. 401k is not saving, it is funding a retirement plan. i lost 30%. and i saved diligently, like i was supposed to...all my life for 30 years. and wall street, courtesy of the rich and the right wing...destroyed my savings. He claims to be a high paid engineer, not as high paid as others as he has not had a raise in 10 years. gee. all i did was present the FACTS...remember those? if you'd like, i can post the chart AGAIN. you seem to forget ihave the EVIDENCE whereas all you have is toilet paper coating Is wife is an attorney for the county. They most likely have a combined income greater than $200,000. WRONG He wants the rich taxed. And with his family income he is in the rich category WRONG you're so full of **** you qualify for a farm subsidy for fertilizer I "made" $11K today thanks to "Wall Street". IF you lost 30%, how did you fare today? Did you move it all to cash? You screwed up when you chose the wrong funds in your 401K. That's your mistake. Call Obama and ask for a refund 202-456-1414. |
battery charger out
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 21:09:19 -0400, LG wrote:
bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:47:59 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: I am tired of your **** you asshole. I spelled it out as you are too ignorant to fill in the blanks. You are the family with a drunken son, and you seem to like the sauce also. Bob, claims he lost all his money when the 401k's tanked. He saved nothing. 401k is not saving, it is funding a retirement plan. i lost 30%. and i saved diligently, like i was supposed to...all my life for 30 years. and wall street, courtesy of the rich and the right wing...destroyed my savings. He claims to be a high paid engineer, not as high paid as others as he has not had a raise in 10 years. gee. all i did was present the FACTS...remember those? if you'd like, i can post the chart AGAIN. you seem to forget ihave the EVIDENCE whereas all you have is toilet paper coating Is wife is an attorney for the county. They most likely have a combined income greater than $200,000. WRONG He wants the rich taxed. And with his family income he is in the rich category WRONG you're so full of **** you qualify for a farm subsidy for fertilizer I "made" $11K today thanks to "Wall Street". IF you lost 30%, how did you fare today? Did you move it all to cash? i work for a living. i dont have time to diddle my bank acct all day like you do You screwed up when you chose the wrong funds in your 401K. me and the entire middle class. you keep blaming the middle class for doing what the rich gave us. typical right wing bull**** |
battery charger out
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/8/10 9:03 PM, LG wrote: YukonBound wrote: "Califbill" wrote in message ... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine that. didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states telling the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states. so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed. no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free the slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first order. Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run to the racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be stupid and broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to raise taxes on the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out you and the wife are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded fighting as an Ohio Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You probably do not even know a person of color, any color, as a friend. Swill...lay off the sauce so early in the morning. In one sentence you say he... "will always be stupid and broke" and in the next you say "you find out you and the wife are rich". Which is it? Why are you commenting on that discussion? Bored _and_ dumb? Why do you comment on any discussion here? You add nothing. Why not give the group a quick summary of your posts in the last 24 hours that added something, other than personal attacks? |
battery charger out
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 21:09:19 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:47:59 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: I am tired of your **** you asshole. I spelled it out as you are too ignorant to fill in the blanks. You are the family with a drunken son, and you seem to like the sauce also. Bob, claims he lost all his money when the 401k's tanked. He saved nothing. 401k is not saving, it is funding a retirement plan. i lost 30%. and i saved diligently, like i was supposed to...all my life for 30 years. and wall street, courtesy of the rich and the right wing...destroyed my savings. He claims to be a high paid engineer, not as high paid as others as he has not had a raise in 10 years. gee. all i did was present the FACTS...remember those? if you'd like, i can post the chart AGAIN. you seem to forget ihave the EVIDENCE whereas all you have is toilet paper coating Is wife is an attorney for the county. They most likely have a combined income greater than $200,000. WRONG He wants the rich taxed. And with his family income he is in the rich category WRONG you're so full of **** you qualify for a farm subsidy for fertilizer I "made" $11K today thanks to "Wall Street". IF you lost 30%, how did you fare today? Did you move it all to cash? i work for a living. i dont have time to diddle my bank acct all day like you do You screwed up when you chose the wrong funds in your 401K. me and the entire middle class. you keep blaming the middle class for doing what the rich gave us. typical right wing bull**** No, Bob, my retirement portfolio was up $11K today. I made no changes or trades. Your "middle class" diatribes boor me. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com