|
Liberal election tactics
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:49:46 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 11:31:31 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 18:27:21 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... lost leader. wrote: The Only Reason Democrats Win Elections Is Because They Lie No, they win elections because the alternative is handing the reins back to the republicans. Up until 2004 I was a fence sitter, voting for the candidate I thought was worthy, regardless of political party. In 2008 it was nothing but democrats and it'll stay that way until I can find a republican that doesn't have his head planted firmly up his ass. So you admit that you just kind of went with the prevailing wind and you had no moral compass or grounding in reality or a set of principles that you lived by and which guided your life. This explains quite a bit about you. I have been a conservative since before I could vote. Say no more. You've just announced you've had a pole up your ass since your teenage years. Somehow that doesn't surprise me and likely doesn't surprise anyone else familiar with your writings. No, it just means that I have a set of values that were developed in my youth by learning the value of hard work and where it could get you. I do not seek government handouts and I don't believe anyone should seek government handouts. And that qualifies you as conservative. Guess what? I agree with you and I'm a liberal. I also know that I'd have had one hell of a time getting through school without food stamps. I had the good fortune of being subsidized to the tune of$200/mo. for tuition, books, rent and food and worked part time. I got to eat while I was learning courtesy of the government. Now I give them a boatload every paycheck for their investment in my nourishment. Why didn't you get a job and feed yourself. Where is your self respect? I had a job you simple dweeb. I was also taking a full load of classes. I didn't make enough to pay for all and lived a frugal life. Their investment in me paid huge dividends. Maybe someday you can repay the investment the government has made in you, but I doubt it. You're one of the red state blood suckers that costs the government via subsidies. |
Liberal election tactics
YukonBound wrote:
He knows he's a huge failure so he attacks others to make himself feel better. That's exactly what Margaret said about you. If she wasn't so soft hearted your nasty ass would be scrapping the gutter about now. Really? She said that? Your friend Margaret must be as delusional as you, dummy. |
Liberal election tactics
jps wrote:
And how have you distinguished yourself other than by eating 240 Wendy's burgers last year? WTF? I may have had four in the past year. You must have been attacking someone else. Really, you must have been concentrating on another of their menu sections. Were you consuming their chicken sandwiches or may their fish sandwiches in 2009 or maybe their delicious salads? According to your long usenet history, you're a self proclaimed fast food maven, Dan. While your attempt at stalking is disturbing, it's also full of bad information. I never posted about Wendy's food under any name, asshole. Got to go clean my guns... |
Liberal election tactics
Secular Humorist wrote:
Grammar tricks? I write in plain, ordinary, simple English. No grammar tricks here, little man. I *do* know about you, though. Just lies, a lot of lies. |
Liberal election tactics
On 9/20/10 7:25 PM, LG wrote:
jps wrote: And how have you distinguished yourself other than by eating 240 Wendy's burgers last year? WTF? I may have had four in the past year. You must have been attacking someone else. Really, you must have been concentrating on another of their menu sections. Were you consuming their chicken sandwiches or may their fish sandwiches in 2009 or maybe their delicious salads? According to your long usenet history, you're a self proclaimed fast food maven, Dan. While your attempt at stalking is disturbing, it's also full of bad information. I never posted about Wendy's food under any name, asshole. And you've never posted here as Dan Krueger, Bob, DK, et cetera...right. Bull****. |
Liberal election tactics
"LG" wrote in message ... Secular Humorist wrote: Grammar tricks? I write in plain, ordinary, simple English. No grammar tricks here, little man. I *do* know about you, though. Just lies, a lot of lies. Well, you're one of the experts when it comes to lying. |
Liberal election tactics
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:25:37 -0400, LG wrote:
jps wrote: And how have you distinguished yourself other than by eating 240 Wendy's burgers last year? WTF? I may have had four in the past year. You must have been attacking someone else. Really, you must have been concentrating on another of their menu sections. Were you consuming their chicken sandwiches or may their fish sandwiches in 2009 or maybe their delicious salads? According to your long usenet history, you're a self proclaimed fast food maven, Dan. While your attempt at stalking is disturbing, it's also full of bad information. I never posted about Wendy's food under any name, asshole. Got to go clean my guns... Oh, was it Burger King, asshole? You are one weird mother****er. I expect Margaret knows. |
Liberal election tactics
In article ,
says... "Secular Humorist" wrote in message ... On 9/20/10 7:57 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... The funny thing is that low-brain-output types like Bert don't believe they're benefiting from government handouts. The list of what Bert gets from the government is almost endless. ****heads like Bert think it's all been supplied by a higher power and it's their due and right to have roads, bridges, water, sewer, gas, electric, elementary through high school, community and four year colleges, clean air and water, law enforcement, the judiciary and the penal system, a system of hospitals and trained physicians who can care for you, and a system that's struggling to keep our food safe from the ravages of agribusiness. Every thing you identified I paid for from the sweat of my brow. Sorry, Bertie brain, but everything identified is subsidized...the taxes you pay only cover a small portion of the cost of supplying you with what you get. The rest is paid for by other taxpayers. Those subsidizing Bar and you and me must be the rich taxpayers. The very people you detest. Subsidizing? I do not receive a check or credit from the government, I pay taxes. I don't want to be a deadbeat. Tell me how much of a check I need to write the government to pay my fair share. By fair share, I mean excluding the graft that is skimmed from our tax payments. Take the amount that the government lets you keep and send that to the US Treasury. I'll save you the trouble of answering. You don't have a frikkin clue. You pompous ass. Why are you such a hater? |
Liberal election tactics
|
Liberal election tactics
|
Liberal election tactics
BAR wrote:
In , says... BAR wrote: In , says... lost leader. wrote: The Only Reason Democrats Win Elections Is Because They Lie No, they win elections because the alternative is handing the reins back to the republicans. Up until 2004 I was a fence sitter, voting for the candidate I thought was worthy, regardless of political party. In 2008 it was nothing but democrats and it'll stay that way until I can find a republican that doesn't have his head planted firmly up his ass. So you admit that you just kind of went with the prevailing wind and you had no moral compass or grounding in reality or a set of principles that you lived by and which guided your life. This explains quite a bit about you. Your attitude is the exact reason I jumped off the fence. You, like many of your conservative brethren, take a statement and twist it out of context in order to make the other side look bad. Where did I say, or even hint, that I "went with the prevailing wind"? Sort of sounds like I may not have researched the candidates I voted for, which I did, extensively. Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your principles? You haven't been paying attention. I have been a conservative since before I could vote. I learned the value of hard work and self sufficiency. In 1980 while I was a government employee, civil service, I voted for Reagan even though he campaigned to reduce the size of the federal workforce. Voting for the guy who may end up firing you, that is casting a ballot based upon principles. So you admit that you vote right even if you don't agree with the candidate? Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat. They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot. Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware? |
Liberal election tactics
On Sep 21, 10:11*am, Jordon wrote:
BAR wrote: In , says... BAR wrote: In , says... lost leader. wrote: The Only Reason Democrats Win Elections Is Because They Lie No, they win elections because the alternative is handing the reins back to the republicans. Up until 2004 I was a fence sitter, voting for the candidate I thought was worthy, regardless of political party. In 2008 it was nothing but democrats and it'll stay that way until I can find a republican that doesn't have his head planted firmly up his ass. So you admit that you just kind of went with the prevailing wind and you had no moral compass or grounding in reality or a set of principles that you lived by and which guided your life. This explains quite a bit about you. Your attitude is the exact reason I jumped off the fence. You, like many of your conservative brethren, take a statement and twist it out of context in order to make the other side look bad. Where did I say, or even hint, that I "went with the prevailing wind"? Sort of sounds like I may not have researched the candidates I voted for, which I did, extensively. Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your principles? You haven't been paying attention. I have been a conservative since before I could vote. I learned the value of hard work and self sufficiency. In 1980 while I was a government employee, civil service, I voted for Reagan even though he campaigned to reduce the size of the federal workforce. Voting for the guy who may end up firing you, that is casting a ballot based upon principles. So you admit that you vote right even if you don't agree with the candidate? Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat. They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot. Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Why not, the only negative is fairytales told by the Miniority (DNC) Media... Complaining about a 28 dollar lunch while Charlie Rangle and Congressman Jefferson are still doing just fine... Proves what the media is all about right there. |
Liberal election tactics
On 9/21/10 10:11 AM, Jordon wrote:
BAR wrote: In , says... BAR wrote: In , says... lost leader. wrote: The Only Reason Democrats Win Elections Is Because They Lie No, they win elections because the alternative is handing the reins back to the republicans. Up until 2004 I was a fence sitter, voting for the candidate I thought was worthy, regardless of political party. In 2008 it was nothing but democrats and it'll stay that way until I can find a republican that doesn't have his head planted firmly up his ass. So you admit that you just kind of went with the prevailing wind and you had no moral compass or grounding in reality or a set of principles that you lived by and which guided your life. This explains quite a bit about you. Your attitude is the exact reason I jumped off the fence. You, like many of your conservative brethren, take a statement and twist it out of context in order to make the other side look bad. Where did I say, or even hint, that I "went with the prevailing wind"? Sort of sounds like I may not have researched the candidates I voted for, which I did, extensively. Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your principles? You haven't been paying attention. I have been a conservative since before I could vote. I learned the value of hard work and self sufficiency. In 1980 while I was a government employee, civil service, I voted for Reagan even though he campaigned to reduce the size of the federal workforce. Voting for the guy who may end up firing you, that is casting a ballot based upon principles. So you admit that you vote right even if you don't agree with the candidate? Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat. They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot. Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware? Bert Robbins would vote for Idi Amin if he were running on the GOP-Teabagger ticket. |
Liberal election tactics
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ...
"LG" wrote in message ... Secular Humorist wrote: Grammar tricks? I write in plain, ordinary, simple English. No grammar tricks here, little man. I *do* know about you, though. Just lies, a lot of lies. Well, you're one of the experts when it comes to lying. It doesn't take an expert to peg you as a compulsive liar. |
Liberal election tactics
On Sep 21, 10:40*am, Secular Humorist wrote:
On 9/21/10 10:11 AM, Jordon wrote: BAR wrote: In , says... BAR wrote: In , says... lost leader. wrote: The Only Reason Democrats Win Elections Is Because They Lie No, they win elections because the alternative is handing the reins back to the republicans. Up until 2004 I was a fence sitter, voting for the candidate I thought was worthy, regardless of political party. In 2008 it was nothing but democrats and it'll stay that way until I can find a republican that doesn't have his head planted firmly up his ass. So you admit that you just kind of went with the prevailing wind and you had no moral compass or grounding in reality or a set of principles that you lived by and which guided your life. This explains quite a bit about you. Your attitude is the exact reason I jumped off the fence. You, like many of your conservative brethren, take a statement and twist it out of context in order to make the other side look bad. Where did I say, or even hint, that I "went with the prevailing wind"? Sort of sounds like I may not have researched the candidates I voted for, which I did, extensively. Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your principles? You haven't been paying attention. I have been a conservative since before I could vote. I learned the value of hard work and self sufficiency. In 1980 while I was a government employee, civil service, I voted for Reagan even though he campaigned to reduce the size of the federal workforce. Voting for the guy who may end up firing you, that is casting a ballot based upon principles. So you admit that you vote right even if you don't agree with the candidate? Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat. They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot. Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware? Bert Robbins would vote for Idi Amin if he were running on the GOP-Teabagger ticket.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey, it's your party that continually re-elects convicted criminals and "anybody" who is running on the democratic ticket. http://clockworkphoenix.com/~dda/criminals.php Here is a list of convicted crims in the congress, notice the dems outnumber the repubs by almost 220percent... Look at Charlie Rangle, William Jefferson, Billary!!! All you guys need is someone to promise you more welfare checks and you are on board in an instant.... |
Liberal election tactics
On 9/21/10 10:50 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Sep 21, 10:40 am, Secular wrote: On 9/21/10 10:11 AM, Jordon wrote: BAR wrote: In , says... BAR wrote: In , says... lost leader. wrote: The Only Reason Democrats Win Elections Is Because They Lie No, they win elections because the alternative is handing the reins back to the republicans. Up until 2004 I was a fence sitter, voting for the candidate I thought was worthy, regardless of political party. In 2008 it was nothing but democrats and it'll stay that way until I can find a republican that doesn't have his head planted firmly up his ass. So you admit that you just kind of went with the prevailing wind and you had no moral compass or grounding in reality or a set of principles that you lived by and which guided your life. This explains quite a bit about you. Your attitude is the exact reason I jumped off the fence. You, like many of your conservative brethren, take a statement and twist it out of context in order to make the other side look bad. Where did I say, or even hint, that I "went with the prevailing wind"? Sort of sounds like I may not have researched the candidates I voted for, which I did, extensively. Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your principles? You haven't been paying attention. I have been a conservative since before I could vote. I learned the value of hard work and self sufficiency. In 1980 while I was a government employee, civil service, I voted for Reagan even though he campaigned to reduce the size of the federal workforce. Voting for the guy who may end up firing you, that is casting a ballot based upon principles. So you admit that you vote right even if you don't agree with the candidate? Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat. They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot. Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware? Bert Robbins would vote for Idi Amin if he were running on the GOP-Teabagger ticket.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey, it's your party that continually re-elects convicted criminals and "anybody" who is running on the democratic ticket. http://clockworkphoenix.com/~dda/criminals.php Here is a list of convicted crims in the congress, notice the dems outnumber the repubs by almost 220percent... Look at Charlie Rangle, William Jefferson, Billary!!! All you guys need is someone to promise you more welfare checks and you are on board in an instant.... As if your opinion on anything mattered...you're an uneducated, unemployable, sucker on society... |
Liberal election tactics
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 08:11:59 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... Why didn't you get a job and feed yourself. Where is your self respect? I had a job you simple dweeb. I was also taking a full load of classes. I didn't make enough to pay for all and lived a frugal life. Obviously you were not supporting yourself. You were suckling at the government teat. Their investment in me paid huge dividends. Prove it. **** you, asshole. |
Liberal election tactics
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 07:11:31 -0700, Jordon
wrote: BAR wrote: In , says... BAR wrote: In , says... lost leader. wrote: The Only Reason Democrats Win Elections Is Because They Lie No, they win elections because the alternative is handing the reins back to the republicans. Up until 2004 I was a fence sitter, voting for the candidate I thought was worthy, regardless of political party. In 2008 it was nothing but democrats and it'll stay that way until I can find a republican that doesn't have his head planted firmly up his ass. So you admit that you just kind of went with the prevailing wind and you had no moral compass or grounding in reality or a set of principles that you lived by and which guided your life. This explains quite a bit about you. Your attitude is the exact reason I jumped off the fence. You, like many of your conservative brethren, take a statement and twist it out of context in order to make the other side look bad. Where did I say, or even hint, that I "went with the prevailing wind"? Sort of sounds like I may not have researched the candidates I voted for, which I did, extensively. Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your principles? You haven't been paying attention. I have been a conservative since before I could vote. I learned the value of hard work and self sufficiency. In 1980 while I was a government employee, civil service, I voted for Reagan even though he campaigned to reduce the size of the federal workforce. Voting for the guy who may end up firing you, that is casting a ballot based upon principles. So you admit that you vote right even if you don't agree with the candidate? Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat. They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot. Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware? The polls have her down by 12% so there's obviously a lot of folks just like Bertie who live in DE who'll be pleased to vote for a ****ing loon who includes the major plank of anti-masturbation in her right wing Jesus is king and the only guy she'd **** if they could only transport her back there platform. Oh wait, he's Jewish? |
Liberal election tactics
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 08:09:28 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... It is still a fact that Obama will be raising taxes on everyone on January 1, 2011. I haven't heard Obama begging congress to send him a bill that will extend the Bush tax cuts, like he did with the stimulus and health care, the begging part. If nothing is done to extend the Bush tax cuts it will be Obama's tax increases during the middle of a recession. And, this will be the mantra of the right thru 2012. So, whine all you want about how the media slices and dices video footage or audio. But, know this, Obama's tax increases are coming and they will be here quickly and they will be known as Obama's tax increases, during the middle of a recession. Blah, blah, blah. Can't admit your lord and savior Hannity is screw-loose liar? Bonehead. You look good when you are whining. Huh? You look stupid when spouting non-sequiturs. |
Liberal election tactics
On 9/21/10 1:39 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, STD" wrote in message ... On 9/21/10 12:30 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: "Harry ?" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "LG" wrote in message ... Secular Humorist wrote: Grammar tricks? I write in plain, ordinary, simple English. No grammar tricks here, little man. I *do* know about you, though. Just lies, a lot of lies. Well, you're one of the experts when it comes to lying. It doesn't take an expert to peg you as a compulsive liar. Let us know when you lose your title of expert liar. Shame, Shame, Shame. My Harry has the title of rec.boats KING OF LIARS. Anyone else in here are 2nd rate amateurs in the lying arena, and are such a distance 2nd that they should not even be included in the running. Harry has very little in his life to be proud of, please don't try to take this one achievement away from him. -- Dr. Karen Grear Harry's Landlord Good grief... you're unsatisfied as a man, so you pretend to be a woman? Get a life! I am a very beautiful young bride, who made one mistake and married Harry. You on the other hand are an old biddy who really wished she was a man. Get a life! You probably post 200 posts to my 1 post, so you tell me who needs to get a life. -- Dr. Karen Grear Harry's Landlord |
Liberal election tactics
"jps" wrote in message ...
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 08:11:59 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... Why didn't you get a job and feed yourself. Where is your self respect? I had a job you simple dweeb. I was also taking a full load of classes. I didn't make enough to pay for all and lived a frugal life. Obviously you were not supporting yourself. You were suckling at the government teat. Their investment in me paid huge dividends. Prove it. **** you, asshole. Only a well educated man could have come up with that line. Well done. |
Liberal election tactics
"jps" wrote in message ...
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 07:11:31 -0700, Jordon wrote: BAR wrote: In , says... BAR wrote: In , says... lost leader. wrote: The Only Reason Democrats Win Elections Is Because They Lie No, they win elections because the alternative is handing the reins back to the republicans. Up until 2004 I was a fence sitter, voting for the candidate I thought was worthy, regardless of political party. In 2008 it was nothing but democrats and it'll stay that way until I can find a republican that doesn't have his head planted firmly up his ass. So you admit that you just kind of went with the prevailing wind and you had no moral compass or grounding in reality or a set of principles that you lived by and which guided your life. This explains quite a bit about you. Your attitude is the exact reason I jumped off the fence. You, like many of your conservative brethren, take a statement and twist it out of context in order to make the other side look bad. Where did I say, or even hint, that I "went with the prevailing wind"? Sort of sounds like I may not have researched the candidates I voted for, which I did, extensively. Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your principles? You haven't been paying attention. I have been a conservative since before I could vote. I learned the value of hard work and self sufficiency. In 1980 while I was a government employee, civil service, I voted for Reagan even though he campaigned to reduce the size of the federal workforce. Voting for the guy who may end up firing you, that is casting a ballot based upon principles. So you admit that you vote right even if you don't agree with the candidate? Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat. They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot. Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware? The polls have her down by 12% so there's obviously a lot of folks just like Bertie who live in DE who'll be pleased to vote for a ****ing loon who includes the major plank of anti-masturbation in her right wing Jesus is king and the only guy she'd **** if they could only transport her back there platform. Oh wait, he's Jewish? Another JPS gem. Which ****ING school did you attend? |
Liberal election tactics
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ...
"Harry ?" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "LG" wrote in message ... Secular Humorist wrote: Grammar tricks? I write in plain, ordinary, simple English. No grammar tricks here, little man. I *do* know about you, though. Just lies, a lot of lies. Well, you're one of the experts when it comes to lying. It doesn't take an expert to peg you as a compulsive liar. Let us know when you lose your title of expert liar. Lame one delaplum |
Liberal election tactics
"Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, STD" wrote in message ...
On 9/21/10 1:39 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: "Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, STD" wrote in message ... On 9/21/10 12:30 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: "Harry ?" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "LG" wrote in message ... Secular Humorist wrote: Grammar tricks? I write in plain, ordinary, simple English. No grammar tricks here, little man. I *do* know about you, though. Just lies, a lot of lies. Well, you're one of the experts when it comes to lying. It doesn't take an expert to peg you as a compulsive liar. Let us know when you lose your title of expert liar. Shame, Shame, Shame. My Harry has the title of rec.boats KING OF LIARS. Anyone else in here are 2nd rate amateurs in the lying arena, and are such a distance 2nd that they should not even be included in the running. Harry has very little in his life to be proud of, please don't try to take this one achievement away from him. -- Dr. Karen Grear Harry's Landlord Good grief... you're unsatisfied as a man, so you pretend to be a woman? Get a life! I am a very beautiful young bride, who made one mistake and married Harry. You on the other hand are an old biddy who really wished she was a man. Get a life! You probably post 200 posts to my 1 post, so you tell me who needs to get a life. -- Dr. Karen Grear Harry's Landlord In your professional opinion Dr. Karen; What drives delaplume to come here day after day, week after week, month after month. Is it our wit and charm or something more primal? |
Liberal election tactics
Secular Humorist wrote:
On 9/20/10 7:25 PM, LG wrote: jps wrote: And how have you distinguished yourself other than by eating 240 Wendy's burgers last year? WTF? I may have had four in the past year. You must have been attacking someone else. Really, you must have been concentrating on another of their menu sections. Were you consuming their chicken sandwiches or may their fish sandwiches in 2009 or maybe their delicious salads? According to your long usenet history, you're a self proclaimed fast food maven, Dan. While your attempt at stalking is disturbing, it's also full of bad information. I never posted about Wendy's food under any name, asshole. And you've never posted here as Dan Krueger, Bob, DK, et cetera...right. Bull****. |
Liberal election tactics
jps wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:25:37 -0400, wrote: jps wrote: And how have you distinguished yourself other than by eating 240 Wendy's burgers last year? WTF? I may have had four in the past year. You must have been attacking someone else. Really, you must have been concentrating on another of their menu sections. Were you consuming their chicken sandwiches or may their fish sandwiches in 2009 or maybe their delicious salads? According to your long usenet history, you're a self proclaimed fast food maven, Dan. While your attempt at stalking is disturbing, it's also full of bad information. I never posted about Wendy's food under any name, asshole. Got to go clean my guns... Oh, was it Burger King, asshole? You are one weird mother****er. I expect Margaret knows. I never eat at Burger King. I expect you are wrong. |
Liberal election tactics
|
Liberal election tactics
|
Liberal election tactics
On 9/23/10 8:06 AM, BAR wrote:
In , says... Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your principles? You haven't been paying attention. Yes, I have been paying attention. Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat. They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot. Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware? I would not vote for the bearded Marxist. A. He's not a marxist. B. You'd have no problems voting for a moron like O'Donnell. |
Liberal election tactics
"Secular Humorist" wrote in message ...
On 9/23/10 8:06 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your principles? You haven't been paying attention. Yes, I have been paying attention. Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat. They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot. Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware? I would not vote for the bearded Marxist. A. He's not a marxist. B. You'd have no problems voting for a moron like O'Donnell. She's on her way to the White House in 2012. If Obama did it with a couple of cheap phrases, there's no reason she couldn't replace him with a wink and a smile. I'll bet you could get a hold of a copy of her college transcripts an her birth certificate too. |
Liberal election tactics
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 08:18:15 -0400, Secular Humorist
wrote: On 9/23/10 8:06 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your principles? You haven't been paying attention. Yes, I have been paying attention. Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat. They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot. Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware? I would not vote for the bearded Marxist. A. He's not a marxist. B. You'd have no problems voting for a moron like O'Donnell. Republicans favor dummies. |
Liberal election tactics
"Harry ?" wrote in message ... "Secular Humorist" wrote in message ... On 9/23/10 8:06 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your principles? You haven't been paying attention. Yes, I have been paying attention. Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat. They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot. Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware? I would not vote for the bearded Marxist. A. He's not a marxist. B. You'd have no problems voting for a moron like O'Donnell. She's on her way to the White House in 2012. If Obama did it with a couple of cheap phrases, there's no reason she couldn't replace him with a wink and a smile. I'll bet you could get a hold of a copy of her college transcripts an her birth certificate too. I guess you think she'll put out for you. |
Liberal election tactics
In article ,
says... "Harry ?" wrote in message ... "Secular Humorist" wrote in message ... On 9/23/10 8:06 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your principles? You haven't been paying attention. Yes, I have been paying attention. Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat. They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot. Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware? I would not vote for the bearded Marxist. A. He's not a marxist. B. You'd have no problems voting for a moron like O'Donnell. She's on her way to the White House in 2012. If Obama did it with a couple of cheap phrases, there's no reason she couldn't replace him with a wink and a smile. I'll bet you could get a hold of a copy of her college transcripts an her birth certificate too. I guess you think she'll put out for you. Okay, now THAT was funny! |
Liberal election tactics
Harry ? wrote:
"Secular wrote in message ... On 9/23/10 8:06 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your principles? You haven't been paying attention. Yes, I have been paying attention. Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat. They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot. Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware? I would not vote for the bearded Marxist. A. He's not a marxist. B. You'd have no problems voting for a moron like O'Donnell. She's on her way to the White House in 2012. I hear there are homeless people in that area of DC so I guess that's possible. At least Palin had a couple of jobs before running. If Obama did it with a couple of cheap phrases, there's no reason she couldn't replace him with a wink and a smile. I'll bet you could get a hold of a copy of her college transcripts an her birth certificate too. I hear that she just received her diploma, after finishing school in 1993, which is sort of odd. So she ran for senate in 2006 and 2008 without one. |
Liberal election tactics
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ...
"Harry ?" wrote in message ... "Secular Humorist" wrote in message ... On 9/23/10 8:06 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your principles? You haven't been paying attention. Yes, I have been paying attention. Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat. They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot. Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware? I would not vote for the bearded Marxist. A. He's not a marxist. B. You'd have no problems voting for a moron like O'Donnell. She's on her way to the White House in 2012. If Obama did it with a couple of cheap phrases, there's no reason she couldn't replace him with a wink and a smile. I'll bet you could get a hold of a copy of her college transcripts an her birth certificate too. I guess you think she'll put out for you. That was sooooo stupid. I can see what's on your mind. |
Liberal election tactics
"Secular Humorist" wrote in message ...
In article , says... "Harry ?" wrote in message ... "Secular Humorist" wrote in message ... On 9/23/10 8:06 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your principles? You haven't been paying attention. Yes, I have been paying attention. Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat. They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot. Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware? I would not vote for the bearded Marxist. A. He's not a marxist. B. You'd have no problems voting for a moron like O'Donnell. She's on her way to the White House in 2012. If Obama did it with a couple of cheap phrases, there's no reason she couldn't replace him with a wink and a smile. I'll bet you could get a hold of a copy of her college transcripts an her birth certificate too. I guess you think she'll put out for you. Okay, now THAT was funny! Really? I think she(Plume) is pathetic. |
Liberal election tactics
In article ,
says... "Secular Humorist" wrote in message ... In article , says... "Harry ?" wrote in message ... "Secular Humorist" wrote in message ... On 9/23/10 8:06 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your principles? You haven't been paying attention. Yes, I have been paying attention. Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat. They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot. Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware? I would not vote for the bearded Marxist. A. He's not a marxist. B. You'd have no problems voting for a moron like O'Donnell. She's on her way to the White House in 2012. If Obama did it with a couple of cheap phrases, there's no reason she couldn't replace him with a wink and a smile. I'll bet you could get a hold of a copy of her college transcripts an her birth certificate too. I guess you think she'll put out for you. Okay, now THAT was funny! Really? I think she(Plume) is pathetic. Yeah, but I think she believes all of my tall tales. Did I ever tell you about my father's fireboat welcome in New York City? Or my Yale degree? |
Liberal election tactics
On 9/23/2010 4:38 PM, Secular Humorist wrote:
In , says... "Secular wrote in message ... In , says... "Harry wrote in message ... "Secular wrote in message ... On 9/23/10 8:06 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your principles? You haven't been paying attention. Yes, I have been paying attention. Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat. They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot. Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware? I would not vote for the bearded Marxist. A. He's not a marxist. B. You'd have no problems voting for a moron like O'Donnell. She's on her way to the White House in 2012. If Obama did it with a couple of cheap phrases, there's no reason she couldn't replace him with a wink and a smile. I'll bet you could get a hold of a copy of her college transcripts an her birth certificate too. I guess you think she'll put out for you. Okay, now THAT was funny! Really? I think she(Plume) is pathetic. Yeah, but I think she believes all of my tall tales. Did I ever tell you about my father's fireboat welcome in New York City? Or my Yale degree? What was the name of that idiot who used to post here who had it in for Harry? Wasn't it Loogey or something like that? Are you Loogey? |
Liberal election tactics
On 9/23/2010 4:14 PM, Harry ? wrote:
"Secular wrote in message ... In , says... "Harry wrote in message ... "Secular wrote in message ... On 9/23/10 8:06 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your principles? You haven't been paying attention. Yes, I have been paying attention. Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat. They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot. Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware? I would not vote for the bearded Marxist. A. He's not a marxist. B. You'd have no problems voting for a moron like O'Donnell. She's on her way to the White House in 2012. If Obama did it with a couple of cheap phrases, there's no reason she couldn't replace him with a wink and a smile. I'll bet you could get a hold of a copy of her college transcripts an her birth certificate too. I guess you think she'll put out for you. Okay, now THAT was funny! Really? I think she(Plume) is pathetic. But you're a liar. You are here posting with someone else's name. So what you think isn't too relevant is it? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com