On 9/16/10 10:15 AM, Jack wrote:
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.
You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's
initiative and independence.
You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could
and should do for themselves.

William E. Boetchker


In other words, whatever serves the rich is...right. Right? Bull****.

In article , says...

On 9/16/10 10:15 AM, Jack wrote:
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.
You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's
initiative and independence.
You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could
and should do for themselves.

William E. Boetchker


In other words, whatever serves the rich is...right. Right? Bull****.

Give your belongings to the poor then spoofer.

"Secular Humorist" wrote in message ...
On 9/16/10 10:15 AM, Jack wrote:
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.
You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's
initiative and independence.
You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could
and should do for themselves.

William E. Boetchker


In other words, whatever serves the rich is...right. Right? Bull****.

Harry Krause calling all of those points bull****. Who would have guessed.
BTW You, or should I say your wife, would be considered rich by most of the Obama supporters.

In article ,
says...

"Secular Humorist" wrote in message ...
On 9/16/10 10:15 AM, Jack wrote:
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.
You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's
initiative and independence.
You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could
and should do for themselves.

William E. Boetchker


In other words, whatever serves the rich is...right. Right? Bull****.

Harry Krause calling all of those points bull****. Who would have guessed.
BTW You, or should I say your wife, would be considered rich by most of the Obama supporters.

That's nothing, Harry would be considered "smart" by most of the Obama
supporters too! LOL!!!

--
A "Teanderthal" is a person who doesn't understand what the Tea Party is
and who they represent.

On 9/16/10 11:40 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

"Secular wrote in message ...
On 9/16/10 10:15 AM, Jack wrote:
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.
You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's
initiative and independence.
You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could
and should do for themselves.

William E. Boetchker


In other words, whatever serves the rich is...right. Right? Bull****.

Harry Krause calling all of those points bull****. Who would have guessed.
BTW You, or should I say your wife, would be considered rich by most of the Obama supporters.

That's nothing, Harry would be considered "smart" by most of the Obama
supporters too! LOL!!!


Certainly smarter than you are.

On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:55:29 -0400, Secular Humorist
wrote:

On 9/16/10 11:40 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

"Secular wrote in message ...
On 9/16/10 10:15 AM, Jack wrote:
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.
You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's
initiative and independence.
You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could
and should do for themselves.

William E. Boetchker


In other words, whatever serves the rich is...right. Right? Bull****.

Harry Krause calling all of those points bull****. Who would have guessed.
BTW You, or should I say your wife, would be considered rich by most of the Obama supporters.

That's nothing, Harry would be considered "smart" by most of the Obama
supporters too! LOL!!!


Certainly smarter than you are.

Tosk and Jackoff, a gold mine if stupidity were gold.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:55:29 -0400, Secular Humorist
wrote:

On 9/16/10 11:40 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

"Secular wrote in message ...
On 9/16/10 10:15 AM, Jack wrote:
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.
You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's
initiative and independence.
You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could
and should do for themselves.

William E. Boetchker


In other words, whatever serves the rich is...right. Right? Bull****.

Harry Krause calling all of those points bull****. Who would have guessed.
BTW You, or should I say your wife, would be considered rich by most of the Obama supporters.

That's nothing, Harry would be considered "smart" by most of the Obama
supporters too! LOL!!!


Certainly smarter than you are.

Tosk and Jackoff, a gold mine if stupidity were gold.

I'm glad you've come back, buddy. The only other person here who
believes all of my tales of grandeur is Don.

In article , says...

On 9/16/10 11:40 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

"Secular wrote in message ...
On 9/16/10 10:15 AM, Jack wrote:
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.
You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's
initiative and independence.
You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could
and should do for themselves.

William E. Boetchker


In other words, whatever serves the rich is...right. Right? Bull****.

Harry Krause calling all of those points bull****. Who would have guessed.
BTW You, or should I say your wife, would be considered rich by most of the Obama supporters.

That's nothing, Harry would be considered "smart" by most of the Obama
supporters too! LOL!!!


Certainly smarter than you are.

Spoofer alert! I went to Yale fir ****'s sake. I certainly wouldn't
waste my time here debating who's smarter than who unless I was just a
fat narcissistic blow hard. Wait, never mind.

On 9/16/10 1:05 PM, Secular Humanist wrote:
In , says...

Spoofer alert! I went to Yale fir ****'s sake. I certainly wouldn't
waste my time here debating who's smarter than who unless I was just a
fat narcissistic blow hard. Wait, never mind.

You don't fool anyone, you are not Harry! Harry is much more obnoxious
and juvenile. Buzz off and stop egging him on, he is sick and needs
your support and understanding.

--
Dr. Karen Grear
Harry's Landlord

In article ,
says...

On 9/16/10 1:05 PM, Secular Humanist wrote:
In , says...

Spoofer alert! I went to Yale fir ****'s sake. I certainly wouldn't
waste my time here debating who's smarter than who unless I was just a
fat narcissistic blow hard. Wait, never mind.

You don't fool anyone, you are not Harry! Harry is much more obnoxious
and juvenile. Buzz off and stop egging him on, he is sick and needs
your support and understanding.

I've tried to tone it down because I knew you were here reading my
prose.