On 27-Sep-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

I explained the solution. What's your plan?

You explained nothing about a viable solution. You just ranted about
"taking
back" the country. Meaningless.

I've never use the term "taking back the country." That's a mindless
political rant that must appeal to the waddling masses or it wouldn't be
repeatedly used.



We're in a recession. They've happened before. The current administration
is
doing all it can (anything less would be political suicide) to turn things

around. The Dems in Congress are doing _some_ of what's needed, e.g., the
last effort was today with the small business loan bill that Obama signed.

They aren't doing enough and are afraid of their own shadow for a couple
of
reasons.

One in particular is that they have no clue. All the government can, and
should do, is structure to encourage outoput, not increase taxes, pay the
debts of irresponsible sub governments, and finance lessons to jungle
dwellers on how to wash their dicks after they cornholed another jungle
dweller. You should be ashamed of your government. How will they pay for
this crap??? No problem, YOU pay for it. Increased long term high wage
emplotyment? ZIP. No reason, ior need, for productive output to expand in
the U.S.


We need to continue along the path of economic reform. We need to
reintroduce and reinforce regulations that have been removed, gutted, or
ignored. We need to reduce the military budget in a responsible way (we
don't want to add to the unemployment roles by dumping a bunch of people
on
the street), we need to continue to extricate ourselves from two wars, we
need to stop funding some of the European/Asian military bases,

EXCELLENT

we need to

expand healthcare coverage, tax the top 2% more, reduce the size and scope

of the biggest banks, increase our infrastructure funding, and most
importantly stop listening and start ignoring blowhard naysayers and
fundamentalists.

Well, you were doing well, but you screwed up on the increase in welfare.
75% of the population on handouts is already far too much.

Nothing above, unfortunately, would contribute to increased multi level
production.

You should run for office - either corrupt party would be fine - same
theories.