On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:48:33 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 26-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

U.S. radio and television would be seen as a focused attack in most
countries, and would be thought of that way if your population had any
priorities.

you're an idiot if you get the news only from your own country's news
source. i haven't done that since i was 12.

you? you get yours from rush.

I read probably 6 or 8 newspapers from across the world daily

gee. the US pretty much has the right wing market cornered. so you
read only US newspapers?

- if you get
"news" on the idiot box you'd be better of watching Nickelodeon.

yep. and most americans are conservative so get their news from fox.
it's made them idiots

The
British papers have far more on line about what is happening in the U.S.
than any U.S. publication, because the U.S. publications broadcast what is
interesting to "Americans," such as which Hollywood whore didn't wear
panties today or is back in jail, or what the empty suit is going to do to
send you $300 for your vote. "Inquiring minds what to know!" Hahahahahahaha

no one here reads the 'economist'. a pity. but america is very right
wing so people aren't interested in facts

just like you