Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I googled Gulf of Mexico oil rig explosion, and came up with an article from
of all places, the Arizona Wildcat. Wild accusations of explosions and oil sheen, although a sheen could not be seen EVEN FROM A HELICOPTER, which tells you there WAS NO SHEEN. And does anyone know the difference between a sheen and an oil spill? Class? Class? We have all put out substantial sheens while starting and priming our boats, that is those few here who actually DO have a boat. You can get one hell of a sheen from one cup of water. In a helicopter, you can position yourself with the sun to see any visible sheen, and they couldn't do it. The article started out with EXPLOSION, EXPLOSION, EXPLOSION, and comparisons to BP. Then the facts were stated. No explosion, and a small fire from stored combustibles, all wells shut in, all personnel alive and accounted for. But who said that? Governor Bobby Jindal, trying to reduce hysteria and hyperventilation in the room. The story did state that the men did don their survival suits and jump into the water, for what reason I do not know. As facts and reports come out, that will be revealed. What I found interesting was the first EIGHT paragraphs were filled with information about government reactions, talk of restricting drilling, (they weren't even drilling) banning development, "investigations", blah blah blah. Then in paragraph NINE, they talk about the facts in a very very very short paragraph. It did say they were picked up in a life raft, but that could mean an escape capsule, as some of these morons do not know the difference between the two, but raft sounds more dire. Google oil rig escape pod. They are very different, easily distinguishable, but it will be interesting to see what it actually was. Anyone who can't tell the difference should be drug tested. The Mariner spokesman, who should know more than anybody said that they did not know the circumstances of why the men did go into the water, but this report is early, and perhaps more has been said on the issue since then. It was interesting that they did have survival suits, something that was nonexistent in the 70's when we were out there. In the summer, a guy would have a chance in a life jacket. Not in winter. Like other rational people, I'll want to get the facts for a final conclusion. In the meantime, I'll just watch all these hysterical fools run around the room and run into each other. Mind if I share this corner with you, Bub? This is funny, isn't it? Steve |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve B" wrote in message ... I googled Gulf of Mexico oil rig explosion, and came up with an article from of all places, the Arizona Wildcat. Wild accusations of explosions and oil sheen, although a sheen could not be seen EVEN FROM A HELICOPTER, which tells you there WAS NO SHEEN. And does anyone know the difference between a sheen and an oil spill? Class? Class? We have all put out substantial sheens while starting and priming our boats, that is those few here who actually DO have a boat. You can get one hell of a sheen from one cup of water. In a helicopter, you can position yourself with the sun to see any visible sheen, and they couldn't do it. The article started out with EXPLOSION, EXPLOSION, EXPLOSION, and comparisons to BP. Then the facts were stated. No explosion, and a small fire from stored combustibles, all wells shut in, all personnel alive and accounted for. But who said that? Governor Bobby Jindal, trying to reduce hysteria and hyperventilation in the room. The story did state that the men did don their survival suits and jump into the water, for what reason I do not know. As facts and reports come out, that will be revealed. What I found interesting was the first EIGHT paragraphs were filled with information about government reactions, talk of restricting drilling, (they weren't even drilling) banning development, "investigations", blah blah blah. Then in paragraph NINE, they talk about the facts in a very very very short paragraph. It did say they were picked up in a life raft, but that could mean an escape capsule, as some of these morons do not know the difference between the two, but raft sounds more dire. Google oil rig escape pod. They are very different, easily distinguishable, but it will be interesting to see what it actually was. Anyone who can't tell the difference should be drug tested. The Mariner spokesman, who should know more than anybody said that they did not know the circumstances of why the men did go into the water, but this report is early, and perhaps more has been said on the issue since then. It was interesting that they did have survival suits, something that was nonexistent in the 70's when we were out there. In the summer, a guy would have a chance in a life jacket. Not in winter. Like other rational people, I'll want to get the facts for a final conclusion. In the meantime, I'll just watch all these hysterical fools run around the room and run into each other. Mind if I share this corner with you, Bub? This is funny, isn't it? Steve Yeah, a fireball = no explosion... perhaps in your mind. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Explosion and fire down my pier | Cruising | |||
Explosion and Fire! | ASA | |||
Yacht Explosion, Little Current, Ontario | Cruising | |||
3+ die in tanker explosion off Virginia | General | |||
Settlement in Silverton Boat Explosion | General |