Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 09:08:02 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/art...ts_106844.html Here's a good quote from the article: "Then there's this head-scratching detail: In an absolutely outrageous move last Christmas Eve, President Obama signed off on $42 million in bonuses for the top 12 Fannie and Freddie executives, including $6 million apiece for the two CEOs." WTF??? if memory serves, i believe this was required by the contract regarding the bailout. he may have had no choice |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 09:08:02 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/art...ts_106844.html Here's a good quote from the article: "Then there's this head-scratching detail: In an absolutely outrageous move last Christmas Eve, President Obama signed off on $42 million in bonuses for the top 12 Fannie and Freddie executives, including $6 million apiece for the two CEOs." WTF??? if memory serves, i believe this was required by the contract regarding the bailout. he may have had no choice WTF? These guys needed a bail out and in order to give it to them the Gov't had to agree on huge bonuses? Top officers of any failed institution should be shown the door, not a bag of cash, especially not tax money. How did we get this stupid? If a ship runs aground, the Captain gets fired, not a GD reward! |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "mmc" wrote in message g.com... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 09:08:02 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/art...ts_106844.html Here's a good quote from the article: "Then there's this head-scratching detail: In an absolutely outrageous move last Christmas Eve, President Obama signed off on $42 million in bonuses for the top 12 Fannie and Freddie executives, including $6 million apiece for the two CEOs." WTF??? if memory serves, i believe this was required by the contract regarding the bailout. he may have had no choice WTF? These guys needed a bail out and in order to give it to them the Gov't had to agree on huge bonuses? Top officers of any failed institution should be shown the door, not a bag of cash, especially not tax money. How did we get this stupid? If a ship runs aground, the Captain gets fired, not a GD reward! it's rotten to the core and really does show who runs the country. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "YukonBound" wrote in message ... "mmc" wrote in message g.com... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 09:08:02 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/art...ts_106844.html Here's a good quote from the article: "Then there's this head-scratching detail: In an absolutely outrageous move last Christmas Eve, President Obama signed off on $42 million in bonuses for the top 12 Fannie and Freddie executives, including $6 million apiece for the two CEOs." WTF??? if memory serves, i believe this was required by the contract regarding the bailout. he may have had no choice WTF? These guys needed a bail out and in order to give it to them the Gov't had to agree on huge bonuses? Top officers of any failed institution should be shown the door, not a bag of cash, especially not tax money. How did we get this stupid? If a ship runs aground, the Captain gets fired, not a GD reward! it's rotten to the core and really does show who runs the country. Yep, and it's not our elected officials. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:37:41 -0400, "mmc" wrote:
"bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 09:08:02 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/art...ts_106844.html Here's a good quote from the article: "Then there's this head-scratching detail: In an absolutely outrageous move last Christmas Eve, President Obama signed off on $42 million in bonuses for the top 12 Fannie and Freddie executives, including $6 million apiece for the two CEOs." WTF??? if memory serves, i believe this was required by the contract regarding the bailout. he may have had no choice WTF? These guys needed a bail out and in order to give it to them the Gov't had to agree on huge bonuses? yeah. look at who took over fannie mae when it got the govt bailout. the CEO was bascially bribed out of retirement. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Fannie's at it again | General | |||
More Barney | General | |||
Barney F. | ASA | |||
McCain aide linked to Freddie Scandal | ASA | |||
Whoops...McCain's Campaign Manager Lobbied for Freddie & Fannie | General |