"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Jack wrote:
On Aug 16, 8:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

You notice that he refuses to actually answer my question? He and
Nuckles
and "Larry" claim they aren't reading my posts. They're liars of
course.

Liar!! I have never claimed that I'm not reading anything here. It's
just pointless to argue with an idiot.

If the mosque builders had any respect and feelings for others, they'd
stop their plans, look for another site, and set up a fund of about $1
million that would help the children of the people that died in the
towers. That would help to build a bridge of peace and
understanding. Instead, they want to fan the flames.


I thought the feds already paid millions of dollars to those families.
If the 9/11 families have a problem with American Muslims and the 1st
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, they should just come right out and
say it instead of whining about their "feelings."
****ing lib crybabies. Sound like a Barbara Streisand song.
Or was that Dolly Parton?
You want war with American Muslims, just ****ing declare war.

Jim - Crybabies **** me off. Worse than the pols that get them crying.




So, you've decided that all 9/11 families are liberals? Hmmm.... that
seems unlikely.


Doesn't matter, those terms don't mean anything to me.
It's wingnut stuff. Sometimes I use their lingo.
What I said goes for the poster named Jack too.
Talking about "feelings" is either lib crybaby talk or right wingnut
weaseling lies.
He can take his pick.
Saying that the 1st Amendment shouldn't apply because of "feelings"
only means you don't believe the 1st Amendment should apply for American
Muslims but are too god damned cowardly to come out and say it.
Why the **** should American Muslims care about his "feelings" or
anybody else's? They didn't cause 9/11.
Some of them were first responders.
Backing down would be a tacit admission of guilt by them.
Looks like the anti-mosque crowd is trying to start a jihad.
No ****ing better than AQ.
And that weaseling Obama should make it clear whether or not he cares
about the "feelings" of this anti-American trash who want the 1st
Amendment breached in spirit by pressure tactics dressed up as "feelings."
He's another one too cowardly to talk straight.
I say **** them all and the horses they rode in on.

Jim - Nope. I'm not a Muslim. Don't like that religion at all.
But I am an American. And I see trash all over the place.

For someone for whom the "terms" don't mean anything, you should consider
not using them. They don't help make your case. What they do is to make you
sound like you need to rant. When you refer to "weaseling" Obama, you align
yourself with nutcases.